<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fighting Terror Via Law Enforcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: SFC B</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153863</link>
		<dc:creator>SFC B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153863</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rice ignores the Clarke terrorist policy memo...&lt;/blockquote&gt;CSS trotted out his uncomfortable man-crush on Richard Clarke before.  Rice ignored Clarke so much that she held multiple meetings with him and his superiors @ the CIA.  The Bush administration was even implementing some of Clarke&#039;s recommendations, including the arming of Predator drones with Hellfire missiles.

Of course, if the Clinton Administration had done that there might have been armed Predators available from the outset instead of the Bush administration needing to have them developed and tested.  But hey, I guess that interferes with that whole &quot;Bush was ignoring Richard Clarke&quot; meme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rice ignores the Clarke terrorist policy memo&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>CSS trotted out his uncomfortable man-crush on Richard Clarke before.  Rice ignored Clarke so much that she held multiple meetings with him and his superiors @ the CIA.  The Bush administration was even implementing some of Clarke&#8217;s recommendations, including the arming of Predator drones with Hellfire missiles.</p>
<p>Of course, if the Clinton Administration had done that there might have been armed Predators available from the outset instead of the Bush administration needing to have them developed and tested.  But hey, I guess that interferes with that whole &#8220;Bush was ignoring Richard Clarke&#8221; meme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153751</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153751</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Though most LEO’s are well meaning people who do a thankless dangerous job. They, from what I have seen, by default, defend the “Bullies with badges”. Get rid of the thugs in your profession and people will look at it differently.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ve never understood the attitude that the way to convince people your group (cops, soldiers, teachers, priests, whatever) contains no bad apples is to cover up for the bad apples.  Far better is to actively make sure they are found out and publicly kicked out.

&quot;I know there are no bad cops because I&#039;ve seen the force actively getting rid of them.  Cops have demonstrated that they simply will not tolerate illegal behavior in their ranks.&quot; is a far, far better reassurance than &quot;I know there are no bad cops because the cops tell me there aren&#039;t, and whenever they investigate complaints against cops they find them to be baseless.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Though most LEO’s are well meaning people who do a thankless dangerous job. They, from what I have seen, by default, defend the “Bullies with badges”. Get rid of the thugs in your profession and people will look at it differently.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never understood the attitude that the way to convince people your group (cops, soldiers, teachers, priests, whatever) contains no bad apples is to cover up for the bad apples.  Far better is to actively make sure they are found out and publicly kicked out.</p>
<p>&#8220;I know there are no bad cops because I&#8217;ve seen the force actively getting rid of them.  Cops have demonstrated that they simply will not tolerate illegal behavior in their ranks.&#8221; is a far, far better reassurance than &#8220;I know there are no bad cops because the cops tell me there aren&#8217;t, and whenever they investigate complaints against cops they find them to be baseless.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpymann</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153606</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpymann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 22:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153606</guid>
		<description>Ol&#039;Froth,

I was one of those &quot;Blacks&quot; who was not &quot;robbing people, raping women, and shooting people in the head&quot;. And to this very day. (I&#039;m 41 years old this week and married) I still get &quot;slow rolled&quot;, stopped and frisked, stopped for a &quot;safety check in a brand new vehicle, patted down and harassed.

As a 17 year old child I was stopped halled in to the back of a police car, and beaten till I was hospitalized for walking down the street (literally just that). I woke up to have an officer standing in my living room with a GUN POINTED AT MY HEAD. (When I went to the station to make a complaint about that little happening I pointed out the VERY officer that did it. I was threatened.)

I&#039;ve visited good friends in the hospital who were beaten into a coma by officers. And no charges were filed against them because he was scared for his life. 

And that aint the half of it. 

Now that said I have worked with law enforcement and have good friends that are in law enforcement. I also am OPTOC certified in the state of Ohio. And had some very good contacts with law enforcement. But on the whole they ignore my calls for aid when I need it. Harass me when I&#039;ve done nothing wrong and a few have made a habit out of violating my civil and human rights.Been a victim of malfeasance and abuse of authority. This has been is dozens of cities in many states. 

Do I have a problem with law enforcement in general? Yes, and I will tell you why. Though most LEO&#039;s are well meaning people who do a thankless dangerous job. They, from what I have seen, by default, defend the &quot;Bullies with badges&quot;. Get rid of the thugs in your profession and people will look at it differently. 

AS I have been quoted as saying again and again &quot;I will stop reacting to law enforcement like an armed gang occupying my neighborhood when they stop acting like it.&quot;

To quote a likable cult film. &quot;When policemen brake the law there isn&#039;t any law.&quot; 

Peace Be With You.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ol&#8217;Froth,</p>
<p>I was one of those &#8220;Blacks&#8221; who was not &#8220;robbing people, raping women, and shooting people in the head&#8221;. And to this very day. (I&#8217;m 41 years old this week and married) I still get &#8220;slow rolled&#8221;, stopped and frisked, stopped for a &#8220;safety check in a brand new vehicle, patted down and harassed.</p>
<p>As a 17 year old child I was stopped halled in to the back of a police car, and beaten till I was hospitalized for walking down the street (literally just that). I woke up to have an officer standing in my living room with a GUN POINTED AT MY HEAD. (When I went to the station to make a complaint about that little happening I pointed out the VERY officer that did it. I was threatened.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve visited good friends in the hospital who were beaten into a coma by officers. And no charges were filed against them because he was scared for his life. </p>
<p>And that aint the half of it. </p>
<p>Now that said I have worked with law enforcement and have good friends that are in law enforcement. I also am OPTOC certified in the state of Ohio. And had some very good contacts with law enforcement. But on the whole they ignore my calls for aid when I need it. Harass me when I&#8217;ve done nothing wrong and a few have made a habit out of violating my civil and human rights.Been a victim of malfeasance and abuse of authority. This has been is dozens of cities in many states. </p>
<p>Do I have a problem with law enforcement in general? Yes, and I will tell you why. Though most LEO&#8217;s are well meaning people who do a thankless dangerous job. They, from what I have seen, by default, defend the &#8220;Bullies with badges&#8221;. Get rid of the thugs in your profession and people will look at it differently. </p>
<p>AS I have been quoted as saying again and again &#8220;I will stop reacting to law enforcement like an armed gang occupying my neighborhood when they stop acting like it.&#8221;</p>
<p>To quote a likable cult film. &#8220;When policemen brake the law there isn&#8217;t any law.&#8221; </p>
<p>Peace Be With You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol'Froth</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153603</link>
		<dc:creator>Ol'Froth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 22:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153603</guid>
		<description>ManateDodo I DON&quot;T deny that there are abusive police officers, and I condemn those that engage in illegal behavior.  However, I object strongly to painting all police officers with a broad brush.  Most are dedicated, hard working, officers.  Turn it around for a bit...analyze this phrase: Will Blacks take time out of their busy schedule of robbing people, raping women, and shooting people in the head who infringe on their drug dealing territory to actually do something that makes them a positive force in society???

Now let me say I do not for one minute believe that that is how most minorities spend their time, but it is a perception held by bigots.  All I&#039;m asking is that you don&#039;t paint those of us working to ensure your safety with the same broad brush that the racist assholes use to paint the downtrodden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ManateDodo I DON&#8221;T deny that there are abusive police officers, and I condemn those that engage in illegal behavior.  However, I object strongly to painting all police officers with a broad brush.  Most are dedicated, hard working, officers.  Turn it around for a bit&#8230;analyze this phrase: Will Blacks take time out of their busy schedule of robbing people, raping women, and shooting people in the head who infringe on their drug dealing territory to actually do something that makes them a positive force in society???</p>
<p>Now let me say I do not for one minute believe that that is how most minorities spend their time, but it is a perception held by bigots.  All I&#8217;m asking is that you don&#8217;t paint those of us working to ensure your safety with the same broad brush that the racist assholes use to paint the downtrodden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153561</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153561</guid>
		<description>Good point, matante. Except where it&#039;s not.

Soullite&#039;s slam wasn&#039;t against bad cops, but all cops -- he stated that such abuses are part of the routine schedule and duties of law enforcement. Didn&#039;t even imply it. So the folks who are taking exception to soullite&#039;s remarks are entirely justified.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, matante. Except where it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>Soullite&#8217;s slam wasn&#8217;t against bad cops, but all cops &#8212; he stated that such abuses are part of the routine schedule and duties of law enforcement. Didn&#8217;t even imply it. So the folks who are taking exception to soullite&#8217;s remarks are entirely justified.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatanteDodo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153559</link>
		<dc:creator>MatanteDodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153559</guid>
		<description>Ol&#039;Froth: you can&#039;t deny that there are many abusive people in the police and military and that asking for an apology when their behavior is pointed out is exactly the kind of thing that leads people to view the whole force as violent and corrupt...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ol&#8217;Froth: you can&#8217;t deny that there are many abusive people in the police and military and that asking for an apology when their behavior is pointed out is exactly the kind of thing that leads people to view the whole force as violent and corrupt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153542</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153542</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Conspiracy to commit a criminal act is a crime itself. Moron&lt;/i&gt;

And how would anyone have known Atta was conspiring to commit a criminal act?  If only they could have wiretapped his phone, traced his funds, detained him indefinitly.

Say, aren&#039;t all those policies championed by Bush/Cheney?  Policies that send the denziens of this board into apoplexy?  Policies that, despite campaigning against them, CiC Obama is continuing to utilize now that he&#039;s actually responsible for the safety of the nation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Conspiracy to commit a criminal act is a crime itself. Moron</i></p>
<p>And how would anyone have known Atta was conspiring to commit a criminal act?  If only they could have wiretapped his phone, traced his funds, detained him indefinitly.</p>
<p>Say, aren&#8217;t all those policies championed by Bush/Cheney?  Policies that send the denziens of this board into apoplexy?  Policies that, despite campaigning against them, CiC Obama is continuing to utilize now that he&#8217;s actually responsible for the safety of the nation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153535</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 08:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153535</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of good cops, &quot;soullite&quot;.

Sorry you haven&#039;t met any.

They&#039;re out there, though.

And they are very positive forces in society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of good cops, &#8220;soullite&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sorry you haven&#8217;t met any.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re out there, though.</p>
<p>And they are very positive forces in society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol'Froth</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153475</link>
		<dc:creator>Ol'Froth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153475</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Bruce Henry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Bruce Henry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153472</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153472</guid>
		<description>I like your site, Ol&#039;Froth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your site, Ol&#8217;Froth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol'Froth</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153470</link>
		<dc:creator>Ol'Froth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153470</guid>
		<description>Soullite, I am a law enforcement officer and I have never brutalized a protestor, sodomized someone with a plunger, or shot an unarmed person in the back.  So, may I please politly ask you to apologize for smearing the vast number of dedicated, hard working police officers by basing your oponion on the actions of a deranged few?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soullite, I am a law enforcement officer and I have never brutalized a protestor, sodomized someone with a plunger, or shot an unarmed person in the back.  So, may I please politly ask you to apologize for smearing the vast number of dedicated, hard working police officers by basing your oponion on the actions of a deranged few?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153466</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153466</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Bill Clinton tried the law-enforcement method almost exclusively. And that worked out just dandy, didn’t it? I mean, the people who helped plot the first World Trade Center bombing certainly learned their lesson when their buddies were arrested, tried, and jailed.&lt;/em&gt;

I must confess that Mr. Clinton&#039;s law enforcement approach wasn&#039;t nearly as effective as Mr. Bush&#039;s military approach. After all, the Taleban is no more, isn&#039;t that right Mr. Tea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Bill Clinton tried the law-enforcement method almost exclusively. And that worked out just dandy, didn’t it? I mean, the people who helped plot the first World Trade Center bombing certainly learned their lesson when their buddies were arrested, tried, and jailed.</em></p>
<p>I must confess that Mr. Clinton&#8217;s law enforcement approach wasn&#8217;t nearly as effective as Mr. Bush&#8217;s military approach. After all, the Taleban is no more, isn&#8217;t that right Mr. Tea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soullite</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153465</link>
		<dc:creator>soullite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153465</guid>
		<description>The big question is, will law enforcement take time out of their busy schedule of brutalizing protestors, sodomizing people with plungers and shooting unarmed men in the back to actually do something that makes them a positive force in society??

 Right now, cops look like chicken shit bullies who want to torture people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big question is, will law enforcement take time out of their busy schedule of brutalizing protestors, sodomizing people with plungers and shooting unarmed men in the back to actually do something that makes them a positive force in society??</p>
<p> Right now, cops look like chicken shit bullies who want to torture people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlobo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153458</link>
		<dc:creator>jlobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Exactly what law did Mohammed Atta break prior to his stint as a pilot?&quot;


Conspiracy to commit a criminal act is a crime itself. Moron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Exactly what law did Mohammed Atta break prior to his stint as a pilot?&#8221;</p>
<p>Conspiracy to commit a criminal act is a crime itself. Moron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur1138</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153450</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur1138</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153450</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Both work, in different ways. And both need to be used — police and military.&lt;/i&gt;

The military response to terrorism can be effective in certain circumstances, like when you have a well-defined target who is generally agreed to be culpable for a recent major attack and is clearly an imminent threat for more major attacks in the near future (This is why many of us denizens of the reality-based community supported Bush&#039;s invasion of Afghanistan yet recoiled in horror when the mission morphed into the disastrously quixotic &quot;war on terror&quot;).  When such circumstances do not prevail, terror prevention is properly the province of intelligence and law enforcement.  One of the most damaging delusions the republicans peddled in the Bush years was that intelligence and law enforcement were somehow a weak or unworthy response to the threat before us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Both work, in different ways. And both need to be used — police and military.</i></p>
<p>The military response to terrorism can be effective in certain circumstances, like when you have a well-defined target who is generally agreed to be culpable for a recent major attack and is clearly an imminent threat for more major attacks in the near future (This is why many of us denizens of the reality-based community supported Bush&#8217;s invasion of Afghanistan yet recoiled in horror when the mission morphed into the disastrously quixotic &#8220;war on terror&#8221;).  When such circumstances do not prevail, terror prevention is properly the province of intelligence and law enforcement.  One of the most damaging delusions the republicans peddled in the Bush years was that intelligence and law enforcement were somehow a weak or unworthy response to the threat before us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153449</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153449</guid>
		<description>When Democratic President Clinton was bombing bin Laden&#039;s camps the right wingers were screaming that it was a distraction.

Right wingers were demanding he reveal his personal sex life.

Democratic President Clinton&#039;s claims that addressing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.HavenWorks.com/terrorism&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;terrorism&lt;/a&gt; was important was met by right wingers demanding semen samples from the &#039;blue dress.&#039;

When Democratic President Clinton left, he and many members of his team tried to impress on the incoming Republican Bush administration how important attacking terrorism was.

The Republicans ignored them.

Republicans were more interested in tax cuts, deregulation, and vacations.

As right winger &quot;Jay&quot; notes, it was (over) 7 months into Republican President Bush&#039;s administration that the 9/11 attacks happened on Republican Bush&#039;s watch.

Republican President Bush had had repeated warnings during those seven months that an attack was coming.

Republican Bush kept going on vacations.

Republican Bush was on vacation when he was explicitly warned that Osama bin Laden was planning on attacking the US.

Republican Bush stayed on vacation and smugly dismissed those that warned him.

After the attacks Republican Bush then failed to protect US from the anthrax attacks.

Then Republican Bush lied US into the wrong war, which misdirected American troops away from where the attackers had been based.

And then Republicans continued to demand tax cuts during this two front war, which meant that American troops went without body armor, &lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/acronyms/a-z/m/mrap&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MRAPs&lt;/a&gt;, and appropriate medical funding for things like &lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/acronyms/a-z/p/ptsd&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PTSD&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/military/walter-reed-army-medical-center&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Walter Reed military hospital&lt;/a&gt;.

Meanwhile, Republican Bush DOUBLED the &lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/us/debt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;US debt&lt;/a&gt; at home and his deregulating mania is directly attributable to the global financial collapse and collapse of America&#039;s power as a financial heavyweight.

Law enforcement might have prevented the 9/11 attacks.

And &lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/law/enforcement&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;law enforcement&lt;/a&gt; would have clearly prevented the global financial collapse and retained America&#039;s financial power.

Why are Republicans against American law enforcement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Democratic President Clinton was bombing bin Laden&#8217;s camps the right wingers were screaming that it was a distraction.</p>
<p>Right wingers were demanding he reveal his personal sex life.</p>
<p>Democratic President Clinton&#8217;s claims that addressing <a href="http://www.HavenWorks.com/terrorism" rel="nofollow">terrorism</a> was important was met by right wingers demanding semen samples from the &#8216;blue dress.&#8217;</p>
<p>When Democratic President Clinton left, he and many members of his team tried to impress on the incoming Republican Bush administration how important attacking terrorism was.</p>
<p>The Republicans ignored them.</p>
<p>Republicans were more interested in tax cuts, deregulation, and vacations.</p>
<p>As right winger &#8220;Jay&#8221; notes, it was (over) 7 months into Republican President Bush&#8217;s administration that the 9/11 attacks happened on Republican Bush&#8217;s watch.</p>
<p>Republican President Bush had had repeated warnings during those seven months that an attack was coming.</p>
<p>Republican Bush kept going on vacations.</p>
<p>Republican Bush was on vacation when he was explicitly warned that Osama bin Laden was planning on attacking the US.</p>
<p>Republican Bush stayed on vacation and smugly dismissed those that warned him.</p>
<p>After the attacks Republican Bush then failed to protect US from the anthrax attacks.</p>
<p>Then Republican Bush lied US into the wrong war, which misdirected American troops away from where the attackers had been based.</p>
<p>And then Republicans continued to demand tax cuts during this two front war, which meant that American troops went without body armor, <a href="http://HavenWorks.com/acronyms/a-z/m/mrap" rel="nofollow">MRAPs</a>, and appropriate medical funding for things like <a href="http://HavenWorks.com/acronyms/a-z/p/ptsd" rel="nofollow">PTSD</a> and the <a href="http://HavenWorks.com/military/walter-reed-army-medical-center" rel="nofollow">Walter Reed military hospital</a>.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Republican Bush DOUBLED the <a href="http://HavenWorks.com/us/debt" rel="nofollow">US debt</a> at home and his deregulating mania is directly attributable to the global financial collapse and collapse of America&#8217;s power as a financial heavyweight.</p>
<p>Law enforcement might have prevented the 9/11 attacks.</p>
<p>And <a href="http://HavenWorks.com/law/enforcement" rel="nofollow">law enforcement</a> would have clearly prevented the global financial collapse and retained America&#8217;s financial power.</p>
<p>Why are Republicans against American law enforcement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD100</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153430</link>
		<dc:creator>PD100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153430</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Perhaps if he had put a strangle-hold on their money instead of waiting for something to happen first.&lt;/i&gt;

He did -via &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13099&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Executive Order 13099&lt;/a&gt; as well as imposing sanctions on the Taliban. You were saying?

&lt;i&gt;It is unreal that you’re still hanging on to this childish fantasy that everything the US government did to thwart terrorism was functioning on a high level and it was all demolished on January 21st, 2001&lt;/i&gt;

 Indeed, what a slack job: The Khobar tower bombers are executed, the counterterrorism focus authorizing the CIA to use lethal force on Bin Laden, the thwarted attacks on LAX on the Holland tunnel, etc.
  But, after January 21st, Cheney ignores Hart/Rudman, Rice   ignores the Clarke terrorist policy memo and the anti-terror focus of the new Bush administration becomes....Missile defense. August 6th PDB be dammed. Bra-vo.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;It’s when the RESPONSE to SUCCESSFUL terrorist attacks (5 in 7 years under Clinton) is nothing but subpoenas, arrests, indictments, and threats of legal action which does nothing but make said terrorists sit around and laugh their asses off.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

  Oh yeah, the &quot;They tried to kill my daddy&quot; war just did great for stemming the body count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Perhaps if he had put a strangle-hold on their money instead of waiting for something to happen first.</i></p>
<p>He did -via <a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13099" rel="nofollow">Executive Order 13099</a> as well as imposing sanctions on the Taliban. You were saying?</p>
<p><i>It is unreal that you’re still hanging on to this childish fantasy that everything the US government did to thwart terrorism was functioning on a high level and it was all demolished on January 21st, 2001</i></p>
<p> Indeed, what a slack job: The Khobar tower bombers are executed, the counterterrorism focus authorizing the CIA to use lethal force on Bin Laden, the thwarted attacks on LAX on the Holland tunnel, etc.<br />
  But, after January 21st, Cheney ignores Hart/Rudman, Rice   ignores the Clarke terrorist policy memo and the anti-terror focus of the new Bush administration becomes&#8230;.Missile defense. August 6th PDB be dammed. Bra-vo.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;It’s when the RESPONSE to SUCCESSFUL terrorist attacks (5 in 7 years under Clinton) is nothing but subpoenas, arrests, indictments, and threats of legal action which does nothing but make said terrorists sit around and laugh their asses off.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>  Oh yeah, the &#8220;They tried to kill my daddy&#8221; war just did great for stemming the body count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153423</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153423</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Exactly what law did Mohammed Atta break prior to his stint as a pilot?&lt;/i&gt;

Probably none, but taking flying lessons but not wanting to know how to land a 767 certainly should have made him a &quot;person of interest,&quot; no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Exactly what law did Mohammed Atta break prior to his stint as a pilot?</i></p>
<p>Probably none, but taking flying lessons but not wanting to know how to land a 767 certainly should have made him a &#8220;person of interest,&#8221; no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD100</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153413</link>
		<dc:creator>PD100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153413</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Bill Clinton tried the law-enforcement method almost exclusively. And that worked out just dandy, didn’t it?&lt;/i&gt;

  Why yes Podhertz mouthpiece, the law-enforcement method did work to thwart a plot to bomb Los Angeles International airport (LAX) and stop the Holland &amp; Lincoln Tunnels from being blown up as well. Thanks for playing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Bill Clinton tried the law-enforcement method almost exclusively. And that worked out just dandy, didn’t it?</i></p>
<p>  Why yes Podhertz mouthpiece, the law-enforcement method did work to thwart a plot to bomb Los Angeles International airport (LAX) and stop the Holland &amp; Lincoln Tunnels from being blown up as well. Thanks for playing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpymann</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/21/fighting-terror-via-law-enforcement/#comment-153406</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpymann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14720#comment-153406</guid>
		<description>&quot;jury of your peers&quot;

What a concept. 

&quot;Due Process&quot;

Silly rabbit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;jury of your peers&#8221;</p>
<p>What a concept. </p>
<p>&#8220;Due Process&#8221;</p>
<p>Silly rabbit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

