Enough With Harry Reid

12:58 pm EST May 20th, 2009 | News | 10 Comments

The man is a serious mistake in leadership, and the only reason it isn’t a bigger deal right now is because we’ve got Obama in the White House.

Topic: ,

Related Posts

«
»

10 Responses to “Enough With Harry Reid”

  1. merl says:
    May 20, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    why is he the leader? and for how much longer?

  2. joaquin says:
    May 20, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    Eh, merl, he was elected and so was Pelosi.
    Two real beauties, eh?

  3. jr says:
    May 20, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    Harry’s been in the beltway too long. He spews Broderist nonsense when you pull the string in his back

  4. william says:
    May 20, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    Wow…”The Patriot Act, wiretaps, e-mail intercepts, military tribunals, Predator drone attacks, Iraq, Afghanistan — and now Guantánamo” are all OK under Obama, but were subhuman under Bush.

    I guess that’s what was meant by CHANGE.

  5. GOPnot4me says:
    May 20, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    I want to play poker against Harry for BIG bucks.

    What a tool. It’s embarrassing.

    Now that we have more Dems, we need better Dems.

    I ain’t too fond of Nancy, either.

    All the things Harry wanted for us in 1948 are left undone.

    What’s it gonna take?

  6. GOPnot4me says:
    May 20, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    Harry TRUMAN, not Reid.

    My bad for not being clear.

  7. justadood says:
    May 20, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    remember, Reid wasn’t elected by his constituents or the Nation at large to be Senate Majority Leader. This ‘honor’ came from a consensus of the Democratic contingent.

    What we need are enough Dem Senators with the balls to propose and second a no-confidence vote, and pass with a majority of said contingent.

    Soooooo…..how does one pressure their Senator(s) to not only propose and second this, but secure the majority necesary? The Floor’s open to suggestions…….

  8. Duros62 says:
    May 21, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    What we need are enough Dem Senators with the balls to propose and second a no-confidence vote, and pass with a majority of said contingent.

    I second.

  9. News Reference says:
    May 22, 2009 at 4:06 am

    http://feingold.senate.gov

    One can wish.

  10. Eric the Political Hack says:
    May 22, 2009 at 10:19 pm

    I can’t imagine that Reid’s tenure as ML will last much longer. He has a tough re-election that he will need to focus on, and my suspicion is that he will step down sooner, rather than later. (My hunch is after health care and cap-and-trade get voted on)

    I think the real topic will be, who will take over for Reid? Clinton is at State now. Making Dodd leader is political suicide at the moment, despite previous wishes of some liberal bloggers. So who do we have? Schumer is my guess.