Wingnut Babies Upset Steele Won’t Call Dems “Socialists”



('DiggThis’)

Share

They just get crazier and crazier.

Republican state party leaders are rebelling against new Republican National Committee Chairman Michael S. Steele for failing to dub President Obama and the Democrats as “socialists.” And the rebels insist that the label matters.

Even though Mr. Steele has called his Democratic adversaries “collectivists,” at least 16 state leaders say the term lacks the pejorative punch needed to sway public opinion and want all 168 members of the Republican National Committee to debate and vote on it.

It’s worth pointing out – again – that this isn’t some outside the party deal. This is the core of the party upset at their incompetent party chairman for not calling the President Of The United States a socialist.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

11 Responses to “Wingnut Babies Upset Steele Won’t Call Dems “Socialists””

  1. Bruce says:

    In most countries in the world, the party platform and Obama policy agenda would represent a rightward lurch. The Dems are to the right of the policy platform of the conservative Christian Democrats of Germany, the British Tories, the Conservative Party of Canada.

    While conservatives sometimes gripe about how the word “liberal” meant laissez-faire not leftist politics, the Democrats are in fact a classically liberal party in most respects – respecting the free market with remarkably modest interference. Only compared to the theocrats of the Republican party does the Democratic Party look “leftist.” Clinton and Carter both would have been a Tory pretty much anywhere else in the world.

    There are socialists in this country. Maybe Dennis Kucinich might qualify. Bernie Sanders openly and without apology. Maybe the left-wing most 25% of the House Progressive Caucus. Not Donna Edwards (MD-4), who defeated a corporate tool but is still not a socialist. The proposed tax rates under Obama are positively Milton Friedman-esque compared to the actual higher taxes under Eisenhower and Nixon and Ford. Of course, stupid conservatives cannot read their own history, it seems.

  2. Leota2 says:

    This hysterically sad group of Republicans will never crawl out of their 1950’s styled “The commies are coming” basement think.

    Honestly–it makes me smile every time they start screaming that Democrats and Obama are socialists. I get that feeling that most families get when crazy Uncle Frank strips down to his underwear at the family reunion and starts singing sea chanties.

    You know it’s going to happen, you’ve seen and heard it all before, you don’t want to laugh too loud because you are a wee bit ashamed for him, but–hell, it’s damned funny.

  3. Parthenon says:

    Bruce has it exactly right.

  4. Tyro says:

    This hysterically sad group of Republicans will never crawl out of their 1950’s styled “The commies are coming” basement think.

    I graduated from high school during the early 90s, and I recently visited my old high school history teacher, who showed me a journal of essays about world issues that her students had written about. I mentioned that, for them, the things happening in the world when I grew up are as remote to them as the vietnam war was to me (ie, a distant memory mentioned by their parents). My teacher mentioned that current students have no memory of the cold war. In fact, when you think about it, current high school students were born after the Cold War was over. This sort of red-baiting no longer resonates with people. While on one hand, conservatives should be happy that the lack of a communist threat means they no longer have to hand out increasing benefits to workers to keep the public from generating communist sympathies, they should also be away that the lack of a communist rival means that the “threat” of socialism just isn’t really a “threat.” It’s hard to claim that better health coverage and 90s-era
    marginal tax rates will lead us on a slippery slope to a system that no longer really exists. As worst it will be a slippery slope to… Denmark?

  5. MacKneel says:

    I love watching the sad tattered remains of the GOP spin their wheels further into the mud, all the while not having a fucking clue of how deep they’ve already sunk. I think it’s a hoot, because their plan will be to go harder to the right in 2010 and 2012. They actually don’t understand that their party was rejected clearly by the voters, yet they really believe they lost because they weren’t conservative enough. Too. Funny.

    Scream it louder, wingnuts. Scream the word SOCIALIST over and over and over again, like a schizo on the street corner who thinks the FBI has implanted a chip into his brain to read his thoughts.

    Palin Jindal 2012!

  6. blogenfreude says:

    I’ll say it again – all they have left are sociopaths, the home-schooled, and the clinically insane.

    Damn I’m enjoying this.

  7. syco says:

    It would be funny if it wasn’t such a sad sight

  8. Jaim says:

    Reagan convinced Americans that government was the problem.

    Bush II pretty much threw that philosophy down the shitter. Americans are hurting right now due to the Bush/Republican Recession, and they want government to play a limited role in America’s recovery.

    What’s funny is that Republicans value loyalty above all else, and they knew this might happen. But they couldn’t bring themselves to criticize Chimpy and his policies. They only have themselves to blame.

  9. [...] over his ideological leadership by conservative members of his own national committee.” Both Oliver Willis and Steve Benen see the resolution as “evidence of broader trouble for [...]

  10. aarrgghh says:

    whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad …

Oliver Willis

Contact
Email: owillis@gmail.com
Twitter
Facebook
Flickr
AIM: oliverwill
Huffington Post Columns
Media Matters Blog Entries