Comments on: Reality Vs. Chris Wallace

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:00:01 +0000

Fine, but props to Rescue Me.

By: Eric Sipple

Eric Sipple — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:24:25 +0000

Seriously, dude. I’m so very excited that they left me with yet another cliffhanger ending with no resolution. 10 years of unresolved endings to great SF shows is what I call an awesome legacy.

By: Grumpymann

Grumpymann — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:17:55 +0000

OMG I agree wit Jay Tea on something!

By: Jay Tea

Jay Tea — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:43:46 +0000

Eric, take it a bit further. I LOATHE what their TV network has done. “Fox — where good sci-fi goes to die.” They’ve killed more great shows than… well, it’s a lot.

By: Eric Sipple

Eric Sipple — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:21:09 +0000

LOL. Well, at the very least their film studio blow goats, too.

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:07:56 +0000

I clearly disagree.

By: Eric Sipple

Eric Sipple — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:19:30 +0000

Eh, I think Jay’s got a fair point. Wallace’s comment was pretty specific and the performance of News Corp doesn’t necessarily reflect on how Fox News is doing.

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:11:03 +0000

Except Wallace made his comments in the context of the larger argument about the media biz, and the parent of Fox – News Corp. – is in the media biz.

By: Jay Tea

Jay Tea — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:57:36 +0000

Wallace said Fox News is doing great.

Fox News IS doing great.

Wallace said nothing about Fox News’ parent organization.

I work for a company that’s taken a bit of a downturn. My particular portion is doing fine — we’re making money, we’re hiring. No contradiction there.

And no contradiction in what Wallace said.