More right wing paranoia as GOP chairman Michael Steele insists that he and Sarah Palin and anti-abortion activists are being videotaped and having their names written down…
Breaking News
Oprah Quitting TV Show In 2011
Black Helicopter Watch: Michael Steele Says He’s Being Followed!
April 17th, 2009
23 Comments
This seems slightly out of context.
pssssssst Mr Steele …..Those are called reporters.
LOL you have got to be kidding me.
Uhmmm I think those people are called REPORTERS
It’s probably the RNC donors trying to get their $180,000 worth of clothes back.
When will someone put Michael Steele out of his misery and tell him
his wingnut buddies are no longer holding his beloved pets hostage in Texas–so he can stop embarrassing himself now.
If you’ve nothing wrong, why are you worried? Right?
Steele didn’t seem to have a farking problem with his ex-boss, Robert Ehrlich, surveilling death-penalty opponents and anti-war activists.
Where’s my bag of damn Oreos?
Code Yellow.
Code Yellow.
Hansel and Gretel have escaped the Gingerbread House.
I repeat, Hansel and Gretel have escaped the Gingerbread House.
There will always be a bull market for aluminum with all the tin-foil the wrong wingers consume
Isn’t Steele pro-choice?
And I’m sure there aren’t several “progressives” with their cameras on hand just dying to catch Steele or Palin in a “Macaca moment?”
It is rather silly, though… it’s redundant. The press will cheerfully do the work on behalf of the progressives. Just like they cheerfully gloss over similar events when committed by Democrats.
J.
Right. Like Howard Dean’s scream, totally glossed over.
Jay Tea,
Steel said the “Government”.
Question where do you come up with “Progressives”?
Progressives is their new scare word attempt now. Glenn Beck started it a couple weeks ago. They realize that progressive has none of the baggage of “liberal” and are trying their damndest to make it a scare word. Problem is, America kind of likes the idea of being “progressive”.
OW I understand that I’m not a con.
I’m wondering where JAY TEA came up with saying Steel is blaming his paranoia on the government is the fault of “progressives”
I would just like to know how in his mind Steels government = Jay Teas “progressives”.
Jay Tea is a professional con artist.
His mind invents whatever is convenient to push his fictions.
Which is exactly what makes Jay Tea a perfect right wing leader.
Without Jay Tea’s lies, and the brigade of right wing liars like him, the more decent Republican voters might clue into the Big Lie that the Republicans have been telling over and over and over.
And the last thing right wingers want is voters paying attention to the FACTS, let alone mountains of evidence, that consistently contradict the right wing’s false assertions.
By the way, Jay Tea, I made a special point of reading one of your fellow war crime apologist’s blog post over at Commentary Magazine.
Do the cesspool of commenters at Commentary Magazine usually read like Stormfront?
It was amazing how many sadists were celebrating torture at Commentary Magazine. Some of them even seemed to be hinting at a final solution for Muslims.
Seriously rancid stuff you’ve associated yourself with Jay Tea.
The press will cheerfully do the work on behalf of the progressives…
You mean report. God I hope they do that, seeing is that is their job. I thought people were more paranoid when they are IN power.
I would just like to know you get from this quote from Steel, “I’m sure there was somebody in the room with a notepad and a camera taking snapshots and writing down names. But that’s not the place our government needs to be.”
To “Progressives” being out to catch Steel up in the inevitable con “Macaca moment”?
Jay Tea?
Thayer, Steele already has had several Macaca moments…such as his claim of having Oreos thrown at him at Morgan University (”Thick in the air, like locusts”)…remember that? Or, more recently, his growing a pair of balls and standing up to Rushbo. For all of two minutes.
BTW Jay, congrats for having one of your columns picked up by a national newspaper. Too bad said paper was the credibility-free New York Post.
J.G.Thayer: “And I’m sure there aren’t several ‘progressives’ with their cameras on hand just dying to catch Steele or Palin in a ‘Macaca moment?’”
And the conservatives are organizing to do the same. Interesting how you left that out.
“It is rather silly, though… it’s redundant. The press will cheerfully do the work on behalf of the progressives. Just like they cheerfully gloss over similar events when committed by Democrats.”
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Oh… You were serious.
Bringing up the Myth of the Liberal Media is a sign of how desperate you are.
“credibility-free New York Post.”
Has Murdoch’s New York Post ever made a profit?
A 2005 Business Week magazine article says Murdoch’s Post was losing money for a long time.
Is the Post still just a propaganda smear sheet for Murdoch to throw money at, like Scaife or the Republican Messiah Moons newspapers?
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_08/b3921114_mz016.htm
For that matter, I still haven’t seen anything to suggest that Commentary Magazine is anything more than a money losing propaganda outfit. Right up there with WND and Stormfront.
NR, remember some years ago when the NY Post, at that time NOT owned by Murdoch, was about to be sold to a company that also owned the “liberal” Amsterdam (NYC) News? The editorial staff threw a public tantrum, replacing an ENTIRE day’s news section with pieces bitching and moaning about the sale. That was when Congress voted to give Murdoch a waiver from the FCC media-ownership laws, allowing him to “save” the Post.
I still have that issue…funny as all hell.
[...] who spoke at an anti-abortion rally in Indiana this past week, said he was “sure” that the government spied on the event: They’ve got their eye on the 3,000 Americans who assembled in Indiana last [...]