Comments on: 2009 Redskins Schedule

By: Crusty Dem

Crusty Dem — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:48:09 +0000

Oliver, if you watched the Bears closely, you wouldn’t say that.. It’s bad to have a mediocre QB, but to randomly fluctuate between three lousy QBs is truly awful. Cutler won’t put up the numbers he did in Denver, but he’ll do enough to make the Bears much, much better (and remember, the NFC central is pretty awful, they should go at least 5-1 in division). They’ll need a couple breaks to go far, but they should have a good regular season…

By: Bruce

Bruce — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:13:46 +0000

I think we need Bill Nye the Science Guy even now to explain the physics of the photo of this post.

By: Parthenon

Parthenon — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:31:26 +0000

Only two non-playoff teams in the second half. Kind of brutal.

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:20:41 +0000

Meanwhile, Cutler leads the Bears to a 12-4 season.
I almost feel like I should put money betting against that. I think Cutler will be the bust of the year. Bears may still have winning season, but not worth the booty they put up for him.

By: Athenae

Athenae — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:02:27 +0000

Ow. OWWW. Boobs don’t work that way.

By: liberalrob

liberalrob — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:46:44 +0000

Pom-poms, Quaker. Very nice ones, too.

Redskins/Cowboys for Thanksgiving and Christmas. Coincidence?

By: ed

ed — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:44:04 +0000

Those are fake.

By: I'm a Hick

I'm a Hick — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:06:41 +0000

Which may be more games than the Astros win.

By: I'm a Hick

I'm a Hick — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:05:29 +0000

Oh, I get it!

The consensus here is the Texans should go 9-7 at worst.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:59:29 +0000

What? They’re NOT footballs?

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:48:39 +0000

Aha! The old hidden ball trick!

By: joaquin

joaquin — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:10:30 +0000

Yeah you’re right TB at home is a win. 3-4 at the BYE.

By: Crusty Dem

Crusty Dem — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:06:53 +0000

STL, @Det, KC are very likely wins; @NYG, @Car are likely losses; TB and Phi are in between. 2-5 at the bye is as pessimistic as 6-1 is optimistic.. If I had to bet, I’d be very confident in either 4-3 or 5-2.

By: merl

merl — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:02:53 +0000

Seahawks announced their’s also. They are not going to have any prime time games at all.
Maybe they’ve realized how much they suck

By: joaquin

joaquin — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:55:53 +0000

Sorry , but I see them at 2-5 before the BYE week and 3-6 in the second half. 5 maybe 6 wins at best.

By: Facebones

Facebones — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:45:42 +0000

Really? Skins play Panthers, Bucs, Giants and EAGLES! and you are seriously thinking 6-1? If you get all the breaks, all the calls, and all the bounces, you’ll be lucky to be at 4-3!

Can’t wait for Sept. 13th? Careful what you wish for.

By: jr

jr — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:31:49 +0000

Aqua Netist Mel Kiper thinks the Redskins will end up with Mark Sanchez

By: Crusty Dem

Crusty Dem — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:51:24 +0000

7-0? Wow, somebody is feeling the optimism of the off-season. If they’re 5-2 at the bye, that’s pretty good. Of course, after beating the Raiders to get to 8-5, they’ll lose the last three to go 8-8…

Meanwhile, Cutler leads the Bears to a 12-4 season.