2009 Redskins Schedule

2:29 am EST April 15th, 2009 | Sports | 18 Comments

This was clearly the most important story of the week.

1 Sun, Sept. 13 at New York Giants FOX 4:15 p.m.

2 Sun, Sept. 20 vs. St. Louis Rams FOX 1 p.m.

redskins cheerleader3 Sun, Sept. 27 at Detroit Lions FOX 1 p.m.

4 Sun, Oct. 4 vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers FOX 1 p.m.

5 Sun, Oct. 11 at Carolina Panthers FOX 1 p.m.

6 Sun, Oct. 18 vs. Kansas City Chiefs CBS 1 p.m.

7 Mon, Oct. 26 vs. Philadelphia Eagles ESPN 8:30 p.m.

8 Bye

9 Sun, Nov. 8 at Atlanta Falcons FOX 1 p.m.

10 Sun, Nov. 15 vs. Denver Broncos CBS 1 p.m.

11 Sun, Nov. 22 at Dallas Cowboys FOX 1 p.m.

12 Sun, Nov. 29 at Philadelphia Eagles FOX 1 p.m.

13 Sun, Dec. 6 vs. New Orleans Saints FOX 1 p.m.

14 Sun, Dec. 13 at Oakland Raiders FOX 4:05 p.m.

15 Mon, Dec. 21 vs. New York Giants ESPN 8:30 p.m.

16 Sun, Dec. 27 vs. Dallas Cowboys NBC 8:20 p.m.

17 Sun, Jan. 3 at San Diego Chargers FOX 4:15 p.m.

I have to wait until NOVEMBER for a Dallas game? You’re killing me NFL. Although with a first game against the Giants, that should be an early sign of whether the Skins will leave me crying. And based on their records last season, the first 7 weeks of the Skins schedule seems mighty SOFT. They could be in 7-0, 6-1 territory (famous last words). And the bye week is at just the right point in the season, though if we somehow get on a 7-0 roll it could be dicey.

Oh, September 13th, you can’t get here fast enough…

Topic: ,

Related Posts

«
»

18 Responses to “2009 Redskins Schedule”

  1. Crusty Dem says:
    April 15, 2009 at 2:51 am

    7-0? Wow, somebody is feeling the optimism of the off-season. If they’re 5-2 at the bye, that’s pretty good. Of course, after beating the Raiders to get to 8-5, they’ll lose the last three to go 8-8…

    Meanwhile, Cutler leads the Bears to a 12-4 season.

  2. jr says:
    April 15, 2009 at 3:31 am

    Aqua Netist Mel Kiper thinks the Redskins will end up with Mark Sanchez

  3. Facebones says:
    April 15, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    Really? Skins play Panthers, Bucs, Giants and EAGLES! and you are seriously thinking 6-1? If you get all the breaks, all the calls, and all the bounces, you’ll be lucky to be at 4-3!

    Can’t wait for Sept. 13th? Careful what you wish for.

  4. joaquin says:
    April 15, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    Sorry , but I see them at 2-5 before the BYE week and 3-6 in the second half. 5 maybe 6 wins at best.

  5. merl says:
    April 15, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Seahawks announced their’s also. They are not going to have any prime time games at all.
    Maybe they’ve realized how much they suck

  6. Crusty Dem says:
    April 15, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    STL, @Det, KC are very likely wins; @NYG, @Car are likely losses; TB and Phi are in between. 2-5 at the bye is as pessimistic as 6-1 is optimistic.. If I had to bet, I’d be very confident in either 4-3 or 5-2.

  7. joaquin says:
    April 15, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    Yeah you’re right TB at home is a win. 3-4 at the BYE.

  8. Quaker in a Basement says:
    April 15, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    Aha! The old hidden ball trick!

  9. Quaker in a Basement says:
    April 15, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    What? They’re NOT footballs?

  10. I'm a Hick says:
    April 15, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    Oh, I get it!

    The consensus here is the Texans should go 9-7 at worst.

  11. I'm a Hick says:
    April 15, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    Which may be more games than the Astros win.

  12. ed says:
    April 15, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    Those are fake.

  13. liberalrob says:
    April 15, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    Pom-poms, Quaker. Very nice ones, too.

    Redskins/Cowboys for Thanksgiving and Christmas. Coincidence?

  14. Athenae says:
    April 16, 2009 at 1:02 am

    Ow. OWWW. Boobs don’t work that way.

    A.

  15. Oliver Willis says:
    April 16, 2009 at 3:20 am

    Meanwhile, Cutler leads the Bears to a 12-4 season.
    I almost feel like I should put money betting against that. I think Cutler will be the bust of the year. Bears may still have winning season, but not worth the booty they put up for him.

  16. Parthenon says:
    April 16, 2009 at 3:31 am

    Only two non-playoff teams in the second half. Kind of brutal.

  17. Bruce says:
    April 16, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    I think we need Bill Nye the Science Guy even now to explain the physics of the photo of this post.

  18. Crusty Dem says:
    April 17, 2009 at 2:48 am

    Oliver, if you watched the Bears closely, you wouldn’t say that.. It’s bad to have a mediocre QB, but to randomly fluctuate between three lousy QBs is truly awful. Cutler won’t put up the numbers he did in Denver, but he’ll do enough to make the Bears much, much better (and remember, the NFC central is pretty awful, they should go at least 5-1 in division). They’ll need a couple breaks to go far, but they should have a good regular season…