Fox News’ Neil Cavuto Caught In A Lie
Tweet
Neil Cavuto insists that his network, Fox News, will give the tea party protests (sponsored by Fox News) the same fair coverage they gave to the Million Man March… except Fox News wasn’t on air when the Million Man March occurred.
Fox News: What Normal People Call “Lying”, We Call “Reporting”.
5 Responses to “Fox News’ Neil Cavuto Caught In A Lie”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

I’m not sure this was a case of lying, as it was a case of Cavuto not having a clue as to what he’s talking about. I seriously doubt Cavuto would be brazen enough to claim something as true that he must know can easily discovered (by, say, spending literally seconds on an Internet search) to be false.
Back in my younger days I was Chairman of the committee that, among many other things, adjudicated complaints made against student organizations. One fraternity was cited for hazing its pledges and we had a member of that same fraternity on the committee. He swore that he had a great respect for his responsibilities and could remain impartial and did not recuse himself. And, in an overabundance of willingness to actually be impartial, the committee allowed him to stay.
We were stoopid.
Those who are insistent that they can remain impartial when they have a conflict of interest are, at best, deluded and, far more likely, liars who are looking forward to not being impartial at all.
A con lie?
Say it aint so!
No, it’s a lie. He’s not that clueless. He’s been at Fox News since the beginning. He knows.
Oh wait. It looks like the article was updated saying that the error was acknowledged and corrected and making reference to the follow-up marches.
damn.