<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox News Cuts &amp; Pastes From Anti Abortion Group Press Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143870</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143870</guid>
		<description>Fred Clark of slacktivist had a great writeup in his Left Behind series when he discussed the all too common evangelical trope of &lt;a href=&quot;http://slacktivist.typepad.com/slacktivist/2007/04/lb_why_doctors_.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;PP&#039;s financial interest in more abortions.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

For someone like Jay Tea, who&#039;s neither a pro-lifer nor (AFAICT) particularly religious, he sets himself up as particularly vulnerable to being a victim of evangelical right-wing talking points that make no sense except to those who would be particularly gullible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Clark of slacktivist had a great writeup in his Left Behind series when he discussed the all too common evangelical trope of <a href="http://slacktivist.typepad.com/slacktivist/2007/04/lb_why_doctors_.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;PP&#8217;s financial interest in more abortions.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>For someone like Jay Tea, who&#8217;s neither a pro-lifer nor (AFAICT) particularly religious, he sets himself up as particularly vulnerable to being a victim of evangelical right-wing talking points that make no sense except to those who would be particularly gullible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143814</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143814</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;imagine what women would be resorting to without them.&lt;/em&gt;

Well done, crusty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>imagine what women would be resorting to without them.</em></p>
<p>Well done, crusty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crusty Dem</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143805</link>
		<dc:creator>Crusty Dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143805</guid>
		<description>Jay, you said &quot;I understand why Planned Parenthood is so eager to ignore that law. Abortion is big business for them.&quot;

No.  Their big business is in testing and birth control.  Abortion is a loser, counting for less than 3% of services.  Additionally, while their expenditures for medical services are $588 million, they charge $357 million total for them.  They did well in 2006, thanks to grants and private donations, but saying that &quot;Abortion is big business for them&quot; is idiotic.

I&#039;d have no problems preaching the glories of PP, abortions or not.  If you don&#039;t believe it, imagine what women would be resorting to without them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, you said &#8220;I understand why Planned Parenthood is so eager to ignore that law. Abortion is big business for them.&#8221;</p>
<p>No.  Their big business is in testing and birth control.  Abortion is a loser, counting for less than 3% of services.  Additionally, while their expenditures for medical services are $588 million, they charge $357 million total for them.  They did well in 2006, thanks to grants and private donations, but saying that &#8220;Abortion is big business for them&#8221; is idiotic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have no problems preaching the glories of PP, abortions or not.  If you don&#8217;t believe it, imagine what women would be resorting to without them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143798</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143798</guid>
		<description>Maybe the PP employees didn&#039;t alert the cops because they (correctly) did not believe that the two liars, Rose and Stollar, were actually underaged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the PP employees didn&#8217;t alert the cops because they (correctly) did not believe that the two liars, Rose and Stollar, were actually underaged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143796</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143796</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As Strowbridge pointed out to his detriment, there has to be an INTENT to deceive to constitute lying. Here, the intentional deception is not on PP&#039;s part, so they&#039;re safe. The girls did intend to deceive, so they would be the ones who would be charged.&lt;/i&gt;

Assuming, of course, that the girls told the police the truth, which they wouldn&#039;t have. They probably would have said that they told PP that they were college students. And then come the crocodile tears...

Look, Jay, I can see that the idea of women having the final say over whether or not they remain pregnant. And that&#039;s fine (well, not really). However, you&#039;re making the big fallacy that they wouldn&#039;t get abortions if they were illegal. Your thinking that women take abortion lightly really speaks volumes about you, and nothing good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As Strowbridge pointed out to his detriment, there has to be an INTENT to deceive to constitute lying. Here, the intentional deception is not on PP&#8217;s part, so they&#8217;re safe. The girls did intend to deceive, so they would be the ones who would be charged.</i></p>
<p>Assuming, of course, that the girls told the police the truth, which they wouldn&#8217;t have. They probably would have said that they told PP that they were college students. And then come the crocodile tears&#8230;</p>
<p>Look, Jay, I can see that the idea of women having the final say over whether or not they remain pregnant. And that&#8217;s fine (well, not really). However, you&#8217;re making the big fallacy that they wouldn&#8217;t get abortions if they were illegal. Your thinking that women take abortion lightly really speaks volumes about you, and nothing good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackburn5</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143777</link>
		<dc:creator>blackburn5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143777</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97N9JVCmjYU

i have to say, that looks pretty sketchy on Planned Parenthood&#039;s part. i wouldn&#039;t send my daughters there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s the video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97N9JVCmjYU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97N9JVCmjYU</a></p>
<p>i have to say, that looks pretty sketchy on Planned Parenthood&#8217;s part. i wouldn&#8217;t send my daughters there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143742</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143742</guid>
		<description>J.G.Thayer: &quot;Tell me that that doesn&#039;t give you pause. Say that you have no problem with over 1,100 abortions a day, almost 300,000 a year -- and that&#039;s just counting PP.&quot;

You know what reaction I have to seeing that number? How much lower would that be with real sex education? Maybe if PP wasn&#039;t demonized by the right and people used their services more &lt;I&gt;before&lt;/I&gt; they had sex, there wouldn&#039;t be so many abortions. 

&quot;I&#039;d like to see Roe v. Wade struck down, because it&#039;s simply bad law...&quot;

Why? Why is it bad law?

&quot;Tell us how wonderful every single one of them is.&quot;

Strawman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.G.Thayer: &#8220;Tell me that that doesn&#8217;t give you pause. Say that you have no problem with over 1,100 abortions a day, almost 300,000 a year &#8212; and that&#8217;s just counting PP.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know what reaction I have to seeing that number? How much lower would that be with real sex education? Maybe if PP wasn&#8217;t demonized by the right and people used their services more <i>before</i> they had sex, there wouldn&#8217;t be so many abortions. </p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d like to see Roe v. Wade struck down, because it&#8217;s simply bad law&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Why? Why is it bad law?</p>
<p>&#8220;Tell us how wonderful every single one of them is.&#8221;</p>
<p>Strawman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143732</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143732</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Say that you have no problem with over 1,100 abortions a day, almost 300,000 a year &lt;/em&gt;

OK. I have no problem with 1,100 abortions a day, almost 300,000 a year.

Happy?

For someone who is (squishily) pro-choice, you seem surprisingly alarmed by those numbers.

Now what about that &quot;major financial stake&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Say that you have no problem with over 1,100 abortions a day, almost 300,000 a year </em></p>
<p>OK. I have no problem with 1,100 abortions a day, almost 300,000 a year.</p>
<p>Happy?</p>
<p>For someone who is (squishily) pro-choice, you seem surprisingly alarmed by those numbers.</p>
<p>Now what about that &#8220;major financial stake&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143729</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143729</guid>
		<description>Quaker, PP performed about 290,000 abortions in a single year. By my math (and feel free to correct it), presuming 250 business days in a year (I guesstimated and rounded to make it a convenient number -- that&#039;s 50 5-day weeks), that&#039;s almost 1,160 a DAY. 

Tell me that that doesn&#039;t give you pause. Say that you have no problem with over 1,100 abortions a day, almost 300,000 a year -- and that&#039;s just counting PP.

Those are the numbers. That is the reality. That is the expression of &quot;choice.&quot;

I&#039;d like to see Roe v. Wade struck down, because it&#039;s simply bad law, and the matter returned to the several states. Let the people decide, through their legislators, what they want the law to be. I don&#039;t know precisely where I&#039;d come down on that, but most lkely in favor of some reasonable restrictions (parental notification (but not necessarily approval) for minors, no public funding, and some limits on how late in the pregnancy, for example), but fight like hell against outright bans or onerous limits.

Bet feel free to preach the glories of &quot;choice&quot; and the wonders of an organization that performs over a quarter of a million abortions in a single year. Tell us how wonderful every single one of them is.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker, PP performed about 290,000 abortions in a single year. By my math (and feel free to correct it), presuming 250 business days in a year (I guesstimated and rounded to make it a convenient number &#8212; that&#8217;s 50 5-day weeks), that&#8217;s almost 1,160 a DAY. </p>
<p>Tell me that that doesn&#8217;t give you pause. Say that you have no problem with over 1,100 abortions a day, almost 300,000 a year &#8212; and that&#8217;s just counting PP.</p>
<p>Those are the numbers. That is the reality. That is the expression of &#8220;choice.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see Roe v. Wade struck down, because it&#8217;s simply bad law, and the matter returned to the several states. Let the people decide, through their legislators, what they want the law to be. I don&#8217;t know precisely where I&#8217;d come down on that, but most lkely in favor of some reasonable restrictions (parental notification (but not necessarily approval) for minors, no public funding, and some limits on how late in the pregnancy, for example), but fight like hell against outright bans or onerous limits.</p>
<p>Bet feel free to preach the glories of &#8220;choice&#8221; and the wonders of an organization that performs over a quarter of a million abortions in a single year. Tell us how wonderful every single one of them is.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143719</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143719</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;One&#039;s position on abortion should be irrelevant in being appalled by their actions.&lt;/em&gt;

One&#039;s stated views on abortion may be belied by comparing the number of abortions to the number of combat fatalities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>One&#8217;s position on abortion should be irrelevant in being appalled by their actions.</em></p>
<p>One&#8217;s stated views on abortion may be belied by comparing the number of abortions to the number of combat fatalities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143717</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143717</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The circumstantial evidence regarding Planned Parenthood, however, shows that they don&#039;t agree, and have a serious financial stake in more abortions, and are willing to ignore the law to provide &#039;em.&lt;/em&gt;

Serious financial stake? What percentage of their operating revenue comes from abortions, Mr. Tea? If abortions were outlawed tomorrow, would PP close its doors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The circumstantial evidence regarding Planned Parenthood, however, shows that they don&#8217;t agree, and have a serious financial stake in more abortions, and are willing to ignore the law to provide &#8216;em.</em></p>
<p>Serious financial stake? What percentage of their operating revenue comes from abortions, Mr. Tea? If abortions were outlawed tomorrow, would PP close its doors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143711</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143711</guid>
		<description>Jay, it is a bizarre right-wing trope that PP position on abortion is all about their financial stake and interest in having more and more abortions. Seriously, this is the sort of urban-legend fundangelical-e-mail-forward sort of craziness stuff here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, it is a bizarre right-wing trope that PP position on abortion is all about their financial stake and interest in having more and more abortions. Seriously, this is the sort of urban-legend fundangelical-e-mail-forward sort of craziness stuff here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143704</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143704</guid>
		<description>J.G.Thayer: &quot;Strowbridge, go back to your movies. Leave reality up to those who can deal with it.&quot;

The reality is, PP did nothing wrong. These were college-age women, not 15-year old girls who were molested. There&#039;s nothing in the law books that says you have to report to the police when college-age women pretend to be 15-year olds looking for abortions. 

&quot;The circumstantial evidence regarding Planned Parenthood, however, shows that they don&#039;t agree, and have a serious financial stake in more abortions, and are willing to ignore the law to provide &#039;em.&quot;

Speaking of having no relationship to reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.G.Thayer: &#8220;Strowbridge, go back to your movies. Leave reality up to those who can deal with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reality is, PP did nothing wrong. These were college-age women, not 15-year old girls who were molested. There&#8217;s nothing in the law books that says you have to report to the police when college-age women pretend to be 15-year olds looking for abortions. </p>
<p>&#8220;The circumstantial evidence regarding Planned Parenthood, however, shows that they don&#8217;t agree, and have a serious financial stake in more abortions, and are willing to ignore the law to provide &#8216;em.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of having no relationship to reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143700</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143700</guid>
		<description>Quaker, I am squishily pro-choice. I actually believe what Bill Clinton said (apparently more than he did): abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.

The circumstantial evidence regarding Planned Parenthood, however, shows that they don&#039;t agree, and have a serious financial stake in more abortions, and are willing to ignore the law to provide &#039;em.

One&#039;s position on abortion should be irrelevant in being appalled by their actions.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker, I am squishily pro-choice. I actually believe what Bill Clinton said (apparently more than he did): abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.</p>
<p>The circumstantial evidence regarding Planned Parenthood, however, shows that they don&#8217;t agree, and have a serious financial stake in more abortions, and are willing to ignore the law to provide &#8216;em.</p>
<p>One&#8217;s position on abortion should be irrelevant in being appalled by their actions.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaius Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143696</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaius Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143696</guid>
		<description>Ha! I thought that they were against cloning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I thought that they were against cloning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143687</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143687</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I&#039;m so confused.&lt;/i&gt;

I think I get it. This Mona Lisa Project hoo-haw, Live Action whatever, Fox and Jay are just being dicks for the sake of being dicks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I&#8217;m so confused.</i></p>
<p>I think I get it. This Mona Lisa Project hoo-haw, Live Action whatever, Fox and Jay are just being dicks for the sake of being dicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143686</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143686</guid>
		<description>For the most part, this should be a lesson to you, Jay Tea: what you tend to get outraged about is rarely anything related to the &quot;news.&quot; Rather, you tend to get worked into a frenzy over something cooked up by a special-interest group for the purpose of getting your dander up. I think you should take this as a lesson that, contrary to your personal beliefs about being well-informed, you tend to serve as just a useful idiot for various right-wing activist and propaganda outlets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part, this should be a lesson to you, Jay Tea: what you tend to get outraged about is rarely anything related to the &#8220;news.&#8221; Rather, you tend to get worked into a frenzy over something cooked up by a special-interest group for the purpose of getting your dander up. I think you should take this as a lesson that, contrary to your personal beliefs about being well-informed, you tend to serve as just a useful idiot for various right-wing activist and propaganda outlets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolai</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143683</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143683</guid>
		<description>The point of going to PP is that it&#039;s a refuge that young women can RELY on, and rely on the fact that cops, parents, etc will NOT be called. What is so damned great about busting a 15 year old girl crying out for help?

Which brings up another point; It&#039;s pretty easy to tell a 27yr old from a 15 yr old. I bet the PP personel thought; &quot;Why is this young woman who is at LEAST 18-20 yrs old pretending she&#039;s 15? Oh well, we get all types in here and ours is not to reason why, but to HELP, so help we will.&quot; 

The bottom line is that the fundies and faux news don&#039;t care about reason or apathy towards folks who might have different beliefs, they see their warped agenda as the only solution, you know, like the final solution that Hitler so espoused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of going to PP is that it&#8217;s a refuge that young women can RELY on, and rely on the fact that cops, parents, etc will NOT be called. What is so damned great about busting a 15 year old girl crying out for help?</p>
<p>Which brings up another point; It&#8217;s pretty easy to tell a 27yr old from a 15 yr old. I bet the PP personel thought; &#8220;Why is this young woman who is at LEAST 18-20 yrs old pretending she&#8217;s 15? Oh well, we get all types in here and ours is not to reason why, but to HELP, so help we will.&#8221; </p>
<p>The bottom line is that the fundies and faux news don&#8217;t care about reason or apathy towards folks who might have different beliefs, they see their warped agenda as the only solution, you know, like the final solution that Hitler so espoused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143678</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143678</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so confused.

Wasn&#039;t Mr. Tea telling us just a couple of weeks ago that he&#039;s actually pro-choice?

Yet he&#039;s so quick to compare the number of abortions performed to combat casualties and feign outrage that a reproductive rights organization values the privacy of its clients over the meddling of politicians.

I just can&#039;t make sense of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so confused.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t Mr. Tea telling us just a couple of weeks ago that he&#8217;s actually pro-choice?</p>
<p>Yet he&#8217;s so quick to compare the number of abortions performed to combat casualties and feign outrage that a reproductive rights organization values the privacy of its clients over the meddling of politicians.</p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t make sense of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpymann</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/18/fox-news-cuts-pastes-from-anti-abortion-group-press-release/#comment-143676</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpymann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13617#comment-143676</guid>
		<description>Jay Tea,

Um.... Yeah that was my point. 

Ya hit the nail right on the head. 
Glad you took the time to ferret it out. Thanks for making my silly English statement and translated it into pure con, where the meaning of my muddled statement can be warped to mean something that was not intended, nor implied. 

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Tea,</p>
<p>Um&#8230;. Yeah that was my point. </p>
<p>Ya hit the nail right on the head.<br />
Glad you took the time to ferret it out. Thanks for making my silly English statement and translated it into pure con, where the meaning of my muddled statement can be warped to mean something that was not intended, nor implied. </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

