Comments on: NBC Goes On Cramer Lockdown

By: Ron

Ron — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:22:59 +0000

While I enjoy watching Cramer every night, one must remember the show is primarily entertainment. The financial networks exist to promote their advertisers financial and investment products. Who would expect them to warn about the credit bubble or coming Washington national debt collapse which will destroy much of the remaining private wealth in America today or what this will do to the dollar, the stock market, bonds, gold or the real estate market?

China is now worried about their dangerous over investment in US Treasury obligations. Washington ’s long-term choice is either repudiation or monetization. For monetization to be effective, the depreciation in the dollar would have to be substantial and this in turn would dramatically raise prices of imports for American consumers which would mean a tremendous drop in foreign imports. Debt monetization would cause more disruption to exporting nations than selective repudiation of Treasury debt.

The Campaign to Cancel the Washington National Debt By 12/22/2013 Constitutional Amendment is starting now in the U.S. See: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=67594690498&ref=ts

Thanks,

Ron with 30 plus years in the investment business and banking industry.

By: Jack J.

Jack J. — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:54:48 +0000

I like matt621, his emotional handicaps make me laugh.

I just pity the person that has to change his diaper!

By: calling all toasters

calling all toasters — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:19:02 +0000

Wow–a troll on acid.

By: Jaim

Jaim — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:56:06 +0000

Shorter matt621: My party is fucked, so let me grab last year’s talking points since I’ve got nothing else.

By: mike in dc

mike in dc — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:54:47 +0000

To be fair, Rachel Maddow did mention the segment without airing any of it.

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:13:16 +0000

When things aren’t going your way, switch the topic to something you can talk about.

And still not have a clue.

By: Scott Ricketts

Scott Ricketts — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:06:39 +0000

And nice way to change the subject as well, another great Republican trick. When things aren’t going your way, switch the topic to something you can talk about.

By: Sean D. Martin

Sean D. Martin — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:10:21 +0000

matt621:
Tony Rezko? I don’t know what you’re talking about.
Bill Ayers? Never heard of him.
Jeremiah…Wright, you say? Who’s that?
Rod Blagojevich? Doesn’t ring a bell.
George Obama? Can’t say I’m familiar with that name…
Zeituni…Zeituni… sorry, drawing a blank…

Completely Republican phenomenon. Absolutely. No doubt whatsoever.

You’re demonstrating another essentially Republican trait: Say things that simply aren’t true as if they were facts.

Oliver’s already commented about Wright. Ayers, as another example, never had any substantial relationship with Obama. Controversy about him wasn’t ignored because it was embarrassing, it was dismissed because it was irrelevant.

By: matt621

matt621 — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:54:44 +0000

Death of a Straw Man by Oliver Willis

Bravo! Bravo!!

Encore! Encore!!

I’m sure we won’t have to wait long for the next performance. 5 nights a week, Tuesdays off and twice on Sundays.

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:51:21 +0000

Yeah, the media never covered Jeremiah Wright, thats why Obama had to make a major speech about it. He just spontaneously did so and it wasn’t prompted by wall to wall coverage of Wright’s rants. No sireee.

By: matt621

matt621 — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:28:36 +0000

Tony Rezko? I don’t know what you’re talking about.

Bill Ayers? Never heard of him.

Jeremiah…Wright, you say? Who’s that?

Rod Blagojevich? Doesn’t ring a bell.

George Obama? Can’t say I’m familiar with that name…

Zeituni…Zeituni… sorry, drawing a blank…

Completely Republican phenomenon. Absolutely. No doubt whatsoever.

By: Danko Ramone

Danko Ramone — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:01:07 +0000

They’re following the Republican way…if you don’t like it, pretend it didn’t happen.