<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How They Roll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:34:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142538</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142538</guid>
		<description>Dennis the Bigot: &quot;Even more sanctimony from Strowbridge.
Angry too. How shocking.&quot;

And you didn&#039;t even try argue against my point. 

There is a difference between calling a woman fat and calling her skinny. Or calling a man fat. 

There are nuances in life that you are just not mentally equipped to handle. You need a black &amp; white world view, which is why you are a conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis the Bigot: &#8220;Even more sanctimony from Strowbridge.<br />
Angry too. How shocking.&#8221;</p>
<p>And you didn&#8217;t even try argue against my point. </p>
<p>There is a difference between calling a woman fat and calling her skinny. Or calling a man fat. </p>
<p>There are nuances in life that you are just not mentally equipped to handle. You need a black &amp; white world view, which is why you are a conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142516</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142516</guid>
		<description>Dennis, Laura Ingram would call your mother fat if she could get away with it.

&lt;i&gt;working with, dealing with, writing with and worshiping with radical assholes&lt;/i&gt;

Your right to express any outrage over that ended somewhere around the election season of 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, Laura Ingram would call your mother fat if she could get away with it.</p>
<p><i>working with, dealing with, writing with and worshiping with radical assholes</i></p>
<p>Your right to express any outrage over that ended somewhere around the election season of 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142497</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142497</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And now he defends Meghan McCain because she takes the easy route for her to notoriety by announcing she is going to take on Ann Coulter, knowing full well she gets the full media attention when she does it.&lt;/i&gt;

I like how expressing one&#039;s opinion (i.e., I don&#039;t get Ann Coulter&#039;s schtick) is &quot;taking her on.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And now he defends Meghan McCain because she takes the easy route for her to notoriety by announcing she is going to take on Ann Coulter, knowing full well she gets the full media attention when she does it.</i></p>
<p>I like how expressing one&#8217;s opinion (i.e., I don&#8217;t get Ann Coulter&#8217;s schtick) is &#8220;taking her on.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142469</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142469</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Far, far greater minds than yours and mine disagree on that, Duros.&lt;/i&gt;

Yours, maybe.

&lt;i&gt;I quoted the douchebag Dr. Hussein Matt up above because I know the guy well. He’s the equivalent of you and Strowbridge at Think Progress. A disingenous, sanctimonious little WATB who would never condone trying to get along with the other side if his life depended on it. I’ve read a thousand times the guy telling people there is no middle ground, that the middle ground is for pussies. And now he defends Meghan McCain because she takes the easy route for her to notoriety by announcing she is going to take on Ann Coulter, knowing full well she gets the full media attention when she does it. So when Dr. Matt announces that he hopes Laura Ingraham gets a reoccurence of cancer and feels sorry that Meghan McCain was dumped on, knowing full well that he’d be far worse on McCain if she had defended Coulter on the liberal Daily Beast site where she blogs, he’d be giving her far worse treatment than Ingraham did. And so would you and Strowbridge.&lt;/i&gt;

So your argument is that Dr. Hussein Matt is a hypocrite, since he would treat McCain differently if the situation was different? Say it isn&#039;t so!

&lt;i&gt;Shorter Dennis: A certain 20th Century German leader made the trains run on time!&lt;/i&gt;

Mussolini was Italian.

&lt;i&gt;On a sanctimony scale of 1-10, this statement registers a 12.&lt;/i&gt;

Translation: &quot;Sure I kill puppies, but if you call me a puppy-killer, you&#039;re being sanctimonious.&quot;

Face it, Dennis, Laura&#039;s an America-hating asshole, and so are you. There&#039;s nothing sanctimonious of calling a spade a spade. Deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Far, far greater minds than yours and mine disagree on that, Duros.</i></p>
<p>Yours, maybe.</p>
<p><i>I quoted the douchebag Dr. Hussein Matt up above because I know the guy well. He’s the equivalent of you and Strowbridge at Think Progress. A disingenous, sanctimonious little WATB who would never condone trying to get along with the other side if his life depended on it. I’ve read a thousand times the guy telling people there is no middle ground, that the middle ground is for pussies. And now he defends Meghan McCain because she takes the easy route for her to notoriety by announcing she is going to take on Ann Coulter, knowing full well she gets the full media attention when she does it. So when Dr. Matt announces that he hopes Laura Ingraham gets a reoccurence of cancer and feels sorry that Meghan McCain was dumped on, knowing full well that he’d be far worse on McCain if she had defended Coulter on the liberal Daily Beast site where she blogs, he’d be giving her far worse treatment than Ingraham did. And so would you and Strowbridge.</i></p>
<p>So your argument is that Dr. Hussein Matt is a hypocrite, since he would treat McCain differently if the situation was different? Say it isn&#8217;t so!</p>
<p><i>Shorter Dennis: A certain 20th Century German leader made the trains run on time!</i></p>
<p>Mussolini was Italian.</p>
<p><i>On a sanctimony scale of 1-10, this statement registers a 12.</i></p>
<p>Translation: &#8220;Sure I kill puppies, but if you call me a puppy-killer, you&#8217;re being sanctimonious.&#8221;</p>
<p>Face it, Dennis, Laura&#8217;s an America-hating asshole, and so are you. There&#8217;s nothing sanctimonious of calling a spade a spade. Deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142466</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142466</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Dennis if you want to defend Coulter go for it. If you want to defend Ingraham go for it.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s how Dennis rolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Dennis if you want to defend Coulter go for it. If you want to defend Ingraham go for it.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s how Dennis rolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142439</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142439</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Our country just elected a man President that’s spent his entire life working with, dealing with, writing with and worshiping with radical assholes and you don’t have the slightest problem with that.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, no. Not until he himself does or says something radical. I&#039;m quite fortunate to belong to a culture that judges people generally based on &lt;b&gt;their own&lt;/b&gt; actions and words, rather than those of the people around them.

I&#039;m skeptical as to how great somebody&#039;s mind could be if that can&#039;t even grasp that very basic principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Our country just elected a man President that’s spent his entire life working with, dealing with, writing with and worshiping with radical assholes and you don’t have the slightest problem with that.</i></p>
<p>Well, no. Not until he himself does or says something radical. I&#8217;m quite fortunate to belong to a culture that judges people generally based on <b>their own</b> actions and words, rather than those of the people around them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m skeptical as to how great somebody&#8217;s mind could be if that can&#8217;t even grasp that very basic principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142434</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142434</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When you disagree with someone there are no limits to the mockery.&lt;/i&gt;

When someone lies or makes assertions based on lies or distorted facts, they deserve to be mocked on those grounds. There&#039;s very little excuse these days for not having your facts straight so it&#039;s all the more egregious when some troll here comes spouting bullshit either without any evidence or the correct facts.

Like someone who makes extreme, unsupportable statements such as &quot;Obama is a socialist who will destroy this country as we know it&quot; or &quot;Obama isn&#039;t helping small businesses but he&#039;s going to give my hard earned money to irresponsible people who took a second mortgage to build a pool in their backyard.&quot; And that guy who was giving hour by hour updates on the stock market as the most flawless and perfect barometer of Obama&#039;s presidency who suddenly didn&#039;t have much to say about the DOW this past Tues., Wed. and Thurs.

You know, stuff like that deserves to be mocked for the empty-headed bullshit it is.  

In her criticism of Coulter, Meagan McCain didn&#039;t make anything up about her or lie about her career or her personality, or, really say anything all that extreme or radical. McCain&#039;s argument against Coulter is a very straight forward and simple one: &quot;I hope viewers understand Ann Coulter is not the woman we Republicans need representing us right now.&quot; 

For that Ingraham has to go after McCain&#039;s weight on the public airwaves? Really? Seriously? This is the reasonable and rational debate you pride yourself in as a conservative? 

Dennis if you want to defend Coulter go for it. If you want to defend Ingraham go for it. But his constant concern troll bullshit is just that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When you disagree with someone there are no limits to the mockery.</i></p>
<p>When someone lies or makes assertions based on lies or distorted facts, they deserve to be mocked on those grounds. There&#8217;s very little excuse these days for not having your facts straight so it&#8217;s all the more egregious when some troll here comes spouting bullshit either without any evidence or the correct facts.</p>
<p>Like someone who makes extreme, unsupportable statements such as &#8220;Obama is a socialist who will destroy this country as we know it&#8221; or &#8220;Obama isn&#8217;t helping small businesses but he&#8217;s going to give my hard earned money to irresponsible people who took a second mortgage to build a pool in their backyard.&#8221; And that guy who was giving hour by hour updates on the stock market as the most flawless and perfect barometer of Obama&#8217;s presidency who suddenly didn&#8217;t have much to say about the DOW this past Tues., Wed. and Thurs.</p>
<p>You know, stuff like that deserves to be mocked for the empty-headed bullshit it is.  </p>
<p>In her criticism of Coulter, Meagan McCain didn&#8217;t make anything up about her or lie about her career or her personality, or, really say anything all that extreme or radical. McCain&#8217;s argument against Coulter is a very straight forward and simple one: &#8220;I hope viewers understand Ann Coulter is not the woman we Republicans need representing us right now.&#8221; </p>
<p>For that Ingraham has to go after McCain&#8217;s weight on the public airwaves? Really? Seriously? This is the reasonable and rational debate you pride yourself in as a conservative? </p>
<p>Dennis if you want to defend Coulter go for it. If you want to defend Ingraham go for it. But his constant concern troll bullshit is just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142432</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142432</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nevertheless, Ann Coulter doesn’t hold elected office, much less the office of the Presidency.&lt;/i&gt;

Might I add, neither do any of the people you mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nevertheless, Ann Coulter doesn’t hold elected office, much less the office of the Presidency.</i></p>
<p>Might I add, neither do any of the people you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142430</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142430</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Far, far greater minds than yours and mine disagree on that, Duros.&lt;/i&gt;

Really? Who? Glen Beck?

&lt;iNevertheless, Ann Coulter doesn’t hold elected office, much less the office of the Presidency.

      That’s the difference.
      Do you get that?
&lt;/i&gt;

Dude, you brought up the false equivalence. No nedd to get snitty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Far, far greater minds than yours and mine disagree on that, Duros.</i></p>
<p>Really? Who? Glen Beck?</p>
<p>&lt;iNevertheless, Ann Coulter doesn’t hold elected office, much less the office of the Presidency.</p>
<p>      That’s the difference.<br />
      Do you get that?</p>
<p>Dude, you brought up the false equivalence. No nedd to get snitty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142427</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142427</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Yes, but you see, Denny, despite all that, HE isn’t a radical asshole. That’s the difference. do you get that?&lt;/i&gt;  Duros

Far, far greater minds than yours and mine disagree on that, Duros.

Nevertheless, Ann Coulter doesn&#039;t hold elected office, much less the office of the Presidency.

That’s the difference.
Do &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; get that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes, but you see, Denny, despite all that, HE isn’t a radical asshole. That’s the difference. do you get that?</i>  Duros</p>
<p>Far, far greater minds than yours and mine disagree on that, Duros.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, Ann Coulter doesn&#8217;t hold elected office, much less the office of the Presidency.</p>
<p>That’s the difference.<br />
Do <i>you</i> get that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142420</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142420</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Instead you take the easy route and listen to the cropped audio of just the weight quote.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, like when Obama said something about Jessica Simpson to Lauer and the right jumped on a misread transcript for 3 days? Like that?

&lt;i&gt;Our country just elected a man President that’s spent his entire life working with, dealing with, writing with and worshiping with radical assholes and you don’t have the slightest problem with that.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, but you see, Denny, despite all that, HE isn&#039;t a radical asshole. 

That&#039;s the difference. 
do you get that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Instead you take the easy route and listen to the cropped audio of just the weight quote.</i></p>
<p>Oh, like when Obama said something about Jessica Simpson to Lauer and the right jumped on a misread transcript for 3 days? Like that?</p>
<p><i>Our country just elected a man President that’s spent his entire life working with, dealing with, writing with and worshiping with radical assholes and you don’t have the slightest problem with that.</i></p>
<p>Yes, but you see, Denny, despite all that, HE isn&#8217;t a radical asshole. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the difference.<br />
do you get that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142417</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142417</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But when she’s right, she’s right and there’s no reason to mock her for it.&lt;/i&gt;  fafaroo

That makes no sense, fafaroo.  Ingraham doesn&#039;t think she&#039;s right.


Almost all you guys mock with impunity anyone you disagree with.  That&#039;s the point, fafaroo.  So when you think Meghan McCain is right about something, you act all shocked that someone on the right would mock her.  

You&#039;ve now admitted both your own hackery and your disingenuousness. When you disagree with someone there are no limits to the mockery.  But when you agree with a conservative, you act offended that anyone would mock her.

And, please, &#039;radical assholes at the top of our party&#039;.  Our country just elected a man President that&#039;s spent his entire life working with, dealing with, writing with and worshiping with radical assholes and you don&#039;t have the slightest problem with that.

There is no consistency whatsoever to your arguments.  Yet you call me a hack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But when she’s right, she’s right and there’s no reason to mock her for it.</i>  fafaroo</p>
<p>That makes no sense, fafaroo.  Ingraham doesn&#8217;t think she&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>Almost all you guys mock with impunity anyone you disagree with.  That&#8217;s the point, fafaroo.  So when you think Meghan McCain is right about something, you act all shocked that someone on the right would mock her.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve now admitted both your own hackery and your disingenuousness. When you disagree with someone there are no limits to the mockery.  But when you agree with a conservative, you act offended that anyone would mock her.</p>
<p>And, please, &#8216;radical assholes at the top of our party&#8217;.  Our country just elected a man President that&#8217;s spent his entire life working with, dealing with, writing with and worshiping with radical assholes and you don&#8217;t have the slightest problem with that.</p>
<p>There is no consistency whatsoever to your arguments.  Yet you call me a hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142412</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142412</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But Dennis, so you think Coulter is an asshole, do you? Really?&lt;/i&gt;

Dude, Dennis defends Rush &quot;Who cares about [black people]!&quot; Limbaugh. I bet he thinks Coulter isn&#039;t an asshole either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But Dennis, so you think Coulter is an asshole, do you? Really?</i></p>
<p>Dude, Dennis defends Rush &#8220;Who cares about [black people]!&#8221; Limbaugh. I bet he thinks Coulter isn&#8217;t an asshole either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142411</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142411</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A disingenous, sanctimonious little WATB who would never condone trying to get along with the other side if his life depended on it.&lt;/i&gt;

I bet you know that guy well (although your disingenuousness is questionable--I fear you believe the shit you write). 

Do you think it&#039;s possible that &quot;Dr. Hussein Matt&quot; is a ratfucking troll for people like you (Dennis) to promote? I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A disingenous, sanctimonious little WATB who would never condone trying to get along with the other side if his life depended on it.</i></p>
<p>I bet you know that guy well (although your disingenuousness is questionable&#8211;I fear you believe the shit you write). </p>
<p>Do you think it&#8217;s possible that &#8220;Dr. Hussein Matt&#8221; is a ratfucking troll for people like you (Dennis) to promote? I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142410</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142410</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And now he defends Meghan McCain because she takes the easy route for her to notoriety by announcing she is going to take on Ann Coulter, knowing full well she gets the full media attention when she does it.&lt;/i&gt;

Ah yes. She&#039;s only doing it for fame and fortune. There&#039;s no other reason why anyone would ever advocate that maybe, just maybe, Coulter and Limbaugh are bad for the brand. 

But no wait! Let&#039;s not just impugn her motives and attack her weight! Let&#039;s also tell her to STFU because no one wants to hear about how Ann Coulter is destroying the electoral chances of the Republican party! In fact, we need more radical assholes at the top of our party! 

Dennis, I really don&#039;t give a fuck what McCain&#039;s daughter says about most things in part because most things I&#039;ve heard her say I disagree with. But when she&#039;s right, she&#039;s right and there&#039;s no reason to mock her for it. 

But Dennis, so you think Coulter is an asshole, do you? Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And now he defends Meghan McCain because she takes the easy route for her to notoriety by announcing she is going to take on Ann Coulter, knowing full well she gets the full media attention when she does it.</i></p>
<p>Ah yes. She&#8217;s only doing it for fame and fortune. There&#8217;s no other reason why anyone would ever advocate that maybe, just maybe, Coulter and Limbaugh are bad for the brand. </p>
<p>But no wait! Let&#8217;s not just impugn her motives and attack her weight! Let&#8217;s also tell her to STFU because no one wants to hear about how Ann Coulter is destroying the electoral chances of the Republican party! In fact, we need more radical assholes at the top of our party! </p>
<p>Dennis, I really don&#8217;t give a fuck what McCain&#8217;s daughter says about most things in part because most things I&#8217;ve heard her say I disagree with. But when she&#8217;s right, she&#8217;s right and there&#8217;s no reason to mock her for it. </p>
<p>But Dennis, so you think Coulter is an asshole, do you? Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142403</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142403</guid>
		<description>Fafaroo-

I quoted the douchebag Dr. Hussein Matt up above because I know the guy well.  He&#039;s the equivalent of you and Strowbridge at Think Progress.  A disingenous, sanctimonious little WATB who would never condone trying to get along with the other side if his life depended on it.  I&#039;ve read a thousand times the guy telling people there is no middle ground, that the middle ground is for pussies. And now he defends Meghan McCain because she takes the easy route for her to notoriety by announcing she is going to take on Ann Coulter, knowing full well she gets the full media attention when she does it.  So when Dr. Matt announces that he hopes Laura Ingraham gets a reoccurence of cancer and feels sorry that Meghan McCain was dumped on, knowing full well that he&#039;d be far worse on McCain if she had defended Coulter on the liberal Daily Beast site where she blogs, he&#039;d be giving her far worse treatment than Ingraham did.  And so would you and Strowbridge.

Did the left wing blogs gain in popularity these last four years by being nice and telling the assholes in their party to STFU and try to get along?

I don&#039;t think so.  So please stop with the sanctimony and the disingenuousness, fafaroo.  It doesn&#039;t wear well with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fafaroo-</p>
<p>I quoted the douchebag Dr. Hussein Matt up above because I know the guy well.  He&#8217;s the equivalent of you and Strowbridge at Think Progress.  A disingenous, sanctimonious little WATB who would never condone trying to get along with the other side if his life depended on it.  I&#8217;ve read a thousand times the guy telling people there is no middle ground, that the middle ground is for pussies. And now he defends Meghan McCain because she takes the easy route for her to notoriety by announcing she is going to take on Ann Coulter, knowing full well she gets the full media attention when she does it.  So when Dr. Matt announces that he hopes Laura Ingraham gets a reoccurence of cancer and feels sorry that Meghan McCain was dumped on, knowing full well that he&#8217;d be far worse on McCain if she had defended Coulter on the liberal Daily Beast site where she blogs, he&#8217;d be giving her far worse treatment than Ingraham did.  And so would you and Strowbridge.</p>
<p>Did the left wing blogs gain in popularity these last four years by being nice and telling the assholes in their party to STFU and try to get along?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so.  So please stop with the sanctimony and the disingenuousness, fafaroo.  It doesn&#8217;t wear well with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142402</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142402</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are you admitting that you didn’t do that already, and that’s not hackery on your part?&lt;/i&gt;

Shorter Dennis: A certain 20th Century German leader made the trains run on time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are you admitting that you didn’t do that already, and that’s not hackery on your part?</i></p>
<p>Shorter Dennis: A certain 20th Century German leader made the trains run on time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142398</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142398</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Gosh, Dennis, would you like to take the time to link to the serious and thoughtful portions of Ingraham’s comments?&lt;/i&gt;  fafaroo

Are you admitting that you didn&#039;t do that already, and that&#039;s not hackery on your part?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Gosh, Dennis, would you like to take the time to link to the serious and thoughtful portions of Ingraham’s comments?</i>  fafaroo</p>
<p>Are you admitting that you didn&#8217;t do that already, and that&#8217;s not hackery on your part?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142394</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142394</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If you’d taken the time to read what she said about Meghan McCain, you’d know that. Instead you take the easy route and listen to the cropped audio of just the weight quote.&lt;/i&gt;

Forget the nastiness! Forget the name calling! Laura Ingraham has a point! 

Gosh, Dennis, would you like to take the time to link to the serious and thoughtful portions of Ingraham&#039;s comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you’d taken the time to read what she said about Meghan McCain, you’d know that. Instead you take the easy route and listen to the cropped audio of just the weight quote.</i></p>
<p>Forget the nastiness! Forget the name calling! Laura Ingraham has a point! </p>
<p>Gosh, Dennis, would you like to take the time to link to the serious and thoughtful portions of Ingraham&#8217;s comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/12/how-they-roll/#comment-142389</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13505#comment-142389</guid>
		<description>Idiot hackery, dear fafaroo, is suddenly pretending to care what Meghan McCain says when you never did before.  If I was a disingenuous idiot hack like you, I would do that.

She&#039;s never said anything I felt was worth commenting about.  She&#039;s no different than most of you guys save for a famous father;  young, naive and she blogs.

And Laura Ingraham had much more to say about her than her weight.  If you&#039;d taken the time to read what she said about Meghan McCain, you&#039;d know that. Instead you take the easy route and listen to the cropped audio of just the weight quote.

Consider your own hackery before you call someone else that, fafaroo.  You&#039;re not quite as sanctimonious as Strowbridge, but you&#039;re gettin&#039; there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiot hackery, dear fafaroo, is suddenly pretending to care what Meghan McCain says when you never did before.  If I was a disingenuous idiot hack like you, I would do that.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s never said anything I felt was worth commenting about.  She&#8217;s no different than most of you guys save for a famous father;  young, naive and she blogs.</p>
<p>And Laura Ingraham had much more to say about her than her weight.  If you&#8217;d taken the time to read what she said about Meghan McCain, you&#8217;d know that. Instead you take the easy route and listen to the cropped audio of just the weight quote.</p>
<p>Consider your own hackery before you call someone else that, fafaroo.  You&#8217;re not quite as sanctimonious as Strowbridge, but you&#8217;re gettin&#8217; there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
