<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Stewart Pwns Jim Cramer &amp; NBC, CNBC, &amp; MSNBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Beer Goggler &#124; Sometimes, All It Takes Is One More Drink...</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-142178</link>
		<dc:creator>The Beer Goggler &#124; Sometimes, All It Takes Is One More Drink...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-142178</guid>
		<description>[...] Jon Stewart Pwns Jim Cramer &amp; NBC, CNBC, &amp; MSNBC (Oliver Willis) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jon Stewart Pwns Jim Cramer &amp; NBC, CNBC, &amp; MSNBC (Oliver Willis) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-142038</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-142038</guid>
		<description>Me: &quot;Clearly the GOP leaders don’t think he’s merely entertainment.&quot;

Ed: &quot;Certainly not. And as others have noted, the head of the RNC was forced to apologize for calling Mr. Limbaugh an &#039;entertainer.&#039; Did Mr. Tea not catch that? It was in all the Internets.&quot;

I keep going back and forth on whether J.G.Thayer and the rest of the Right-wingers here are morons or liars? 

I don&#039;t remember anyone on the left that is &#039;just an entertainer&#039; who could demand, and get, an apology from party leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me: &#8220;Clearly the GOP leaders don’t think he’s merely entertainment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ed: &#8220;Certainly not. And as others have noted, the head of the RNC was forced to apologize for calling Mr. Limbaugh an &#8216;entertainer.&#8217; Did Mr. Tea not catch that? It was in all the Internets.&#8221;</p>
<p>I keep going back and forth on whether J.G.Thayer and the rest of the Right-wingers here are morons or liars? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember anyone on the left that is &#8216;just an entertainer&#8217; who could demand, and get, an apology from party leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gloombergnews</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141880</link>
		<dc:creator>gloombergnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141880</guid>
		<description>Stewart/Colbert/Cramer Nation,

THE ORIGINAL FIGHT NIGHT!

Here is a Promo Poster/Image I made for Thursday&#039;s showdown! Hopefully Cramer or Stewart will see this and use it on Wednesday to promote the show!

http://gloombergnews.com/?p=470</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart/Colbert/Cramer Nation,</p>
<p>THE ORIGINAL FIGHT NIGHT!</p>
<p>Here is a Promo Poster/Image I made for Thursday&#8217;s showdown! Hopefully Cramer or Stewart will see this and use it on Wednesday to promote the show!</p>
<p><a href="http://gloombergnews.com/?p=470" rel="nofollow">http://gloombergnews.com/?p=470</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141842</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141842</guid>
		<description>Whoops.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/11/jim-cramer-shorting-stock_n_173824.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops.<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/11/jim-cramer-shorting-stock_n_173824.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/11/jim-cramer-shorting-stock_n_173824.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141841</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141841</guid>
		<description>Oh, &lt;a href=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/11/jim-cramer-shorting-stock_n_173824.htmlthis&lt;/a&gt; is awesome.
&lt;blockquote&gt; this shocking 2006 interview Jim Cramer gave to TheStreet.com&#039;s Aaron Task.

In it, the host of Mad Money says he regularly manipulated the market when he ran his hedge fund. He calls it &quot;a fun game, and it&#039;s a lucrative game.&quot; He suggests all hedge fund managers do the same. &quot;No one else in the world would ever admit that, but I could care. I am not going to say it on TV,&quot; he quips in the video.

He also calls Wall Street Journal reporters &quot;bozos&quot; and says behaving illegally is okay because the SEC doesn&#039;t understand it anyway.

Here are some gems:

-On manipulating the market: &quot;A lot of times when I was short at my hedge fund, and I was positioned short, meaning I needed it down, I would create a level of activity before hand that could drive the futures,&quot;

-On falsely creating the impression a stock is down (what he calls &quot;fomenting&quot;): &quot;You can&#039;t foment. That&#039;s a violation... But you do it anyway because the SEC doesn&#039;t understand it.&quot; He adds, &quot;When you have six days and your company may be in doubt because you are down, I think it is really important to foment.&quot;

-On the truth: &quot;What&#039;s important when you are in that hedge fund mode is to not be doing anything that is remotely truthful, because the truth is so against your view - it is important to create a new truth to develop a fiction,&quot; Cramer advises. &quot;You can&#039;t take any chances.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yup, he&#039;s an expert, all right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, &lt;a href=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/11/jim-cramer-shorting-stock_n_173824.htmlthis is awesome.</p>
<blockquote><p> this shocking 2006 interview Jim Cramer gave to TheStreet.com&#8217;s Aaron Task.</p>
<p>In it, the host of Mad Money says he regularly manipulated the market when he ran his hedge fund. He calls it &#8220;a fun game, and it&#8217;s a lucrative game.&#8221; He suggests all hedge fund managers do the same. &#8220;No one else in the world would ever admit that, but I could care. I am not going to say it on TV,&#8221; he quips in the video.</p>
<p>He also calls Wall Street Journal reporters &#8220;bozos&#8221; and says behaving illegally is okay because the SEC doesn&#8217;t understand it anyway.</p>
<p>Here are some gems:</p>
<p>-On manipulating the market: &#8220;A lot of times when I was short at my hedge fund, and I was positioned short, meaning I needed it down, I would create a level of activity before hand that could drive the futures,&#8221;</p>
<p>-On falsely creating the impression a stock is down (what he calls &#8220;fomenting&#8221;): &#8220;You can&#8217;t foment. That&#8217;s a violation&#8230; But you do it anyway because the SEC doesn&#8217;t understand it.&#8221; He adds, &#8220;When you have six days and your company may be in doubt because you are down, I think it is really important to foment.&#8221;</p>
<p>-On the truth: &#8220;What&#8217;s important when you are in that hedge fund mode is to not be doing anything that is remotely truthful, because the truth is so against your view &#8211; it is important to create a new truth to develop a fiction,&#8221; Cramer advises. &#8220;You can&#8217;t take any chances.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Yup, he&#8217;s an expert, all right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141835</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141835</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Clearly the GOP leaders don’t think he’s merely entertainment.&lt;/i&gt;

Certainly not. And as others have noted, the head of the RNC was forced to apologize for calling Mr. Limbaugh an &quot;entertainer.&quot; Did Mr. Tea not catch that? It was in all the Internets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Clearly the GOP leaders don’t think he’s merely entertainment.</i></p>
<p>Certainly not. And as others have noted, the head of the RNC was forced to apologize for calling Mr. Limbaugh an &#8220;entertainer.&#8221; Did Mr. Tea not catch that? It was in all the Internets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apsaras</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141831</link>
		<dc:creator>Apsaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141831</guid>
		<description>Despite Jim Cramer&#039;s many appearances across the breadth of NBC programming lately, I think it has less to do with the GE family deciding to stick up for one of its own than with producers knowing that these sorts of spats get attention and, naturally, the ratings. 

I think Stewart is having Jim Cramer on this Thursday, so that should be fun television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite Jim Cramer&#8217;s many appearances across the breadth of NBC programming lately, I think it has less to do with the GE family deciding to stick up for one of its own than with producers knowing that these sorts of spats get attention and, naturally, the ratings. </p>
<p>I think Stewart is having Jim Cramer on this Thursday, so that should be fun television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141826</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141826</guid>
		<description>Oliver Willis says: &quot;What Jaytea (still) doesn’t understand is the whole basis for Limbaugh’s words being watched is that conservatives and the mainstream media don’t treat him like a carnival sideshow but as a thought leader. If conservatives treated Rush as just a circus freak we wouldn’t care, but instead they’ve put him up as - some might say the - top thinker on the right.&quot;

Didn&#039;t Rush Limbaugh interview Dick Cheney? 

Clearly the GOP leaders don&#039;t think he&#039;s merely entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver Willis says: &#8220;What Jaytea (still) doesn’t understand is the whole basis for Limbaugh’s words being watched is that conservatives and the mainstream media don’t treat him like a carnival sideshow but as a thought leader. If conservatives treated Rush as just a circus freak we wouldn’t care, but instead they’ve put him up as &#8211; some might say the &#8211; top thinker on the right.&#8221;</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t Rush Limbaugh interview Dick Cheney? </p>
<p>Clearly the GOP leaders don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s merely entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141821</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141821</guid>
		<description>What Jaytea (still) doesn&#039;t understand is the whole basis for Limbaugh&#039;s words being watched is that &lt;em&gt;conservatives&lt;/em&gt; and the mainstream media don&#039;t treat him like a carnival sideshow but as a thought leader. If &lt;em&gt;conservatives&lt;/em&gt; treated Rush as just a circus freak we wouldn&#039;t care, but instead they&#039;ve put him up as - some might say the - top thinker on the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Jaytea (still) doesn&#8217;t understand is the whole basis for Limbaugh&#8217;s words being watched is that <em>conservatives</em> and the mainstream media don&#8217;t treat him like a carnival sideshow but as a thought leader. If <em>conservatives</em> treated Rush as just a circus freak we wouldn&#8217;t care, but instead they&#8217;ve put him up as &#8211; some might say the &#8211; top thinker on the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141820</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141820</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; like Cramer comes off here.&lt;/i&gt;

Ah, like a petulant little WATB bitch. Gotcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> like Cramer comes off here.</i></p>
<p>Ah, like a petulant little WATB bitch. Gotcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141818</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141818</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Folks attacking Rush Limbaugh, take note. This is how you are being seen — like Cramer comes off here.&lt;/i&gt;

Seen by whom, exactly? Dildos? Jackasses? Right-wing dipshits? &quot;Dittoheads&quot;? Oh noes! 

I seem to recall a similar evisceration of Mr. Limbaugh by the same Mr. Stewart just a few days ago. Did you miss that one? You could probably Google it if you did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Folks attacking Rush Limbaugh, take note. This is how you are being seen — like Cramer comes off here.</i></p>
<p>Seen by whom, exactly? Dildos? Jackasses? Right-wing dipshits? &#8220;Dittoheads&#8221;? Oh noes! </p>
<p>I seem to recall a similar evisceration of Mr. Limbaugh by the same Mr. Stewart just a few days ago. Did you miss that one? You could probably Google it if you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141817</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141817</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This is what happens when someone whose success is based on being taken seriously..&lt;/i&gt;

I mean, you&#039;re not suggesting anyone take Cramer&#039;s show seriously, with all the sound effects and &quot;Morning Zoo&quot; gew-gaws, are you?

Are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This is what happens when someone whose success is based on being taken seriously..</i></p>
<p>I mean, you&#8217;re not suggesting anyone take Cramer&#8217;s show seriously, with all the sound effects and &#8220;Morning Zoo&#8221; gew-gaws, are you?</p>
<p>Are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141816</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141816</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This is what happens when someone whose success is based on being taken seriously takes on someone whose stock in trade is entertainment&lt;/i&gt;
&#039;Kay, which one&#039;s which?

I do find it interesting, to say the least, that the entire NBC/GE network was put at Cramer&#039;s disposal to defend him.
That must be the &quot;librul media&quot; in action, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This is what happens when someone whose success is based on being taken seriously takes on someone whose stock in trade is entertainment</i><br />
&#8216;Kay, which one&#8217;s which?</p>
<p>I do find it interesting, to say the least, that the entire NBC/GE network was put at Cramer&#8217;s disposal to defend him.<br />
That must be the &#8220;librul media&#8221; in action, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyP</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141815</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141815</guid>
		<description>From now on I will always order coffee &quot;white and bitter.&quot; Tee hee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From now on I will always order coffee &#8220;white and bitter.&#8221; Tee hee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141814</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141814</guid>
		<description>Rush Limbaugh is a mere entertainer?  Then why did RNC Chair Michael Steele correct his thought-crime against Chairman Rushbo?

Hmm, your talking points are always lame Jay, but at least try some from 2009 instead of 2005 (Coulter was joking about Jews being future Christians!  Rush was joking about, well, being a bigot!  Amirite?)

This is what happens when conservatism fails, more than anything else.  This is what happens when chickenhawk apparatchiks like you, after receiving Socialist health-care to remain alive, realize they&#039;ve got nothing left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh is a mere entertainer?  Then why did RNC Chair Michael Steele correct his thought-crime against Chairman Rushbo?</p>
<p>Hmm, your talking points are always lame Jay, but at least try some from 2009 instead of 2005 (Coulter was joking about Jews being future Christians!  Rush was joking about, well, being a bigot!  Amirite?)</p>
<p>This is what happens when conservatism fails, more than anything else.  This is what happens when chickenhawk apparatchiks like you, after receiving Socialist health-care to remain alive, realize they&#8217;ve got nothing left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141813</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141813</guid>
		<description>Brilliant.

This is what happens when someone whose success is based on being taken seriously takes on someone whose stock in trade is entertainment -- the entertainer almost always wins.

Folks attacking Rush Limbaugh, take note. This is how you are being seen -- like Cramer comes off here.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant.</p>
<p>This is what happens when someone whose success is based on being taken seriously takes on someone whose stock in trade is entertainment &#8212; the entertainer almost always wins.</p>
<p>Folks attacking Rush Limbaugh, take note. This is how you are being seen &#8212; like Cramer comes off here.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141811</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141811</guid>
		<description>Shorter joaquin: You poopyheads don&#039;t know Funny! I know Funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorter joaquin: You poopyheads don&#8217;t know Funny! I know Funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141810</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141810</guid>
		<description>One man&#039;s two-bit comic is another&#039;s valuable political/social critic, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One man&#8217;s two-bit comic is another&#8217;s valuable political/social critic, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mambochicken23</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141809</link>
		<dc:creator>mambochicken23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141809</guid>
		<description>joaquin, you cannot be a real human being.  No one is as stupid as you.  It&#039;s unpossible, I tells ya.

Jon Stewart is one of the funniest, smartest guys on TV right now.  He has a comedy show, but tackles news and goes after powerful people saying and doing idiotic things better than almost anyone.  He has a sharp eye for hypocrisy.  He makes fun of both sides of the aisle, despite undeniably being partisan.  Getting back to Jaim&#039;s comment - his dismantling of those assholes on Crossfire is one of the greatest things I have ever seen on television, ever.  

Now maybe you can tell us why we shouldn&#039;t admire him.  You fucking idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joaquin, you cannot be a real human being.  No one is as stupid as you.  It&#8217;s unpossible, I tells ya.</p>
<p>Jon Stewart is one of the funniest, smartest guys on TV right now.  He has a comedy show, but tackles news and goes after powerful people saying and doing idiotic things better than almost anyone.  He has a sharp eye for hypocrisy.  He makes fun of both sides of the aisle, despite undeniably being partisan.  Getting back to Jaim&#8217;s comment &#8211; his dismantling of those assholes on Crossfire is one of the greatest things I have ever seen on television, ever.  </p>
<p>Now maybe you can tell us why we shouldn&#8217;t admire him.  You fucking idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apsaras</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/11/jon-stewart-pwns-jim-cramer-nbc-cnbc-msnbc/#comment-141807</link>
		<dc:creator>Apsaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13441#comment-141807</guid>
		<description>The jig is up! joaquin has finally uncovered our tendency to find funny people doing funny things funny! Game over, man.

Though if Stewart is a &quot;2-bit comic&quot;, I&#039;m curious who joaquin might consider worth the full dollar. Someone whose name rhymes with Mary the Stable Guy perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jig is up! joaquin has finally uncovered our tendency to find funny people doing funny things funny! Game over, man.</p>
<p>Though if Stewart is a &#8220;2-bit comic&#8221;, I&#8217;m curious who joaquin might consider worth the full dollar. Someone whose name rhymes with Mary the Stable Guy perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

