<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservative Blog Does Good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:01:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SFC B</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141729</link>
		<dc:creator>SFC B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141729</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always heard it as &quot;Salute the rank, not the man&quot;.  Maybe other branches say it differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always heard it as &#8220;Salute the rank, not the man&#8221;.  Maybe other branches say it differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Quaker</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141505</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Quaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141505</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I read this morning that Chuck Norris is fomenting revolution in Texas.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;d say he could have it, except that I have some very good friends down there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I read this morning that Chuck Norris is fomenting revolution in Texas.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;d say he could have it, except that I have some very good friends down there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack J.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141488</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141488</guid>
		<description>C.h.u.c.k N.o.r.r.i.s...that&#039;s how you spell &quot;washed up&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C.h.u.c.k N.o.r.r.i.s&#8230;that&#8217;s how you spell &#8220;washed up&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141475</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141475</guid>
		<description>On an only tangentially related side note, I read this morning that Chuck Norris is fomenting revolution in Texas. The funny made my eyes bleed, I&#039;ll tell you what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On an only tangentially related side note, I read this morning that Chuck Norris is fomenting revolution in Texas. The funny made my eyes bleed, I&#8217;ll tell you what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141470</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141470</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;They also have a tradition best summed up as &quot;salute the uniform.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

I don&#039;t get it, Mr. Tea. What are you implying here? You&#039;re not saying the video is &quot;fake but accurate&quot; are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>They also have a tradition best summed up as &#8220;salute the uniform.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it, Mr. Tea. What are you implying here? You&#8217;re not saying the video is &#8220;fake but accurate&#8221; are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141469</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141469</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;They also have a tradition best summed up as </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>They also have a tradition best summed up as</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crusty Dem</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141423</link>
		<dc:creator>Crusty Dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141423</guid>
		<description>Read the comments generated by Greyhawk&#039;s corrections.  Vile stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the comments generated by Greyhawk&#8217;s corrections.  Vile stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athenae</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141420</link>
		<dc:creator>Athenae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141420</guid>
		<description>From the comments over there: 

&lt;i&gt;CNN is not really well known for their criticism of Democratic presidents.&lt;/i&gt;

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the comments over there: </p>
<p><i>CNN is not really well known for their criticism of Democratic presidents.</i></p>
<p>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.</p>
<p>A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack J.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141417</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141417</guid>
		<description>What branch of the military and for how long did you serve, Jay T.?  I served 20 years.

I&#039;m just trying to understand your understanding of how the military works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What branch of the military and for how long did you serve, Jay T.?  I served 20 years.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just trying to understand your understanding of how the military works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141413</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141413</guid>
		<description>Every time I read something like this, it makes me realize:
the feeling of rage and disgust that seeing #43 produced in me is now being felt by _these people_ upon seeing #44.

It is to regular schadenfreude what a fine cognac is to grape juice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I read something like this, it makes me realize:<br />
the feeling of rage and disgust that seeing #43 produced in me is now being felt by _these people_ upon seeing #44.</p>
<p>It is to regular schadenfreude what a fine cognac is to grape juice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141388</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141388</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;the vast majority of the military takes their oaths very seriously. They also have a tradition best summed up as “salute the uniform.”&lt;/i&gt;

Whoa, JT, does this mean that LIKE ME, you are a veteran?  Or does it mean that you read that somewhere, because I never heard &quot;salute the uniform&quot; when I was in the Army.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>the vast majority of the military takes their oaths very seriously. They also have a tradition best summed up as “salute the uniform.”</i></p>
<p>Whoa, JT, does this mean that LIKE ME, you are a veteran?  Or does it mean that you read that somewhere, because I never heard &#8220;salute the uniform&#8221; when I was in the Army.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Hooper</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141370</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141370</guid>
		<description>Why do we even need a conspiracy theory? The time between Obama&#039;s announcement is really short; I&#039;m fairly convinced that Obama&#039;s focus isn&#039;t on foreign affairs right now (to say his domestic troubles are pressing is an understatement.) I suspect that, rather than simply ignoring foreign affairs, he&#039;s giving Hillary Clinton a lot of leeway. (I&#039;m sure that that theory fills you with dismay, Jay, but leaving the personalities and politicos aside it&#039;s not a bad management strategy.)

But I digress. To suggest that the army has an alternative motive for troop deployment - a complex affair that has a fair amount of inertia - is the result of conspiracy puts the onus on the theorizer. What evidence is there that this is a conspiracy? Cui bono? Does Iraq need a Stryker Brigade really badly right now? (Not if the media reports are correct). Are troop rotations changing enough to cause some extra holes in logistics in Iraq? (Dunno.) Is Iraq being used as a training ground for Afghanistan? (Not a bad idea.) 

Me, I&#039;m still wrestling with the fact that a friend of mine&#039;s deploying to Afghanistan. She&#039;s a SeeBee. I can&#039;t figure out which ship she&#039;ll be deploying to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we even need a conspiracy theory? The time between Obama&#8217;s announcement is really short; I&#8217;m fairly convinced that Obama&#8217;s focus isn&#8217;t on foreign affairs right now (to say his domestic troubles are pressing is an understatement.) I suspect that, rather than simply ignoring foreign affairs, he&#8217;s giving Hillary Clinton a lot of leeway. (I&#8217;m sure that that theory fills you with dismay, Jay, but leaving the personalities and politicos aside it&#8217;s not a bad management strategy.)</p>
<p>But I digress. To suggest that the army has an alternative motive for troop deployment &#8211; a complex affair that has a fair amount of inertia &#8211; is the result of conspiracy puts the onus on the theorizer. What evidence is there that this is a conspiracy? Cui bono? Does Iraq need a Stryker Brigade really badly right now? (Not if the media reports are correct). Are troop rotations changing enough to cause some extra holes in logistics in Iraq? (Dunno.) Is Iraq being used as a training ground for Afghanistan? (Not a bad idea.) </p>
<p>Me, I&#8217;m still wrestling with the fact that a friend of mine&#8217;s deploying to Afghanistan. She&#8217;s a SeeBee. I can&#8217;t figure out which ship she&#8217;ll be deploying to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141353</guid>
		<description>Strowbridge, I understand you&#039;re used to being contradicted, but I wasn&#039;t this time. I was expanding on what you said. OF COURSE the military is going to be respectful and loyal to the president. That&#039;s the nature of our military -- they take very serious oaths, and take those oaths very seriously.

But that doesn&#039;t mean they have to like or respect the individual who holds the office. That&#039;s what I was explaining -- in the military, you salute the uniform, not the individual.

And Greyhawk&#039;s explanation for the Stryker Shuffle Obama is pulling makes a lot of sense. You got a better one?

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strowbridge, I understand you&#8217;re used to being contradicted, but I wasn&#8217;t this time. I was expanding on what you said. OF COURSE the military is going to be respectful and loyal to the president. That&#8217;s the nature of our military &#8212; they take very serious oaths, and take those oaths very seriously.</p>
<p>But that doesn&#8217;t mean they have to like or respect the individual who holds the office. That&#8217;s what I was explaining &#8212; in the military, you salute the uniform, not the individual.</p>
<p>And Greyhawk&#8217;s explanation for the Stryker Shuffle Obama is pulling makes a lot of sense. You got a better one?</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141349</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141349</guid>
		<description>J.G.Thayer: &quot;Oh, and Strowbridge: the vast majority of the military takes their oaths very seriously. They also have a tradition best summed up as &#039;salute the uniform.&#039;&quot;

Yeah. And where in my posts did I say otherwise? Where in my post did I even hint otherwise? 

&quot;For example, they recently caught Obama playing political games with troop deployments...&quot;

Yes, I especially like the part where he says he doesn&#039;t like conspiracy theories, and then engages in one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.G.Thayer: &#8220;Oh, and Strowbridge: the vast majority of the military takes their oaths very seriously. They also have a tradition best summed up as &#8217;salute the uniform.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah. And where in my posts did I say otherwise? Where in my post did I even hint otherwise? </p>
<p>&#8220;For example, they recently caught Obama playing political games with troop deployments&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, I especially like the part where he says he doesn&#8217;t like conspiracy theories, and then engages in one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141342</guid>
		<description>Yeah, those Mudville guys do some damned fine work. For example, they recently caught Obama playing political games with troop deployments (www.mudvillegazette.com/031615.html). And their reporting on the Abu Ghraib mess was superb.

Oh, and Strowbridge: the vast majority of the military takes their oaths very seriously. They also have a tradition best summed up as &quot;salute the uniform.&quot;

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, those Mudville guys do some damned fine work. For example, they recently caught Obama playing political games with troop deployments (www.mudvillegazette.com/031615.html). And their reporting on the Abu Ghraib mess was superb.</p>
<p>Oh, and Strowbridge: the vast majority of the military takes their oaths very seriously. They also have a tradition best summed up as &#8220;salute the uniform.&#8221;</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/09/conservative-blog-does-good/#comment-141304</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13402#comment-141304</guid>
		<description>Kudos indeed. 

To say the military doesn&#039;t support the president in an insult to the military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos indeed. </p>
<p>To say the military doesn&#8217;t support the president in an insult to the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
