<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Geraghty And The Latest In Moral Equivalence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:43:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140802</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140802</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Limbaugh took his lumps and didn’t whine.&lt;/i&gt;

About WHAT?  He whines for three hours a day every damn day.  This is the most industrial whiner on the planet.  Nobody gets paid more to whine than Rush Limbaugh, and nobody enjoys doing it more.

Which of his opposing attitudes about drug users (before and after the bust) do you subscribe to?  Do you think that anyone who wasn&#039;t a rich celebrity would have skated away from that charge, which included money laundering?  He actually was found guilty, and his sentence was whatever is less severe than noogies, I think it was a stern look from a magistrate and a promise not to pull wings off of flies.

Then of course there was the time he was caught smuggling boner pills into and out of the Dominican Republic, even though he left his girlfriend at home.  He didn&#039;t even take his golf clubs on a quickie vacation to the sex-tourist capital of the Third World.

Wait.  Women can&#039;t stand him, so there is no &quot;girlfriend.&quot;  Where do you suppose he was putting the results of his &quot;hard&quot; drugs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Limbaugh took his lumps and didn’t whine.</i></p>
<p>About WHAT?  He whines for three hours a day every damn day.  This is the most industrial whiner on the planet.  Nobody gets paid more to whine than Rush Limbaugh, and nobody enjoys doing it more.</p>
<p>Which of his opposing attitudes about drug users (before and after the bust) do you subscribe to?  Do you think that anyone who wasn&#8217;t a rich celebrity would have skated away from that charge, which included money laundering?  He actually was found guilty, and his sentence was whatever is less severe than noogies, I think it was a stern look from a magistrate and a promise not to pull wings off of flies.</p>
<p>Then of course there was the time he was caught smuggling boner pills into and out of the Dominican Republic, even though he left his girlfriend at home.  He didn&#8217;t even take his golf clubs on a quickie vacation to the sex-tourist capital of the Third World.</p>
<p>Wait.  Women can&#8217;t stand him, so there is no &#8220;girlfriend.&#8221;  Where do you suppose he was putting the results of his &#8220;hard&#8221; drugs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140637</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140637</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“Oh, that’s right, conservatives can’t be victims.”&lt;/i&gt;

Well, according to Ann Coulter, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“Oh, that’s right, conservatives can’t be victims.”</i></p>
<p>Well, according to Ann Coulter, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD100</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140588</link>
		<dc:creator>PD100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140588</guid>
		<description>Lest we forget:

&quot;And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.&quot;
-Big Pharma, 1995.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lest we forget:</p>
<p>&#8220;And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.&#8221;<br />
-Big Pharma, 1995.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140516</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140516</guid>
		<description>Jay Tea says: &quot;Hey, Oliver, in case you didn’t hear, the maker of Oxycontin was fined most of a billion dollars over its lying about and concealing just how incredibly addictive the stuff was. So, wouldn’t that make Limbaugh a victim of Big Pharma?&quot;

Yes. But he is still a hypocrite. 

&quot;Oh, that’s right, conservatives can’t be victims.&quot;

Which strawman&#039;s ass did you pull that out of?

On the other hand, I have heard conservatives say you should regulate the pharmaceutical industry as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Tea says: &#8220;Hey, Oliver, in case you didn’t hear, the maker of Oxycontin was fined most of a billion dollars over its lying about and concealing just how incredibly addictive the stuff was. So, wouldn’t that make Limbaugh a victim of Big Pharma?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. But he is still a hypocrite. </p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, that’s right, conservatives can’t be victims.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which strawman&#8217;s ass did you pull that out of?</p>
<p>On the other hand, I have heard conservatives say you should regulate the pharmaceutical industry as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140511</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140511</guid>
		<description>Hey, Oliver, in case you didn&#039;t hear, the maker of Oxycontin was fined most of a billion dollars over its lying about and concealing just how incredibly addictive the stuff was. So, wouldn&#039;t that make Limbaugh a victim of Big Pharma?

Oh, that&#039;s right, conservatives can&#039;t be victims. Besides, Limbaugh took his lumps and didn&#039;t whine. Unlike, say, Congressman Patrick Kennedy (D-RI) (and we only wish he was &quot;dry&quot;). Or countless other prominent Democrats whose battles with substance abuse have been lauded as &quot;courageous&quot; and &quot;inspiring.&quot; 

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Oliver, in case you didn&#8217;t hear, the maker of Oxycontin was fined most of a billion dollars over its lying about and concealing just how incredibly addictive the stuff was. So, wouldn&#8217;t that make Limbaugh a victim of Big Pharma?</p>
<p>Oh, that&#8217;s right, conservatives can&#8217;t be victims. Besides, Limbaugh took his lumps and didn&#8217;t whine. Unlike, say, Congressman Patrick Kennedy (D-RI) (and we only wish he was &#8220;dry&#8221;). Or countless other prominent Democrats whose battles with substance abuse have been lauded as &#8220;courageous&#8221; and &#8220;inspiring.&#8221; </p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140506</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140506</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Crutches&lt;/b&gt;

Looks like it&#039;s not just nicotine that Obama is addicted to.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/05/obama-cant-break-the-teleprompter-habit-either/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama can’t break the teleprompter habit, either. &lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Obama’s reliance on the teleprompter is unusual – not only because he is famous for his oratory, but because no other president has used one so consistently and at so many events large and small.

After the teleprompter malfunctioned a few times last summer and Obama delivered some less-than-soaring speeches, reports surfaced that he was training to wean himself off of the device while on vacation in Hawaii. But no luck.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Crutches</b></p>
<p>Looks like it&#8217;s not just nicotine that Obama is addicted to.</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/05/obama-cant-break-the-teleprompter-habit-either/" rel="nofollow">Obama can’t break the teleprompter habit, either. </a></p>
<p><i>Obama’s reliance on the teleprompter is unusual – not only because he is famous for his oratory, but because no other president has used one so consistently and at so many events large and small.</p>
<p>After the teleprompter malfunctioned a few times last summer and Obama delivered some less-than-soaring speeches, reports surfaced that he was training to wean himself off of the device while on vacation in Hawaii. But no luck.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140492</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140492</guid>
		<description>Also, Limbaugh&#039;s drug problem is more recent (by about twenty YEARS) than Obama&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Limbaugh&#8217;s drug problem is more recent (by about twenty YEARS) than Obama&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140489</link>
		<dc:creator>freD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140489</guid>
		<description>NIKKEI 1989 38,957
NIKKEI 2009  7,200

GodDamn those Japanese Democrats straight to hell! 

Farris?  Farris?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NIKKEI 1989 38,957<br />
NIKKEI 2009  7,200</p>
<p>GodDamn those Japanese Democrats straight to hell! </p>
<p>Farris?  Farris?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140484</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140484</guid>
		<description>&quot;showing why terrorism was the defining issue in 2002 and 2004, and will be in 2006 and 2008&quot;

Wow.  That&#039;s the funniest thing I&#039;ve read all week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;showing why terrorism was the defining issue in 2002 and 2004, and will be in 2006 and 2008&#8243;</p>
<p>Wow.  That&#8217;s the funniest thing I&#8217;ve read all week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/03/05/jim-geraghty-and-the-latest-in-moral-equivalence/#comment-140450</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=13314#comment-140450</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;instinctively hawkish Americans&lt;/i&gt;

Who the hell is he talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>instinctively hawkish Americans</i></p>
<p>Who the hell is he talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
