Comments on: Murdoch’s Paper

By: gruntled atheist

gruntled atheist — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:34:26 +0000

I canceled my WSJ subscription when Murdock bought the paper. How could anyone trust anything in a paper he owns?

By: Parthenon

Parthenon — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:15:34 +0000

Does anyone who sets up strawmen like this get any inkling of how much it weakens anything else you might say?

No. And if he was going to get it, he’d have gotten it by now. Anything like that is a red flag that screams ‘I am wasting keystrokes; everything I have to say is irrelevant.’

By: Sean D. Martin

Sean D. Martin — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:58:18 +0000

B-Dub: Unlike your beloved Master, Barack Obama

Does anyone who sets up strawmen like this get any inkling of how much it weakens anything else you might say?

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:41:41 +0000

You mean the NY Times and Washington Post who carried water for Bush into Iraq? Okay…

By: B-Dub

B-Dub — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:22:52 +0000

I’m curious what your delusional mind considers newspapers that aren’t filled with “excrement”?

The New York Times? The Washington Post?

After 5 minutes of reading your posts, it seems clear that any one who doesn’t blame conservatives and George W. Bush for every wrong that has ever occurred in the world since the dawn of time is filled with “excrement”.

By the way, don’t think just because I know for a fact that your touch with reality is completely gone, I think you should stop writing.

Unlike your beloved Master, Barack Obama, I believe in the First Amendment. Of course, now I have to assume that someone like you understands the first amendment.

Doubtful.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:56:10 +0000

C’mon, Oliver. You touted two Playboy journalists this week who had to completely retract their whole article it was so poorly researched, if not downright false.

I’d think you’d take at least a short break from judging other journalists.