Uh Oh, Time For The Right To Attack Captain Sully
Tweet
Against deregulation.
The pilot who safely ditched a jetliner in New York’s Hudson River said Tuesday that pay and benefit cuts are driving experienced pilots from careers in the cockpit.US Airways pilot Chesley ‘Sully’ Sullenberger told the House aviation subcommittee that his pay has been cut 40 percent in recent years and his pension has been terminated and replaced with a promise ‘worth pennies on the dollar’ from the federally created Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. These cuts followed a wave of airline bankruptcies after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks compounded by the current recession, he said.
‘The bankruptcies were used to by some as a fishing expedition to get what they could not get in normal times,’ Sullenberger said of the airlines. He said the problems began with the deregulation of the industry in the 1970s.
23 Responses to “Uh Oh, Time For The Right To Attack Captain Sully”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America
© 2000-2011 Oliver Willis
Can’t wait for Ann Coulter or some horrible person of her ilk to describe hero Captain Sully as “flamboyant” or similar.
We need the lowdown on the captain’s countertops!
He dares to question the religious doctrine of the Benefits Of Deregulation. Heretic!
FIFY
I have no doubt that the conservative side would attack Sully, I’m quite sure they’d attack a starving baby if it would be to their perceived benefit. But I’m missing anything in this article that indicates the right has made a peep about Sully, or his comments detailed in this post.
The Lew Rockwellites will start calling him a “parasite”
Well that’s just too bad for Sully. Even with is pay being cut, with his seniority and rank(he is a Captain), there is no doubt that he makes more than $100,000 a year. As we learned in the Wonderful World of Liberalism, anybody making 6 figures a year is RICH! So for Sully to be bitching about trying to “maintain a middle class standard of living” is laughable, because he’s part of the elite class. He makes 6 figures a year. In fact, with his two jobs, he’s probably pulling far more and should be happy to pay more taxes. Screw letting him keep more of that money to save for retirement. After all, he is rich.
Except Sully’s not being a WATB about paying his fair share of taxes. What he is against is short sighted business decisions made in the name of seeking profit over quality.
Sounds more like Sully is against federally-run pension programs.
It’s Skiles, the copilot, who said he’s working two jobs.
I heard Sully speaking this morning and thought the same thing! I’m sure that the righters were pretty shocked by his comments. Wonder what they’ll do to counteract and attempt to bring down this American hero.
Dear God,
Thank you for your sense of humor. Thank you for giving me the wonderful OliverWillis.com website to visit every day for examples of the hilarity with which you have graced the world.
What else could it be, Lord, but your will that the only possible reasoned response to this website is gut-busting, tear-stained, roll on the floor, lose control of your bladder, uncontained, window-rattling laughter?
How could it be anything but a compete and utter joke that this post about the Right being “about to attack” Capt. Sullenberger a mere 11 minutes behind a post attacking Rick Santelli, Joe Wurzelbacher and President Bush!
It can’t be anything but a fool, Lord – but still one of your creations – who would think no one would notice him condemning the use of tactics that he used himself mere moments before!
That is cosmic and timeless humor, God. And it is worthy of much praise and thanksgiving. After I’ve caught my breath and climbed back into my chair, that is.
So thank you, Lord. Thank you again for giving me liberals like Oliver Willis to laugh at every single day.
Amen.
Except Sully’s not being a WATB about paying his fair share of taxes. What he is against is short sighted business decisions made in the name of seeking profit over quality.
He’s making an issue of his pay and blaming it on poor relations between unions and the airlines which he says started with reregulation. According to you, somebody in his salary range is rich. Therefore he has nothing to complain about.
But getting back to the issue at hand, the deregulation that Sully is talking about goes back to the Airline Deregulation Act and had nothing to do with the airlines seeking “profit over quality.” In fact, it was the airlines themselves that PREFERRED that current system because rigid controls were in place that assured their profitability. It was the consumer that started to get fed up with extremely high cost of airline travel. Their discontent along with the nervousness of Congress with regard to the railroads spurred action. Democratic Senator Howard Cannon introduced the legislation and Jimmy Carter signed it. The deregulation had its desired effect. Rates went down as more routes opened up and more airlines were forced to compete with newer ones.
You really should educate yourself a little bit more about these times in our history before spouting off about it.
So thank you, Lord. Thank you again for giving me liberals like Oliver Willis to laugh at every single day.
Amen. –steno
steno-
Seriously, good stuff. We all should have one good belly laugh every day and this blog thread just gave me a two-fer.
No hourly Dow updates today, Dennis?
“Well that’s just too bad for Sully. Even with is pay being cut, with his seniority and rank(he is a Captain), there is no doubt that he makes more than $100,000 a year. As we learned in the Wonderful World of Liberalism, anybody making 6 figures a year is RICH!”
Considering six figures goes up to 999,999, I’d say that’s pretty damn well off. Big difference though between say, an IT Sys admin making 100k and a Wall Streeter making 900k. Big difference, and that’s not even counting bonuses and perks.
…and you are an expert on pay scales for the airline industry? My bets are on NOT.
BTFO Sully, biotches. Go whine to your Congressmen who voted against the ARRA and yet gleefully hold out their hands for the DC Communal Wafers. High-pocrisy.
Glad to see this, actually QIBbie. I think the market was a bit taken back with Gibbs’ characterization of tonight’s speech as having a ‘Reaganesque’ quality about it.
Nice move on his part, at least as far as the stock market goes. Lessened the panic a little bit anyway, so that was a good thing.
I’m quite clear on it. Deregulation has made air travel suck, its one of the worst run businesses in the world that gets propped up time and time again. Whether Carter signed it into law or not its a conservative initiative that failed.
Big difference though between say, an IT Sys admin making 100k and a Wall Streeter making 900k. Big difference
Sure it is. But Oliver & Co. still say that the IT Sys Admin making $100K a year is rich. Simple as that.
Deregulation has made air travel suck
Deregulation was designed to make air travel less expensive. The fact that air travel sucks has nothing at all to do with deregulation. Regulation is not meant to aid your comfort. Cripes.
its one of the worst run businesses in the world that gets propped up time and time again.
Then the government should let the big players fail.
Whether Carter signed it into law or not its a conservative initiative that failed.
Oh please. Now you’re sounding idiotic as you try to pass the buck to “conservatism” instead of POOR BUSINESS PRACTICES. First you claimed the airline industry was deregulated to drive up profits and to hell with quality. I already told you that airlines were far more profitable back then. But it was also very costly to fly and only those with the means and those in business did it often. Now you’re saying airline travel sucks and deregulation is the cause and that’s a conservative thing. This is funny because if that bill was never signed, you’d be railing about the government catering to THE RICH by not doing something to “lower ticket prices.”
You don’t have a freaking clue as to what you’re pontificating about.
Deregulation caused consolidation as it so often does and the airlines made more profits but were also more vulnerable to swings in the economy. That conservatism led, as it usually does, to poor business practices – short term gain for long term pain.
Yes an IT Sys Admin with $100k/year is rich (no matter how many times you try to make a six figure salary into poverty it won’t work), and I hope for them to make more money if they can earn it. But I also think they should pay their fair share in taxes. Try to have more than 1 idea in your head at a time.
$100K a year is still a pretty good income and I doubt that you’d be forced to shop at 99cent plus. You sure aren’t hurting as much as those making half that. In NYC you’d be modestly getting by but in Iowa you’d be well off.
Sorry Matt but you make as much sense as a rubber nail.
What’s with the bitterness, still hurting over the thumping you 20%’ers took? Get over it.
My fellow Jay points out:
Democratic Senator Howard Cannon introduced the legislation and Jimmy Carter signed it.
To which Oliver responds:
its a conservative initiative that failed.
No, Oliver, it was a POPULIST initiative that failed. As Jay noted, airline deregulation was pushed by people who thought that air travel was too expensive. It was about de-elitizing (is that a word? It should be) air travel and opening it up for the masses. It was about making air travel affordable to everyone, so — to cite a personal example — I can fly from New Hampshire to Baltimore and back for less than $150.
It was not done for big business, which LOVED the regulatory climate that protected them from the vagaries of the free market.
Sully has an opinion on it. It’s even an informed, professional opinion. Doesn’t make him right, but does make him worth listening to. And he’s using his recent burst of publicity to stand on his soap box over his pet issue — as noted, kind of like Joe The Plumber. But where Joe happened to be in his front yard when Obama and the press came by, Sully had a once-in-a-lifetime (if you’re lucky) moment of extreme crisis and responded heroically.
The problem is, regulation was tied to high costs of air travel. Will the American people stand for those high air fares again in exchange for improved safety standards?
Again, I don’t have a personal opinion or stake in the matter, but my answer is no, they won’t make that tradeoff. Especially when one considers that there have only been ten fatal commercial air crashes since 1995 (about one every 17 months or so), with just over 750 people killed (just under 50 a year on average).
No, I suspect it would take a major crash, with several hundred dead in a spectacular fashion (no crashes at sea), directly linkable to some aspect of airline deregulation (inexperienced flight crew, shoddy maintenance, schedule crunch, running out of fuel for penny-pinching, or something like that — I’m no expert on the particulars) to get the people to back re-regulation. And even then, they’d demand that the government subsidize it so air fares don’t return to their regulation high marks.
J.
Yes an IT Sys Admin with $100k/year is rich (no matter how many times you try to make a six figure salary into poverty it won’t work)
You know who thinks $100K isn’t rich? Oliver Willis.