GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

WTF is “Protecting the Vulnerable”?? And the numbers for the $288 billion in tax relief doesn’t make any sense. How is spending money on infrastructure projects counted as tax relief?
Open? Sure.
Sensible? Not.
How is spending money on infrastructure projects counted as tax relief?
Tax credits or tax breaks for infrastructure projects?
Just a guess.
Jay Caruso: “WTF is ‘Protecting the Vulnerable’?? And the numbers for the $288 billion in tax relief doesn’t make any sense. How is spending money on infrastructure projects counted as tax relief?”
I think this is another ‘Per 100,000′ moment.
Where does it say infrastructure projects are counted as tax relief?
CS, try reading. Click through and you’ll see what makes up the $288B in “tax relief.”
And talk about bitter clingers…..get over it already.
Pure 100% propaganda, but that’s cool. Y’all need to keep pitching this thing cause God knows………..you own it.
Hey, maybe I missed it, but is there a place to comment?
“CS, try reading. Click through and you’ll see what makes up the $288B in ‘tax relief.’”
Wow. That’s small print. Well, I have bad eyesight, so it’s small print to me.
“And talk about bitter clingers…..get over it already.”
It’s not clinging if you never answered the question, Jay.
Thanks for the pointer, Jay. I just got an article for Contentions out of that — how the bar graph and the bubbles are actually fraudulent. Almost half the “tax relief” AIN’T. The real numbers, once you factor in the small print:
$165 billion for “tax relief”
$144 billion for “state and local fiscal relief”
$126 billion for “infrastructure and science”
$142 billion for “protecting the vulnerable”
$59 billion for “health care”
$78 billion for “education and training”
$65 billion for “energy”
$8 billion for “other”
Let me fix your quote, Oliver:
“Recovery.gov is lie.”
J.
Thanks for the pointer, Jay. I just got an article for Contentions out of that — how the bar graph and the bubbles are actually fraudulent.
Oh, were you able to figure out what the footnotes meant?
Yes, Quaker. That nearly half the money under “tax relief” should have been listed under another category. I was very impressed that they were so honest about their dishonesty.
Oh, and they have some people who can make some very pretty graphs that are terrible at conveying information. But as I said elsewhere, that’s probably a bug, not a feature.
J.