That Gay Agenda Is Some Awesome Stuff
Tweet
Did you know that the gays had such insane designs on our straight society? Thank God for local conservatives, or else we would never know!
13 Responses to “That Gay Agenda Is Some Awesome Stuff”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

(In-law bitching about Obama).
Me: Yeah, I heard he’s not just gonna’ make gay marriage legal, he’s gonna make it mandatory. You better pick out someone now, so the guvmint doesn’t assign you a stranger. You and your buddy Gene would make a cute couple.
(In-law turns red).
Packaging anti-gay as religious freedom = today’s version of packaging pro-slavery as states’ rights.
FWIW, I’m all for churches being allowed to marry or not marry whomever they please, for whatever the reason. Let them just put up a ‘we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone’ sign and be done with it. So doing would utterly destroy the religious freedom argument, since they could not logically claim anyone was infringing upon their freedom of worship by forcing teh gay marriage upon their houses.
FWIW, I’m all for churches being allowed to marry or not marry whomever they please, for whatever the reason.
The irony is, of course, that all churches do not enjoy the same religious freedoms as it now stands – a gay ceremony at our Quaker meeting will not be recognized by the state. So why isn’t anyone up in arms about our right to marry people?
Hey Jeff at 11:04: I have a blast doing the same shit to one of my dittohead friends. At a Super Bowl party he dusted off the old “Obama’s gonna take my guns”. My response: “Of course he is. It will make it easier to force you to marry a gay Muslim”. Then I stood back so as not to get exploding brain matter on my good shirt.
So why isn’t anyone up in arms about our right to marry people?
Sis, “we marry none.” You know that!
oh, you know, it would just take too long to explain, “Why isn’t anyone up in arms about our right to sit in Corporate Witness whilst God marries gay couples.”
Although that last phrase might make some right wing heads explode. Hmmm…
“Why isn’t anyone up in arms about our right to sit in Corporate Witness whilst God marries gay couples.”
One more example of why Quakers love bumper stickers. When we try to say anything on our own, it comes out looking like that!
“Why isn’t anyone up in arms about our right to sit in Corporate Witness whilst God marries gay couples.”
Um. Should I be?
Duros, the original meaning got a bit lost in translation. This entire argument that legalizing gay marriage somehow impinges on religious freedom completely ignores the religious freedom of faiths that do marry gays. Why won’t the state recognize a Quaker gay marriage, the same way it recognizes a Quaker straight marriage? What about our religious freedoms, hmmm?
Why won’t the state recognize a Quaker gay marriage, the same way it recognizes a Quaker straight marriage? What about our religious freedoms, hmmm?
Maybe I’m still not getting it. If the state doesn’t recognize gay marriage no matter WHO performs it, how does that impinge on the religious freedoms of you or any other denomination?
I mean, I’m outraged, sure. Not sure where to point it.
I was trying (unsuccessfully I see) to make a point about the ridiculousness of the entire argument that making gay marriage legally recognized somehow infringes on the religious freedoms of the conservative church.
Oh.
Well…..yeah.
Or did I answer my own question?
If the state doesn’t recognize gay marriage no matter WHO performs it, how does that impinge on the religious freedoms of you or any other denomination?