<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:59:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135689</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135689</guid>
		<description>CSS, you&#039;re so funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSS, you&#8217;re so funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135661</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135661</guid>
		<description>&quot;If that is what had happened then it would be. But, again, that wasn’t what the original article had said. The suits allege Kazeminy tried to funnel money to the company at which Coleman’s wife works. Nothing in the article said money was going directly to Coleman. &#039;Neither lawsuit alleges the money actually made it to Coleman or that the Colemans knew about the alleged plan.&#039;&quot;

The money was going to Norm Coleman&#039;s wife. 

HIS FUCKING WIFE. 

Kazeminy forced them to hire Norm Coleman&#039;s wife and pay her $75,000 for a job she was not qualified for. (A job that some reports suggest she didn&#039;t even show up for.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If that is what had happened then it would be. But, again, that wasn’t what the original article had said. The suits allege Kazeminy tried to funnel money to the company at which Coleman’s wife works. Nothing in the article said money was going directly to Coleman. &#8216;Neither lawsuit alleges the money actually made it to Coleman or that the Colemans knew about the alleged plan.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>The money was going to Norm Coleman&#8217;s wife. </p>
<p>HIS FUCKING WIFE. </p>
<p>Kazeminy forced them to hire Norm Coleman&#8217;s wife and pay her $75,000 for a job she was not qualified for. (A job that some reports suggest she didn&#8217;t even show up for.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135617</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135617</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I was referring to a liberal being opposed to one of Obama’s policies as being too liberal, or the (even remoter) possibility that a liberal might adopt a conservative position in opposition to Obama.&lt;/i&gt;

Lift with your knees, Frank. Those goalposts are heavy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I was referring to a liberal being opposed to one of Obama’s policies as being too liberal, or the (even remoter) possibility that a liberal might adopt a conservative position in opposition to Obama.</i></p>
<p>Lift with your knees, Frank. Those goalposts are heavy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135616</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135616</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You are new at this, aren’t you?&lt;/i&gt;

Would it be impolite to ask you to bite me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You are new at this, aren’t you?</i></p>
<p>Would it be impolite to ask you to bite me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135572</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135572</guid>
		<description>CSS: &lt;i&gt;He made no mention of disagreeing with Obama because Obama was too liberal. There wasn’t even a hint of that restriction in his original claim. But we are to blame for misrepresenting what he said?

Go fuck yourself, you self-righteous ass. &lt;/i&gt;

Whoa, there big fella.  Clearly you&#039;ve failed to undertand the meaning of my words.  &quot;Rather than jump on folks for intentionally misrepresenting his position, he explains that he wasn’t clear in his original post.&quot;

I wasn&#039;t suggesting anyone had misrepresented him.  I was pointing out that was a course Frank hadn&#039;t taken, that he wasn&#039;t making that claim as an excuse.  You&#039;re quick to jump on folks for misquoting you or failing to understand the meaning of your words.  You&#039;d think that might make you more interested in making sure you understood what others have said.

&lt;i&gt;Then explain how Norm Coleman’s wife getting money illegally funneled to her by one on Norm Coleman’s donors isn’t connected to Norm Coleman. &lt;/i&gt;

If that is what had happened then it would be.  But, again, that wasn&#039;t what the original article had said.  The suits allege Kazeminy tried to funnel money to the company at which Coleman’s wife works. Nothing in the article said money was going directly to Coleman.  “Neither lawsuit alleges the money actually made it to Coleman or that the Colemans knew about the alleged plan.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSS: <i>He made no mention of disagreeing with Obama because Obama was too liberal. There wasn’t even a hint of that restriction in his original claim. But we are to blame for misrepresenting what he said?</p>
<p>Go fuck yourself, you self-righteous ass. </i></p>
<p>Whoa, there big fella.  Clearly you&#8217;ve failed to undertand the meaning of my words.  &#8220;Rather than jump on folks for intentionally misrepresenting his position, he explains that he wasn’t clear in his original post.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t suggesting anyone had misrepresented him.  I was pointing out that was a course Frank hadn&#8217;t taken, that he wasn&#8217;t making that claim as an excuse.  You&#8217;re quick to jump on folks for misquoting you or failing to understand the meaning of your words.  You&#8217;d think that might make you more interested in making sure you understood what others have said.</p>
<p><i>Then explain how Norm Coleman’s wife getting money illegally funneled to her by one on Norm Coleman’s donors isn’t connected to Norm Coleman. </i></p>
<p>If that is what had happened then it would be.  But, again, that wasn&#8217;t what the original article had said.  The suits allege Kazeminy tried to funnel money to the company at which Coleman’s wife works. Nothing in the article said money was going directly to Coleman.  “Neither lawsuit alleges the money actually made it to Coleman or that the Colemans knew about the alleged plan.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135529</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135529</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rather than jump on folks for intentionally misrepresenting his position, he explains that he wasn’t clear in his original post. Rather than use that to distance himself from his comment he starts looking for the gravy.&quot;

Misrepresent his position? 

Here&#039;s what he wrote: 

&quot;If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my &#039;Condi in ‘08&#039; bumper sticker&quot;

He made no mention of disagreeing with Obama because Obama was too liberal. There wasn&#039;t even a hint of that restriction in his original claim. But we are to blame for misrepresenting what he said? 

Go fuck yourself, you self-righteous ass. 

&quot;Bravo. I can think of some others (myself included, but one other in particular) who should do the same on occasion.&quot;

Explain how Jay Caruso could admit he made a mistake, but you never admitted his &#039;per 100,000&#039; posts didn&#039;t make sense. 

Then explain how Norm Coleman&#039;s wife getting money illegally funneled to her by one on Norm Coleman&#039;s donors isn&#039;t connected to Norm Coleman. 

When you can answer those questions, and only then, can you talk about other people&#039;s behavior. 

Hypocritical asshole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rather than jump on folks for intentionally misrepresenting his position, he explains that he wasn’t clear in his original post. Rather than use that to distance himself from his comment he starts looking for the gravy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Misrepresent his position? </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what he wrote: </p>
<p>&#8220;If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my &#8216;Condi in ‘08&#8242; bumper sticker&#8221;</p>
<p>He made no mention of disagreeing with Obama because Obama was too liberal. There wasn&#8217;t even a hint of that restriction in his original claim. But we are to blame for misrepresenting what he said? </p>
<p>Go fuck yourself, you self-righteous ass. </p>
<p>&#8220;Bravo. I can think of some others (myself included, but one other in particular) who should do the same on occasion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Explain how Jay Caruso could admit he made a mistake, but you never admitted his &#8216;per 100,000&#8242; posts didn&#8217;t make sense. </p>
<p>Then explain how Norm Coleman&#8217;s wife getting money illegally funneled to her by one on Norm Coleman&#8217;s donors isn&#8217;t connected to Norm Coleman. </p>
<p>When you can answer those questions, and only then, can you talk about other people&#8217;s behavior. </p>
<p>Hypocritical asshole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135413</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135413</guid>
		<description>Rather than jump on folks for intentionally misrepresenting his position, he explains that he wasn&#039;t clear in his original post.  Rather than use that to distance himself from his comment he starts looking for the gravy.

Bravo.  I can think of some others (myself included, but one other in particular) who should do the same on occasion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than jump on folks for intentionally misrepresenting his position, he explains that he wasn&#8217;t clear in his original post.  Rather than use that to distance himself from his comment he starts looking for the gravy.</p>
<p>Bravo.  I can think of some others (myself included, but one other in particular) who should do the same on occasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135359</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135359</guid>
		<description>I must confess that I didn&#039;t expect that being MORE liberal than Obama would be construed as &quot;disagreeing&quot;. My bad -- I was referring to a liberal being opposed to one of Obama&#039;s policies as being too liberal, or the (even remoter) possibility that a liberal might adopt a conservative position in opposition to Obama.

&lt;i&gt;Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa! &lt;/i&gt;

[ Hunting for the gravy to put on the bumper sticker ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must confess that I didn&#8217;t expect that being MORE liberal than Obama would be construed as &#8220;disagreeing&#8221;. My bad &#8212; I was referring to a liberal being opposed to one of Obama&#8217;s policies as being too liberal, or the (even remoter) possibility that a liberal might adopt a conservative position in opposition to Obama.</p>
<p><i>Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa! </i></p>
<p>[ Hunting for the gravy to put on the bumper sticker ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135344</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135344</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You are new at this, aren’t you?&lt;/i&gt;

...wrote the &quot;tenets of the Laffer Curve&quot; dumbass who still can&#039;t create a hyperlink. Dumbass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You are new at this, aren’t you?</i></p>
<p>&#8230;wrote the &#8220;tenets of the Laffer Curve&#8221; dumbass who still can&#8217;t create a hyperlink. Dumbass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135327</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135327</guid>
		<description>&quot;If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my “Condi in ‘08″ bumper sticker&quot;

I agree with Hillary&#039;s health care position over Obama&#039;s. 

I think Obama shouldn&#039;t be negotiating with Republicans, as it seems clear it is a waste of time. 

I think Obama should put on a damn sweater. 

Does that count, or do I need to complain about new crap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my “Condi in ‘08″ bumper sticker&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with Hillary&#8217;s health care position over Obama&#8217;s. </p>
<p>I think Obama shouldn&#8217;t be negotiating with Republicans, as it seems clear it is a waste of time. </p>
<p>I think Obama should put on a damn sweater. </p>
<p>Does that count, or do I need to complain about new crap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135326</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135326</guid>
		<description>&quot;Always nice to start the day with a laugh. Thanks, C.&quot;

I could use a laugh as well. So could you finally explain why it was unfair for Oliver to mention Norm Coleman in the headline when one of Norm Coleman&#039;s political contributors was being sued for forcing a company to give Norm Coleman&#039;s wife a $75,000 job she wasn&#039;t qualified for? 

Or explain to me why Jay Caruso admitted he made a mistake in the &quot;Per 100,000&quot; debacle, but you never did. 

Come on. I could use the laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Always nice to start the day with a laugh. Thanks, C.&#8221;</p>
<p>I could use a laugh as well. So could you finally explain why it was unfair for Oliver to mention Norm Coleman in the headline when one of Norm Coleman&#8217;s political contributors was being sued for forcing a company to give Norm Coleman&#8217;s wife a $75,000 job she wasn&#8217;t qualified for? </p>
<p>Or explain to me why Jay Caruso admitted he made a mistake in the &#8220;Per 100,000&#8243; debacle, but you never did. </p>
<p>Come on. I could use the laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135325</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135325</guid>
		<description>SaveFarris: &quot;Cutting capital gains taxes would put an immediate jolt into the stock market, which then would carry over into the rest of the economy.&quot;

No it wouldn&#039;t. If a strong stock market meant a strong economy, then the government could simply take that $800 billion, and buy the stocks themselves. That would boost the stock markets a whole lot faster, but it would have no effect on the real economy. 

&quot;As “shovel ready” as all these projects claim to be (and doesn’t that talking point scream “focus group tested!”), I’m not buying it. There’s too many community groups, too many environmental studies, too many zoning commissions for there to be THAT many projects that can start tomorrow.&quot;

Do you know how much money needs to be spent just on basic maintenance, maintenance that has been neglected for years? And this would have the added benefit of helping the economy for years to come, because infrastructure is needed to ship goods, get people to work, etc., while these are long-term, high paying jobs. 

&quot;For 8 years, your side has been mercilessly hammering Bush and Congressional Republicans for their profligate spending. (And rightly so!) So of course, the answer is … more spending!&quot;

No. It&#039;s not the spending that is the issue, it&#039;s what they spend it on and who gets the contracts. 

They keep giving no-bid contracts to companies with political connections to people in the Bush administration. They overpay and get poor results in return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SaveFarris: &#8220;Cutting capital gains taxes would put an immediate jolt into the stock market, which then would carry over into the rest of the economy.&#8221;</p>
<p>No it wouldn&#8217;t. If a strong stock market meant a strong economy, then the government could simply take that $800 billion, and buy the stocks themselves. That would boost the stock markets a whole lot faster, but it would have no effect on the real economy. </p>
<p>&#8220;As “shovel ready” as all these projects claim to be (and doesn’t that talking point scream “focus group tested!”), I’m not buying it. There’s too many community groups, too many environmental studies, too many zoning commissions for there to be THAT many projects that can start tomorrow.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you know how much money needs to be spent just on basic maintenance, maintenance that has been neglected for years? And this would have the added benefit of helping the economy for years to come, because infrastructure is needed to ship goods, get people to work, etc., while these are long-term, high paying jobs. </p>
<p>&#8220;For 8 years, your side has been mercilessly hammering Bush and Congressional Republicans for their profligate spending. (And rightly so!) So of course, the answer is … more spending!&#8221;</p>
<p>No. It&#8217;s not the spending that is the issue, it&#8217;s what they spend it on and who gets the contracts. </p>
<p>They keep giving no-bid contracts to companies with political connections to people in the Bush administration. They overpay and get poor results in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135313</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135313</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my “Condi in ‘08″ bumper sticker&lt;/i&gt;

I disagree with him voting for the FISA bill.

Please post the video on Youtube and give us a link. Can&#039;t wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my “Condi in ‘08″ bumper sticker</i></p>
<p>I disagree with him voting for the FISA bill.</p>
<p>Please post the video on Youtube and give us a link. Can&#8217;t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135308</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135308</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Ah. But now they’re liberals?&lt;/i&gt;
Duros62

No, go back and read what I wrote.  I described Ms. Danny Noonan as &#039;left wing hero&#039;.  You even copied it.

And I described K. Parker as &#039;Another New Friend of the Left&#039;, being facetious in that the Left suddenly appreciated, fawned over, and took what she wrote seriously for the first time too &lt;a&gt;when she bailed on Palin&lt;/a&gt;.

You are new at this, aren&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ah. But now they’re liberals?</i><br />
Duros62</p>
<p>No, go back and read what I wrote.  I described Ms. Danny Noonan as &#8216;left wing hero&#8217;.  You even copied it.</p>
<p>And I described K. Parker as &#8216;Another New Friend of the Left&#8217;, being facetious in that the Left suddenly appreciated, fawned over, and took what she wrote seriously for the first time too <a>when she bailed on Palin</a>.</p>
<p>You are new at this, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135297</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135297</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;They didn’t bail on conservatism, Duros; they wigged out on Palin and neo-con Republicans.&lt;/i&gt;

Ah. But now they&#039;re liberals?

Gotcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They didn’t bail on conservatism, Duros; they wigged out on Palin and neo-con Republicans.</i></p>
<p>Ah. But now they&#8217;re liberals?</p>
<p>Gotcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135293</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135293</guid>
		<description>Frank DiSalle: &lt;i&gt;If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my “Condi in ‘08″ bumper sticker&lt;/i&gt;

Would you like some salt with that, perhaps a bit of crow?

politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/01/18/pelosi-obama-disagree-on-tax-cuts-bush-investigations:/&lt;blockquote&gt;Pelosi, Obama disagree on tax cuts, Bush investigations
(CNN) — Two days before President-elect Barack Obama is officially sworn in, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made clear she disagrees with the incoming administration on at least two issues.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or are you going to back out by claiming the clock literally starts &lt;b&gt;now&lt;/b&gt; and something from earlier this month doesn&#039;t count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank DiSalle: <i>If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my “Condi in ‘08″ bumper sticker</i></p>
<p>Would you like some salt with that, perhaps a bit of crow?</p>
<p>politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/01/18/pelosi-obama-disagree-on-tax-cuts-bush-investigations:/<br />
<blockquote>Pelosi, Obama disagree on tax cuts, Bush investigations<br />
(CNN) — Two days before President-elect Barack Obama is officially sworn in, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made clear she disagrees with the incoming administration on at least two issues.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or are you going to back out by claiming the clock literally starts <b>now</b> and something from earlier this month doesn&#8217;t count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135292</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135292</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Seriously, Dennis, are you okay? You do realize that both Peggy and Kathleen were conservatives just a very short time ago, right? Perhaps before they realized what an epic fail conservatism was and how damaging it has been?&lt;/I&gt;--Duros62

They didn&#039;t bail on conservatism, Duros; they wigged out on Palin and neo-con Republicans.  Please check your sources before you lead with something like &#039;Seriously, are you okay&#039;, otherwise you just sound like some kid posting here who just recently got into politics because it was cool to hate George Bush.

Not that there&#039;s anyone here like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Seriously, Dennis, are you okay? You do realize that both Peggy and Kathleen were conservatives just a very short time ago, right? Perhaps before they realized what an epic fail conservatism was and how damaging it has been?</i>&#8211;Duros62</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t bail on conservatism, Duros; they wigged out on Palin and neo-con Republicans.  Please check your sources before you lead with something like &#8216;Seriously, are you okay&#8217;, otherwise you just sound like some kid posting here who just recently got into politics because it was cool to hate George Bush.</p>
<p>Not that there&#8217;s anyone here like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135281</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135281</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;He ain’t perfect. We’re not gonna agree with him 100%.&lt;/i&gt;

If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my &quot;Condi in &#039;08&quot; bumper sticker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He ain’t perfect. We’re not gonna agree with him 100%.</i></p>
<p>If any liberal disagrees with Obama between now and the end of the world, I will eat my &#8220;Condi in &#8216;08&#8243; bumper sticker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135280</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135280</guid>
		<description>Seriously, Dennis, are you okay? You do realize that both Peggy and Kathleen were conservatives just a very short time ago, right? Perhaps before they realized what an epic fail conservatism was and how damaging it has been?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, Dennis, are you okay? You do realize that both Peggy and Kathleen were conservatives just a very short time ago, right? Perhaps before they realized what an epic fail conservatism was and how damaging it has been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/29/another-thing/#comment-135279</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12673#comment-135279</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;left-wing hero Peggy Noonan

That just made my day.&lt;/i&gt;--Duros Hussein

And another New Friend of the Left tugs at Superman&#039;s cape.

&lt;a&gt;&lt;b&gt;Barack &quot;W&quot;. Obama&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
-- Kathleen Parker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>left-wing hero Peggy Noonan</p>
<p>That just made my day.</i>&#8211;Duros Hussein</p>
<p>And another New Friend of the Left tugs at Superman&#8217;s cape.</p>
<p><a><b>Barack &#8220;W&#8221;. Obama</b></a><br />
&#8211; Kathleen Parker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
