<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The proof of the pudding is in the eating&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kappa Man 1911</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-133024</link>
		<dc:creator>Kappa Man 1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-133024</guid>
		<description>Jay Tea
Jan 16th, 2009 at 11:11.....Porlock, interesting interpretation on Obama’s vetting crew. I guess they were so busy with Geithner that they missed Geithner’s illegal alien employee… the Bill Richardson investigation… or Eric Holder’s role in Clinton’s pardons… or Hillary Clinton doing big favors for Bill’s big donors…....

As I co-sign off my man Ta-Neshi Coates: WEAK SAUCE, Jay. WEAK, WEAK SAUCE. Please show us the proof of these supposed improprieties and I do know what the &quot;real deal&quot; is with your interpretations, so come at us with some real world reputable sources for your allegations and not the usual suspects you supply us with for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Tea<br />
Jan 16th, 2009 at 11:11&#8230;..Porlock, interesting interpretation on Obama’s vetting crew. I guess they were so busy with Geithner that they missed Geithner’s illegal alien employee… the Bill Richardson investigation… or Eric Holder’s role in Clinton’s pardons… or Hillary Clinton doing big favors for Bill’s big donors…&#8230;.</p>
<p>As I co-sign off my man Ta-Neshi Coates: WEAK SAUCE, Jay. WEAK, WEAK SAUCE. Please show us the proof of these supposed improprieties and I do know what the &#8220;real deal&#8221; is with your interpretations, so come at us with some real world reputable sources for your allegations and not the usual suspects you supply us with for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-133022</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-133022</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Stay classy, Republican’t Putsch fellator.&lt;/i&gt;

...and pussy coward chickenhawk. Bawk bawk bawk!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Stay classy, Republican’t Putsch fellator.</i></p>
<p>&#8230;and pussy coward chickenhawk. Bawk bawk bawk!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (: Tom :)</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-133017</link>
		<dc:creator>(: Tom :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-133017</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Jay Tea, Jan 16th, 2009 at 11:11 am&lt;/i&gt; 

&lt;i&gt;Not bad, Tom, but I think you missed a few talking points in there. Swing back by Democratic Underground for a refresher.&lt;/i&gt;

Way to duck the valid points I brought up by using yet another false equivalence between reality-based concerns and Republican&#039;t propaganda propagation.  Coming from someone who is a regular font of Republican&#039;t misinformation only adds to the ironic humor.  Don&#039;t worry, Jay - we&#039;re laughing &lt;b&gt;at&lt;/b&gt; you, not &lt;b&gt;with&lt;/B&gt; you.

And, thanks, Jay, for showing anyone not aware of the duplicity, hypocrisy, dishonesty, and maliciousness that is the heart and soul of the modern Republican&#039;t party.

Stay classy, Republican&#039;t &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Putsch&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; fellator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Jay Tea, Jan 16th, 2009 at 11:11 am</i> </p>
<p><i>Not bad, Tom, but I think you missed a few talking points in there. Swing back by Democratic Underground for a refresher.</i></p>
<p>Way to duck the valid points I brought up by using yet another false equivalence between reality-based concerns and Republican&#8217;t propaganda propagation.  Coming from someone who is a regular font of Republican&#8217;t misinformation only adds to the ironic humor.  Don&#8217;t worry, Jay &#8211; we&#8217;re laughing <b>at</b> you, not <b>with</b> you.</p>
<p>And, thanks, Jay, for showing anyone not aware of the duplicity, hypocrisy, dishonesty, and maliciousness that is the heart and soul of the modern Republican&#8217;t party.</p>
<p>Stay classy, Republican&#8217;t <b><i>Putsch</i></b> fellator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-133014</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-133014</guid>
		<description>J. G. Thayer: &quot;Not bad, Tom, but I think you missed a few talking points in there. Swing back by Democratic Underground for a refresher.&quot;

The hypocrisy you display is amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. G. Thayer: &#8220;Not bad, Tom, but I think you missed a few talking points in there. Swing back by Democratic Underground for a refresher.&#8221;</p>
<p>The hypocrisy you display is amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-133003</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-133003</guid>
		<description>And I want to point out, he got the saying right! God, I love having literate, intelligent people in charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I want to point out, he got the saying right! God, I love having literate, intelligent people in charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-133002</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-133002</guid>
		<description>Jay Tea: &lt;i&gt;Not bad, Tom, but I think you missed a few talking points in there. Swing back by Democratic Underground for a refresher.&lt;/i&gt;

The comedy stylings of Jay &quot;Ayers! Wright! Typhoid Barry! ACORN!&quot; Tea, ladies and gentlemen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Tea: <i>Not bad, Tom, but I think you missed a few talking points in there. Swing back by Democratic Underground for a refresher.</i></p>
<p>The comedy stylings of Jay &#8220;Ayers! Wright! Typhoid Barry! ACORN!&#8221; Tea, ladies and gentlemen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132997</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132997</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And by “cry,” I mean “laugh.”&lt;/i&gt;

And by &quot;your sense of humor makes me want to rip out my eyes&quot; I mean &quot;your sense of humor makes me want to rip out my eyes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And by “cry,” I mean “laugh.”</i></p>
<p>And by &#8220;your sense of humor makes me want to rip out my eyes&#8221; I mean &#8220;your sense of humor makes me want to rip out my eyes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132992</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132992</guid>
		<description>Not bad, Tom, but I think you missed a few talking points in there. Swing back by Democratic Underground for a refresher.

Now if you&#039;ll excuse me, I think I&#039;ll go have a good cry over being called part of a pack of &quot;lying weaselly hypocritical unamerican traitors Republican&#039;ts.&quot;

And by &quot;cry,&quot; I mean &quot;laugh.&quot;

Hope you feel better after getting that out of your system. Now run it past someone with a passing grasp of grammar and spelling for the next time you cut and paste your laughable vitriol.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad, Tom, but I think you missed a few talking points in there. Swing back by Democratic Underground for a refresher.</p>
<p>Now if you&#8217;ll excuse me, I think I&#8217;ll go have a good cry over being called part of a pack of &#8220;lying weaselly hypocritical unamerican traitors Republican&#8217;ts.&#8221;</p>
<p>And by &#8220;cry,&#8221; I mean &#8220;laugh.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hope you feel better after getting that out of your system. Now run it past someone with a passing grasp of grammar and spelling for the next time you cut and paste your laughable vitriol.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (: Tom :)</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132983</link>
		<dc:creator>(: Tom :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132983</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I waited until I could confirm that George Bush, Junior was an incompetent, mean spirited boob in way over his head and surrounded by Machiavellian shitheads. So pretty soon.&lt;/i&gt;

Me too.  But I could see that before he was installed (against the wishes if the american people) in 2000.

&lt;i&gt;Jay Tea, Jan 16th, 2009 at 8:42 am&lt;/i&gt; 

&lt;i&gt;Tom, how long after 2000 or 2004 did YOU wait before going after Bush? After all, YOU lost those elections.&lt;/i&gt;

Probably significantly longer than you and your ilk waited until going after Clinton.  And most definitely longer than you and yours went after Gore and Kerry.  Also, there is a slight difference between going after someone for partisan political reasons (with little to no truth to them), such as the Republican&#039;ts have, and going after a lying, cokeheaded deserter who went AWOL from his cushy National Guard &quot;service&quot; during wartime (just to mention one actual factual reason for going after him before he stole his first federal election in 2000).  But go ahead and try to set up the false equivalence anyhow, Jay.  Just another data point to show how much of a pack of lying weaselly hypocritical unamerican traitors Republican&#039;ts like you, Jay, are to the studio audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I waited until I could confirm that George Bush, Junior was an incompetent, mean spirited boob in way over his head and surrounded by Machiavellian shitheads. So pretty soon.</i></p>
<p>Me too.  But I could see that before he was installed (against the wishes if the american people) in 2000.</p>
<p><i>Jay Tea, Jan 16th, 2009 at 8:42 am</i> </p>
<p><i>Tom, how long after 2000 or 2004 did YOU wait before going after Bush? After all, YOU lost those elections.</i></p>
<p>Probably significantly longer than you and your ilk waited until going after Clinton.  And most definitely longer than you and yours went after Gore and Kerry.  Also, there is a slight difference between going after someone for partisan political reasons (with little to no truth to them), such as the Republican&#8217;ts have, and going after a lying, cokeheaded deserter who went AWOL from his cushy National Guard &#8220;service&#8221; during wartime (just to mention one actual factual reason for going after him before he stole his first federal election in 2000).  But go ahead and try to set up the false equivalence anyhow, Jay.  Just another data point to show how much of a pack of lying weaselly hypocritical unamerican traitors Republican&#8217;ts like you, Jay, are to the studio audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132975</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132975</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Tom, how long after 2000 or 2004 did YOU wait before going after Bush? After all, YOU lost those elections.&lt;/i&gt;

I waited until I could confirm that George Bush, Junior was an incompetent, mean spirited boob in way over his head and surrounded by Machiavellian shitheads. So pretty soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Tom, how long after 2000 or 2004 did YOU wait before going after Bush? After all, YOU lost those elections.</i></p>
<p>I waited until I could confirm that George Bush, Junior was an incompetent, mean spirited boob in way over his head and surrounded by Machiavellian shitheads. So pretty soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132971</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132971</guid>
		<description>Tom, how long after 2000 or 2004 did YOU wait before going after Bush? After all, YOU lost those elections.

This is just an embodiment of the principle we&#039;ve had beaten over our heads for the past eight years: &quot;dissent is the highest form of patriotism.&quot;

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, how long after 2000 or 2004 did YOU wait before going after Bush? After all, YOU lost those elections.</p>
<p>This is just an embodiment of the principle we&#8217;ve had beaten over our heads for the past eight years: &#8220;dissent is the highest form of patriotism.&#8221;</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132969</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132969</guid>
		<description>Porlock, interesting interpretation on Obama&#039;s vetting crew. I guess they were so busy with Geithner that they missed Geithner&#039;s illegal alien employee... the Bill Richardson investigation... or Eric Holder&#039;s role in Clinton&#039;s pardons... or Hillary Clinton doing big favors for Bill&#039;s big donors... 

I guess that tax situation was really that complex, if it monopolized their attention that much.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Porlock, interesting interpretation on Obama&#8217;s vetting crew. I guess they were so busy with Geithner that they missed Geithner&#8217;s illegal alien employee&#8230; the Bill Richardson investigation&#8230; or Eric Holder&#8217;s role in Clinton&#8217;s pardons&#8230; or Hillary Clinton doing big favors for Bill&#8217;s big donors&#8230; </p>
<p>I guess that tax situation was really that complex, if it monopolized their attention that much.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porlock Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132948</link>
		<dc:creator>Porlock Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132948</guid>
		<description>Geithner is such an effective red herring, isn&#039;t he? I know he&#039;ll be a favorite. After all, consider the facts:

Th IRS found that he&#039;d omitted to pay self-employment tax. This is a mistake that he and &lt;i&gt;his professional tax preparer&lt;/i&gt; should not have made. He paid the back taxes promptly.

The reason he owed self-employment taxes was, of course, that he was &lt;i&gt;not self-employed&lt;/i&gt; but worked for an international organization that ran under one of those weird tax-law self-contradictions that the Right loves to complain about since after all it has to get something right once in a while. The IRS saw this failure as something so dangerous and malicious that it charged him &lt;i&gt;no penalties&lt;/i&gt;. You try missing something you should have paid and not getting hit with a penalty.

And that was the end of it, almost. The enforcers didn&#039;t notice anything else wrong until the case was examined by somebody really sharp: &lt;i&gt;Obama&#039;s vetting crew&lt;/i&gt;. Good luck catching this bunch out with some Palin-esque surprise.

So, when they pointed this one out, he paid up promptly.

Yes, he is utterly unqualified to serve in high office in a Republican administration: he admits mistakes and corrects them.

(Not to say there are no valid grounds for doubt about Geithner. But trust the Republicans not to get involved with those.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geithner is such an effective red herring, isn&#8217;t he? I know he&#8217;ll be a favorite. After all, consider the facts:</p>
<p>Th IRS found that he&#8217;d omitted to pay self-employment tax. This is a mistake that he and <i>his professional tax preparer</i> should not have made. He paid the back taxes promptly.</p>
<p>The reason he owed self-employment taxes was, of course, that he was <i>not self-employed</i> but worked for an international organization that ran under one of those weird tax-law self-contradictions that the Right loves to complain about since after all it has to get something right once in a while. The IRS saw this failure as something so dangerous and malicious that it charged him <i>no penalties</i>. You try missing something you should have paid and not getting hit with a penalty.</p>
<p>And that was the end of it, almost. The enforcers didn&#8217;t notice anything else wrong until the case was examined by somebody really sharp: <i>Obama&#8217;s vetting crew</i>. Good luck catching this bunch out with some Palin-esque surprise.</p>
<p>So, when they pointed this one out, he paid up promptly.</p>
<p>Yes, he is utterly unqualified to serve in high office in a Republican administration: he admits mistakes and corrects them.</p>
<p>(Not to say there are no valid grounds for doubt about Geithner. But trust the Republicans not to get involved with those.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132932</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132932</guid>
		<description>CSS: &lt;i&gt;If they don’t change, they will never win another nation election again. The demographics have turned against them to the point where they can’t win as they currently are.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, sure.  They can&#039;t win as they are and indeed they didn&#039;t.

But things don&#039;t ever stay as they are.  The pendulum swings.  Things get better and folks get complacent.  Thinking things are &quot;permanent&quot; speeds the approach of a tipping point of complacency.

And then the Repugs find something to scare people with and the Dems remember they don&#039;t have a spine so don&#039;t fight back.  Best we can hope for is that it takes as long as possible to get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSS: <i>If they don’t change, they will never win another nation election again. The demographics have turned against them to the point where they can’t win as they currently are.</i></p>
<p>Well, sure.  They can&#8217;t win as they are and indeed they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But things don&#8217;t ever stay as they are.  The pendulum swings.  Things get better and folks get complacent.  Thinking things are &#8220;permanent&#8221; speeds the approach of a tipping point of complacency.</p>
<p>And then the Repugs find something to scare people with and the Dems remember they don&#8217;t have a spine so don&#8217;t fight back.  Best we can hope for is that it takes as long as possible to get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrGreyGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132922</link>
		<dc:creator>MrGreyGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132922</guid>
		<description>Nice speech by the VP-elect, just wonder if he made it up himself. Either way, it&#039;ll be fun to see how the Obama-media deals with the Gaffe-master for the next 4 years, cause you just know &#039;ol Joe&#039;s gonna give the Right plenty to play with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice speech by the VP-elect, just wonder if he made it up himself. Either way, it&#8217;ll be fun to see how the Obama-media deals with the Gaffe-master for the next 4 years, cause you just know &#8216;ol Joe&#8217;s gonna give the Right plenty to play with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (: Tom :)</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132920</link>
		<dc:creator>(: Tom :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132920</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;SaveFarris, Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:49 am&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;“He said he would bring more to the job than any of his predecessors, except possibly Lyndon B. Johnson.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Wonder if he’ll get as much flack for this as Hillary did for her unfortunate remarks.&lt;/i&gt;

Wonder if Cheney will &lt;b&gt;ever&lt;/b&gt; get as much flack for anything he&#039;s said or done over the last eight years.

Wonder if &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Putsch&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; will &lt;b&gt;ever&lt;/b&gt; get as much flack for anything he&#039;s said or done over the last eight years.

Wonder if Senator Intertubes will &lt;b&gt;ever&lt;/b&gt; get as much flack for anything he&#039;s said or done over the last eight years.

Wonder if the conservative media and the Rabid Republican&#039;t talk radio gang will &lt;b&gt;ever&lt;/b&gt; get as much flack for anything they&#039;ve said or done over the last eight years.

&lt;i&gt;william, Jan 15th, 2009 at 2:21 pm&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;“Did either of those other guys have 28 years in Congress before they became VP?”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;i&gt;As if 28 years in congress doing nothing but sucking off the government teat is a qualification&lt;/i&gt;

Maybe you can ask Senator Intertubes about that one.  Or Cunningham or Abramoff or the rest of the cast of thousands of Republican&#039;ts that have been raping the treasury for the past eight years.  Funny how they can lose billions in Iraq, trillions of government money &quot;floating loans&quot; to their banker friends, and no one can even ask them about it.  But, the $350 billion that Obama might get a chance to oversee and audit - well, hey, we have to audit that six ways to Sunday &lt;b&gt;before the man&#039;s even president&lt;/b&gt;!  Nice set of hypocritical standards (or lack thereof) you gots there...

One can hope for a restoration of the rule of law and/or even slightly trying to get to the truth of the Republican&#039;t cabals crimes during that time.  One would probably be foolish to expect anything approaching justice when, even now, tired old ditto monkey gibberish and the same old deflect and smear is still all the Republican&#039;ts got.

Until then: elections count.  &lt;b&gt;You&lt;/b&gt; lost.  Get over it and stop trying to throw even more monkey wrenches into the process now that many of the sheeple have finally noticed how badly you&#039;ve Cheneyed things up.

You sound like the fools who want to fight in a burning house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>SaveFarris, Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:49 am</i></p>
<blockquote><p>“He said he would bring more to the job than any of his predecessors, except possibly Lyndon B. Johnson.”</p></blockquote>
<p><i>Wonder if he’ll get as much flack for this as Hillary did for her unfortunate remarks.</i></p>
<p>Wonder if Cheney will <b>ever</b> get as much flack for anything he&#8217;s said or done over the last eight years.</p>
<p>Wonder if <b><i>Putsch</i></b> will <b>ever</b> get as much flack for anything he&#8217;s said or done over the last eight years.</p>
<p>Wonder if Senator Intertubes will <b>ever</b> get as much flack for anything he&#8217;s said or done over the last eight years.</p>
<p>Wonder if the conservative media and the Rabid Republican&#8217;t talk radio gang will <b>ever</b> get as much flack for anything they&#8217;ve said or done over the last eight years.</p>
<p><i>william, Jan 15th, 2009 at 2:21 pm</i></p>
<blockquote><p>“Did either of those other guys have 28 years in Congress before they became VP?”</p></blockquote>
<p><i>As if 28 years in congress doing nothing but sucking off the government teat is a qualification</i></p>
<p>Maybe you can ask Senator Intertubes about that one.  Or Cunningham or Abramoff or the rest of the cast of thousands of Republican&#8217;ts that have been raping the treasury for the past eight years.  Funny how they can lose billions in Iraq, trillions of government money &#8220;floating loans&#8221; to their banker friends, and no one can even ask them about it.  But, the $350 billion that Obama might get a chance to oversee and audit &#8211; well, hey, we have to audit that six ways to Sunday <b>before the man&#8217;s even president</b>!  Nice set of hypocritical standards (or lack thereof) you gots there&#8230;</p>
<p>One can hope for a restoration of the rule of law and/or even slightly trying to get to the truth of the Republican&#8217;t cabals crimes during that time.  One would probably be foolish to expect anything approaching justice when, even now, tired old ditto monkey gibberish and the same old deflect and smear is still all the Republican&#8217;ts got.</p>
<p>Until then: elections count.  <b>You</b> lost.  Get over it and stop trying to throw even more monkey wrenches into the process now that many of the sheeple have finally noticed how badly you&#8217;ve Cheneyed things up.</p>
<p>You sound like the fools who want to fight in a burning house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132918</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132918</guid>
		<description>css: &quot;Welcome to permanent minority status.&quot;

Sean D. Martin: &quot;I suspect that’s got exactly as much chance as coming true as a &#039;permanent Republican majority&#039;.&quot;

If they don&#039;t change, they will never win another nation election again. The demographics have turned against them to the point where they can&#039;t win as they currently are. 

If I recall correctly, the turning point state in 2008 was Virginia and the Democrats won Virginia by 8 points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>css: &#8220;Welcome to permanent minority status.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sean D. Martin: &#8220;I suspect that’s got exactly as much chance as coming true as a &#8216;permanent Republican majority&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t change, they will never win another nation election again. The demographics have turned against them to the point where they can&#8217;t win as they currently are. </p>
<p>If I recall correctly, the turning point state in 2008 was Virginia and the Democrats won Virginia by 8 points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132917</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132917</guid>
		<description>The &quot;farking idiot and racist&quot; is &quot;restoring honor and dignity to the Office Of The Vice President&quot;?

Confusing, to say the least.


Almost as confusing as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/10/16/joe-the-plumber-and-taxes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Joe the Plumber&quot; and Taxes&lt;/a&gt; being a big issue, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/opinion/15thu1.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Timothy Geithner the nominee for Treasury Secretary and Taxes&lt;/a&gt;... not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;farking idiot and racist&#8221; is &#8220;restoring honor and dignity to the Office Of The Vice President&#8221;?</p>
<p>Confusing, to say the least.</p>
<p>Almost as confusing as <a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/10/16/joe-the-plumber-and-taxes/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Joe the Plumber&#8221; and Taxes</a> being a big issue, but <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/opinion/15thu1.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">Timothy Geithner the nominee for Treasury Secretary and Taxes</a>&#8230; not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132909</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132909</guid>
		<description>css: &lt;I&gt;Welcome to permanent minority status.&lt;/I&gt;

I suspect that&#039;s got exactly as much chance as coming true as a &quot;permanent Republican majority&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>css: <i>Welcome to permanent minority status.</i></p>
<p>I suspect that&#8217;s got exactly as much chance as coming true as a &#8220;permanent Republican majority&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/the-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating/#comment-132906</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12382#comment-132906</guid>
		<description>James H: &quot;Did anybody else imagine Joe Biden as the Tick carrying on about pudding?&quot;

Now that you bring it up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James H: &#8220;Did anybody else imagine Joe Biden as the Tick carrying on about pudding?&#8221;</p>
<p>Now that you bring it up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

