Comments on: Obama/Biden Vs. The Supremes http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: daniel rotter http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-133053 daniel rotter Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:45 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-133053 What about Scalia, Kennedy, and Breyer? Where were they? What about Scalia, Kennedy, and Breyer? Where were they?

]]> By: Jaim http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-133039 Jaim Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:02:47 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-133039 Yeah, Alito went and pooped his diapers. Republicans have a hard time acting like adults. Yeah, Alito went and pooped his diapers. Republicans have a hard time acting like adults.

]]> By: Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132949 Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:24:31 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132949 Don't forget to mention what a prick Alito is. He skipped the meeting even though he was in the building. Don’t forget to mention what a prick Alito is. He skipped the meeting even though he was in the building.

]]> By: daniel rotter http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132944 daniel rotter Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:46:35 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132944 Were the other four Justices not present, or were they just out of the camera's frame? Were the other four Justices not present, or were they just out of the camera’s frame?

]]> By: Jaim http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132921 Jaim Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:24:59 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132921 My sister was on the fence about who to vote for in November (I know, I know). I didn't really debate with her or anything, but I suggested that even if she wasn't sure Obama had enough experience, you could damn well bet that the next few picks for the SCOTUS regarding womens' rights would be critical. I'd like to think this is why she made the sane decision and voted Obama. My sister was on the fence about who to vote for in November (I know, I know). I didn’t really debate with her or anything, but I suggested that even if she wasn’t sure Obama had enough experience, you could damn well bet that the next few picks for the SCOTUS regarding womens’ rights would be critical.

I’d like to think this is why she made the sane decision and voted Obama.

]]> By: Oliver Willis http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132916 Oliver Willis Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:45:36 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132916 <em>Is that in the rule book?</em> Section 1, Paragaph 35. Previously known informally as The MLK Rule, now known as the Obama Mandate. Is that in the rule book?
Section 1, Paragaph 35. Previously known informally as The MLK Rule, now known as the Obama Mandate.

]]> By: NCSenior http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132915 NCSenior Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:25:30 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132915 Most importantly it is great to know that new appointees will be made by an intelligent and responsible president. Most importantly it is great to know that new appointees will be made by an intelligent and responsible president.

]]> By: Duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132900 Duros62 Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:36:05 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132900 He's just standing back there because nobody likes him. And he's surrounded by liberals. He’s just standing back there because nobody likes him.

And he’s surrounded by liberals.

]]> By: Parthenon http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132891 Parthenon Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:48:07 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132891 We're probably reading a little too much into where Justice Thomas ended up standing for a single photograph. We’re probably reading a little too much into where Justice Thomas ended up standing for a single photograph.

]]> By: Sean D. Martin http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132888 Sean D. Martin Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:41:44 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132888 Not yet, but it's going to be voted on at <a>the next meeting.</a> Not yet, but it’s going to be voted on at the next meeting.

]]> By: Chris Russell http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132885 Chris Russell Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:34:07 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132885 Stevens has that "THANK GOD, I can finally retire" look in his eye. Stevens has that “THANK GOD, I can finally retire” look in his eye.

]]> By: Duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132860 Duros62 Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:33:37 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132860 Is that in the rule book? Is that in the rule book?

]]> By: Oliver Willis http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132859 Oliver Willis Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:32:40 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132859 <em>And it’s interesting how Thomas has stood as far back as possible in the picture.</em> Only one head negro in charge at a time. Yeah, I went there. And it’s interesting how Thomas has stood as far back as possible in the picture.

Only one head negro in charge at a time.

Yeah, I went there.

]]> By: Duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132850 Duros62 Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:03:38 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132850 "Stop!....In the name of love...!" Oh. Wrong supremes. “Stop!….In the name of love…!”

Oh. Wrong supremes.

]]> By: Mithras http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132841 Mithras Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:21:35 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132841 She's a very quiet and unassuming person, actually. Doesn't Souter look really uncomfortable? And it's interesting how Thomas has stood as far back as possible in the picture. And, of course, how relaxed Obama is. She’s a very quiet and unassuming person, actually.

Doesn’t Souter look really uncomfortable? And it’s interesting how Thomas has stood as far back as possible in the picture. And, of course, how relaxed Obama is.

]]> By: jon http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/15/obamabiden-vs-the-supremes/#comment-132824 jon Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:13:05 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=12378#comment-132824 I always pictured her as more of the "That's how I roll, motherfucker" type myself. I always pictured her as more of the “That’s how I roll, motherfucker” type myself.

]]>