Although, I admit, those left-handed motherfuckers can’t be trusted.

Hey, watch it pal. I’m left-handed. So is the new President. So is John McCain.

The local PD says they’ve never had any issues w/ the family and none of their neighbors say that there are any issues. Heck, the only hint of anything is from the wife making a comment in a conversation w/ a neighbor about how she and her husband had an argument about something. There is no evidence that these parents are anything other than poor racists living on welfare but still managing to love and care for their children. Is that really a class of parent the state has an interest in taking kids from? More importantly, is that a class of parent that Democrats should be supporting the taking of?

“Yeah, I have a feeling it’s more than that they have stupid names. And stupider parents.”

It’ll be some argument that, because their parents are ignorant fucks, the DYFS needed to step in, take the kids, and intervene in the family. They’ll trot out some psychologist who will make the brilliant observation that the beliefs of parents can have an effect on their children. The parents will be strong-armed into doing whatever the family court says because they don’t have the means to hire a lawyer good enough to defend themselves.

Well, for a girl.

In Quebec it can be considered child abuse and the government can veto your choice. ‘Latrine’ is the example that sticks out the most in my mind.

I develop newborn pictures for the local hospital’s nursery.
Stupid baby names isn’t technically child abuse, nut it’s pretty close.

Except there is no evidence that’s the case. Dyfs isn’t allowed to talk about individual families, as you could understand.

From the article:
Harris said family services did not tell police the reason the children were removed. Agency spokeswoman Kate Bernyk said it does not comment on specific cases.

It’s a government agency taking children from their parents on the basis of the parents’ political orientation. There have been no allegations of wrong-doing, abuse, or maltreatment of the children, and yet NJ’s Division of Youth and Family Services was allowed to take three children from their parents. So these kids have ignorant fucks for parents. So what?

You wouldn’t see any wimpy, soft on terror, doves Democrats like me making that point.

I realize that it’s sterotypical to assume that a Democrat is for even more government control of our lives, but Dkelsmoth, are you incapable of seeing any way which this precedent could come back and bite members of a protected group you support? No way at all? Are you really sure that you want “ignorant fuck” to be a justification for the taking of children? I don’t know if you’re a parent, but if you are I sure hope you never, ever say or do anything stupid ever. And if you do, don’t do it in Jersey.

Jay,

I agree with you, to assume that these people have anything to do with a normal Republican, or a normal Democrat, is pretty extreme. However, I would have to say that when you look at hotair.com’s take on this, the comment section is unbelievable.

LINK

The fact that someone can say they understand the “basis” of their argument and saying that the kids should not have been taken. Unbelievable. You wouldn’t see any wimpy, soft on terror, doves Democrats like me making that point.

This freak is a Scot from Jersey? well, there’s your problem right there.

That’s the Big Lie that certain wingnuttian
eminences have been peddling for some time
now. It’s always reminded me of the graffito
I saw at university years ago;
HITLER WAS RIGHT
and underneath, in smaller letters
WELL, HE SURE AS HELL WASN’T LEFT

It is likely that these people of unknown political leanings don’t care for all them “Welfare Queens” or “mold spores,” if you know what I mean (heh-heh). Or the “mixed ethnicity” of the U.S. They prob’ly prefer “Small Town Values” (and not “San Francisco Values”) and “States’ Rights.” But yeah, it’s the height of douchebaggery (way worse than anything The Schloz or these jokers did) to speculate as to their political leanings. You’d never hear Rush do something like that.

Southern. Strategy.

Until you change that, your party isn’t allowed to complain about being called racists.

However, I find it EXTREMELY unlikely that they voted for Obama, or for any Democrat.