The left indulged in charactor assassination and didn’t come close to applying a consistant intellectually honest evenhanded standard to Sarah Palin. While that is normal for liberals the degree of malice was unusually high.

Funny thing, though, AO – when the right indulged in charactor assassination and didn’t come close to applying a consistant intellectually honest evenhanded standard to Barack Obama, you said absolutely nothing about it (unless it was to whinge about how the conservatove media wasn’t piling on to Obama enough). While that is normal for Reich wing Republican’ts, the degree of malice was unusually high.

Absolutely amazing that you fail to see this sort of thing. Then again, the number of things you fail to see (in your own hypocritical comments here at the very least) suggests a level of fail that is high even for a bedwetting chickenhawk with Republican’t blinder on such as yourself.

What did I say about style points? Give ed another cookie! Haw!

There is a large section of Republicans, and indeed members of the media, who think that no matter what the score is, if you don’t declare the game a tie, you are biased.

What a steaming pile of sanctimonious and spectacularly clueless claptrap bullshit.

Sarah Palin got an “intellectually honest evenhanded” treatment from the “liberal” media. Then Palin opened her mouth.

It was not the liberal media who compelled Palin to say that only certain parts of the country have “real” Americans, that foreign policy experience is measured by geographic proximity to other countries, that abortion clinic bombers do not qualify as terrorists or portray herself as the everyday worker while parading in an extravagant wardrobe bought with the money of others. There was only so much disbelief that could be suspended until those with brains slightly bigger than a shrew could realize that Sarah Palin wasn’t remotely qualified for the vice president position.
Those who suggest otherwise are just as stupid enough to paint themselves into a corner and are now reduced to lecturing the brush.

Which honestly would be a crying shame. The less Obama has to spend/campaign, the more time he can spend being a good president.

And even higher of Lisa Murkowski, at least in terms of a possible Senate race:

Alaska 2010 Senate
Republican Primary: Murkowski (R-i) 57, Palin (R) 33

The left indulged in charactor assassination and didn’t come close to applying a consistant intellectually honest evenhanded standard to Sarah Palin. While that is normal for liberals the degree of malice was unusually high.

The people in her home state who know her best think quite highly of her.

True, but you made up for the low degree of difficulty with bodacious style points.

Thanks for the love, but dealing with Palin-philes ain’t exactly a tall order.

In what respect, Amused Observer?

Now, what I want to KNOW why when you post something about Sarah, her defenders SAY THAT YOU ARE AFRAID OF HER? We are laughing, does this laughter somehow denote FEAR? Do they perceive it AS nervous LAUGHTER, INSTEAD OF ROLLING IN THE AISLES OVER THE LATEST PALIN GAFFE laughter??? Don´t get it…………

Although, to acknowledge reality, she is a fuckin idiot–George Bush, Junior stupid. Occam’s Razor and all…

Oh, that mean ol’ Katie Couric, asking a politician what newspapers she regularly reads! The horror! The humanity!

But Palin is definitely comedy gold.