Uh, the guy’s gonna be the next vice-president.

Uh, no. I didn’t bring it up. You did. And you got it entirely wrong.

Uh, no. I didn’t bring it up. <a href=”http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/01/07/conservatives-why/#comment-132053″You did. And you got it entirely wrong.

So again I ask you 3 years down the road, How is that disarming Hezbollah thing going?

And you accuse me of ignoring the “meat” of a post? You brought up Biden’s comments as if he was imagining something that never happened. Now you want to argue about how the thing that “didn’t happen” turned out.

Tell you what. You can educate us all on how it turned out–go nuts! By doing so, you’ll at least admit that Biden wasn’t making the whole thing up.

Now Quaker you have a habit of never actually addressing the meat of a post but always dancing away. Now in your vindication of Biden’s little mistake you bring up the the glory of the involvement of France with getting Syria to diminish her presense in Lebanon.

“That means focusing on the part of the United Nations Security Council resolution on Lebanon that demands Syria’s withdrawal, and holding off for a short time on the part that calls for Hezbollah to disarm”

Syria withdrew but her proxy remained. So again I ask you 3 years down the road, How is that disarming Hezbollah thing going?

Does this mean you’re ready to admit that Biden wasn’t making stuff up?

“That means focusing on the part of the United Nations Security Council resolution on Lebanon that demands Syria’s withdrawal, and holding off for a short time on the part that calls for Hezbollah to disarm.”

We’re 3 years or more down the road, how is that disarming Hezbollah thing going?

In 2005.

the world’s response to the Lebanese crisis, the right course for now is to separate two problems. That means focusing on the part of the United Nations Security Council resolution on Lebanon that demands Syria’s withdrawal, and holding off for a short time on the part that calls for Hezbollah to disarm. The Bush administration has wisely, albeit reluctantly, agreed to go along with France and the United Nations on this course. This weakens Hezbollah’s anti-American demagoguery and makes supporting Syria’s presence harder.

Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, will portray any weakening of Western pressure as a victory, and for that reason France and the United Nations must make it clear that Hezbollah will eventually have to disarm. It remains a long shot, but exchanging his banner for Lebanon’s flag suggests that Sheik Nasrallah is not above changing his stripes if it is politically expedient.

Really, you ought to read more.

Biden was, as is his wont, simply making shit up that sounded good. It was another example of the “The Three B’s of Joe Biden” — when challenged, Bluster, Bully, and Bullshit.

J.

So why pretend he was talking about moon people? He conflated Syrian forces with Hezbollah. It’s not like there’s no connection.

Indeed the entire point was Biden got his facts wrong in the VP debates, and Fafaroo was dead wrong for insinuating that Biden got it right and that Jay was wrong for pointing out Bidens blunder.

Syrian security? Cedar Revolution? Hot Lebanese babes with paint on their faces? Any of this sounding familiar?

Yeah, yeah, I know, Biden balled up Hezbollah with the Syrian military in Lebanon and that was wrong. But let’s not pretend he was talking about purple seagulls from Mars or something.

““During his debate with Sarah Palin, he impressed everyone with his command of the facts — until folks had time to actually check those ‘facts.’”

Are you kidding? Cuz if you’re kidding, well, I take it back. Conservatives are freaking hilarious.

Jay Tea, how often have you proven dead fucking wrong on basic, easily verified facts”

Tell us all about Joe biden , Hezbollah and France. And stay away from those barnyard animals.

So Fafaroo, might you give us a time and place when France and the United States kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon. That is what the arrogent blowhard that Parthenon calls competent claimed in the Vice Presidential debates.

Strangely enough that absolute fabrication never caught the attention of the media. You remember, the media with no bias.

I might point out Fafaroo you have an unhealthy interest in beastiality, perhaps counciling or therapy?

Um, the point you made quite explicitly was that it’s okay to lie about someone if that person has at anytime in their life, lied about themselves. Not only does this make no ethical sense, it makes no sense period.

If I once told someone I was captain of the football team in high school when I wasn’t, would that person, or someone else, then have the perfect right to make up a story about me beating my wife? I don’t think so.

That’s all there is to it… to a degree, this is the free market at work: Jay Tea and other right-wingers WANT to hear stories like this and will reward right-wingers who tell them, creating a market for radio-liars to do so. It’s all about making people like Jay Tea feel better about their impotence and public repudiation of their gutter ideology. If it this dishonest story, Jay Tea, makes you feel better about yourself in the face of the public failure of Republican policies, then go to it. Keep it up. Remain part of the disgusting group of dishonest losers that this radio idiot represents.

No, you didn’t “round it off”. You were careless. You thought you knew and you didn’t bother to check. Time after time you’re careless with even elementary facts.

Biden has made verbal gaffes and mistakes through his career, sure. Biden would still have to do something so incredibly ridiculous as Quayle’s tiny skirmish with Murphy Brown before I will believe that Quayle looks good next to Biden.

Impossible. Conservatives don’t do humor.

Well, they don’t do it well. See Fox’s answer to the Daily Show. Or don’t, if you still want to be sentient aferwards.