Why Was The Cincinnati Zoo Even Thinking Of Working With Creationists?
Tweet
From the department of things that never made any sense.
4 Responses to “Why Was The Cincinnati Zoo Even Thinking Of Working With Creationists?”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Unfortunately, I have to claim Cincinnati as my hometown. Now I live in that mecca for heathens, Chicago…and I love it!!!
It is no surprise that the Cincinnati Zoo would have at one time entered into some kind of arrangement with the Creation Museum. It is, after all, located in the Southern most (in its attitudes) of the Northern cities.
You’re referring to a city that didn’t just leave some 19th century draconian city charter on the books allowing the termination of employees based on sexual orientation. They INSTITUTED it in the early 90s and only repealed it in 2006.
Don’t get me wrong. There are some good, progressive people in Cincinnati (Hamilton County did vote blue this election). But, for the most part, it’s extremely socially conservative.
Joe:
I was going to ask that. To me, Cincinnati always has had the reputation of being pretty conservative for a “big” city. So OW’s story doesn’t surprise me one bit.
Yeah but even though the city is southernish, the people who work at the zoo should know science at least.
From what I read, apparently the Zoo thought of it in the same way other organizations think of cross-promotions with other entities: as a way to promote tourism. Somehow it didn’t occur to them to realize that the Creation Museum was a joke unworthy of being branded with the Zoo. For all of the pretense, the Creation Museum is a religious entity, not a scientific one, and the Zoo is of course, totally scientific. I wonder what they were thinking: that those who went to the Creation Museum would buy the evolutionary science of the zoo.