<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elections Have Consequences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:37:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126818</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126818</guid>
		<description>&quot;Given your track record, I’d take that bet.&quot;

You would lose that bet, because one of Jay Tea&#039;s biggest weaknesses is figuring out when he is wrong. No matter what happens, he would think he&#039;s won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Given your track record, I’d take that bet.&#8221;</p>
<p>You would lose that bet, because one of Jay Tea&#8217;s biggest weaknesses is figuring out when he is wrong. No matter what happens, he would think he&#8217;s won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros 62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126751</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros 62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126751</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And for me, it’s a win-win: either I’m proven right, or the country benefits.&lt;/i&gt;

Given your track record, I&#039;d take that bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And for me, it’s a win-win: either I’m proven right, or the country benefits.</i></p>
<p>Given your track record, I&#8217;d take that bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126737</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126737</guid>
		<description>&quot;Someone wake me when Strowbridge says something that doesn’t involve some variant of &#039;shut the fuck up.&#039; I think his needle’s stuck.&quot;

I&#039;ll stop telling you to shut the fuck up when you stop saying things that are stupid. 

This is your fault. You are the moron here. If you were learn, I wouldn&#039;t have to keep telling you to shut the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Someone wake me when Strowbridge says something that doesn’t involve some variant of &#8217;shut the fuck up.&#8217; I think his needle’s stuck.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll stop telling you to shut the fuck up when you stop saying things that are stupid. </p>
<p>This is your fault. You are the moron here. If you were learn, I wouldn&#8217;t have to keep telling you to shut the fuck up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126718</link>
		<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126718</guid>
		<description>Jay Tea,

You said, &lt;i&gt;We’ll have to wait and see, midder… but filibustering doesn’t mean that the filibusterers (man, what an awkward word) take any responsibility. Look at the Democrats who killed the aforementioned Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac reforms earlier in this decade…&lt;/i&gt;

I made the mistake of thinking that two sentences, one right after the other in the same paragraph, had some relevance to each other. Sorry to assume that about your writing.

Contemporaneous evidence of Democrats threatening to filibuster the FM regulation bill, please. Democrats just saying that they didn&#039;t like the bill =/= filibuster threat. Cf. Democratic action on Bush nominations for appellate judges, where I can find you plenty of newspaper articles where they were, in fact, articulating a threat of filibuster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Tea,</p>
<p>You said, <i>We’ll have to wait and see, midder… but filibustering doesn’t mean that the filibusterers (man, what an awkward word) take any responsibility. Look at the Democrats who killed the aforementioned Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac reforms earlier in this decade…</i></p>
<p>I made the mistake of thinking that two sentences, one right after the other in the same paragraph, had some relevance to each other. Sorry to assume that about your writing.</p>
<p>Contemporaneous evidence of Democrats threatening to filibuster the FM regulation bill, please. Democrats just saying that they didn&#8217;t like the bill =/= filibuster threat. Cf. Democratic action on Bush nominations for appellate judges, where I can find you plenty of newspaper articles where they were, in fact, articulating a threat of filibuster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126687</guid>
		<description>Someone wake me when Strowbridge says something that doesn&#039;t involve some variant of &quot;shut the fuck up.&quot; I think his needle&#039;s stuck.

(Damn, I&#039;m dating myself there...)

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone wake me when Strowbridge says something that doesn&#8217;t involve some variant of &#8220;shut the fuck up.&#8221; I think his needle&#8217;s stuck.</p>
<p>(Damn, I&#8217;m dating myself there&#8230;)</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126685</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126685</guid>
		<description>&quot;You can find plenty of examples of me saying that dissenters are wrong-headed and stupid and inviting disaster...&quot;

And you&#039;ve been wrong, so shut the fuck up. 

&quot;For eight years, I’ve heard that &#039;dissent is the highest form of patriotism.&#039; Guess that’s all gone, with the new &#039;Hope and Change&#039; agenda…&quot;

There&#039;s dissent, and then there&#039;s stupidity. Your bleatings fall under the latter category. If you have something intelligent to say, say it. Otherwise shut the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can find plenty of examples of me saying that dissenters are wrong-headed and stupid and inviting disaster&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>And you&#8217;ve been wrong, so shut the fuck up. </p>
<p>&#8220;For eight years, I’ve heard that &#8216;dissent is the highest form of patriotism.&#8217; Guess that’s all gone, with the new &#8216;Hope and Change&#8217; agenda…&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s dissent, and then there&#8217;s stupidity. Your bleatings fall under the latter category. If you have something intelligent to say, say it. Otherwise shut the fuck up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126683</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126683</guid>
		<description>PG, did I say &quot;filibuster?&quot; The Democrats made it clear that they were united in opposing the bill, and that meant that the bill would fall short of the 60 votes it needed to survive a filibuster threat.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PG, did I say &#8220;filibuster?&#8221; The Democrats made it clear that they were united in opposing the bill, and that meant that the bill would fall short of the 60 votes it needed to survive a filibuster threat.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126675</link>
		<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126675</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In both cases the Democrats united in lockstep to oppose the bill unanimously&lt;/i&gt;

Jay Tea, again, do you have any contemporaneous documentation of a &lt;i&gt;filibuster&lt;/i&gt;? Do you know what a filibuster is? It is an action taken in the Senate to &lt;i&gt;preclude&lt;/i&gt; a vote. A unanimous vote by Democrats against a bill (with the exception of Hollings, what the Dems did on &lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/106/senate/1/votes/105/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gramm-Leach-Bliley&lt;/a&gt;, for example) is NOT A FILIBUSTER. Please come back when you learn how to use the English language accurately. Also, if you realize that you have made an assertion that you cannot back up, please have the balls to admit that you said something that you have heard from other right-wingers but cannot actually document factually and therefore will get called on in a non-rightwing forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In both cases the Democrats united in lockstep to oppose the bill unanimously</i></p>
<p>Jay Tea, again, do you have any contemporaneous documentation of a <i>filibuster</i>? Do you know what a filibuster is? It is an action taken in the Senate to <i>preclude</i> a vote. A unanimous vote by Democrats against a bill (with the exception of Hollings, what the Dems did on <a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/106/senate/1/votes/105/" rel="nofollow">Gramm-Leach-Bliley</a>, for example) is NOT A FILIBUSTER. Please come back when you learn how to use the English language accurately. Also, if you realize that you have made an assertion that you cannot back up, please have the balls to admit that you said something that you have heard from other right-wingers but cannot actually document factually and therefore will get called on in a non-rightwing forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126669</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126669</guid>
		<description>I for one hope the democrats don&#039;t overreach, because I don&#039;t want to get pasted to the wall in &#039;10. A little circumspection might be in order. Not a lot, but enough to let those blue dog districts know we&#039;re not eeeeevil commie France just yet. 

Then again there&#039;s a fine line between circumspection and &#039;bending over.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one hope the democrats don&#8217;t overreach, because I don&#8217;t want to get pasted to the wall in &#8216;10. A little circumspection might be in order. Not a lot, but enough to let those blue dog districts know we&#8217;re not eeeeevil commie France just yet. </p>
<p>Then again there&#8217;s a fine line between circumspection and &#8216;bending over.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126652</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126652</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, Roschelle.  So the republicans distorted both Ayers&#039; views and his ties to Obama?  Who could have guessed?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Roschelle.  So the republicans distorted both Ayers&#8217; views and his ties to Obama?  Who could have guessed?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126651</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126651</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You can find plenty of examples of me saying that dissenters are wrong-headed and stupid and inviting disaster&lt;/i&gt;

And we may return the favor when you criticize something that the Obama administration and the dem-dominated congress actually _does_.  As long as you&#039;re dyspeptically imagining what they _might_ do we&#039;ll just call you what you are: a sorehead.

Also, as long as you continue to wail on the Fannie Mae mote in the democrats&#039; eye while ignoring the great deregulation beam in the republicans&#039;, we&#039;ll call you what you are: a real wanker of a tool.

But credit where it is due:  J.T. is far from the worst of the bunch.  For a real hard-on look at preemptive O.D.S. just take a gander at what&#039;s going on at The Corner or Michelle Malkin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You can find plenty of examples of me saying that dissenters are wrong-headed and stupid and inviting disaster</i></p>
<p>And we may return the favor when you criticize something that the Obama administration and the dem-dominated congress actually _does_.  As long as you&#8217;re dyspeptically imagining what they _might_ do we&#8217;ll just call you what you are: a sorehead.</p>
<p>Also, as long as you continue to wail on the Fannie Mae mote in the democrats&#8217; eye while ignoring the great deregulation beam in the republicans&#8217;, we&#8217;ll call you what you are: a real wanker of a tool.</p>
<p>But credit where it is due:  J.T. is far from the worst of the bunch.  For a real hard-on look at preemptive O.D.S. just take a gander at what&#8217;s going on at The Corner or Michelle Malkin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roschelle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126649</link>
		<dc:creator>Roschelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 14:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126649</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to share this in case you haven&#039;t seen it. Bill Ayers finally &lt;a href=&quot;http://roschellenelson.blogspot.com/2008/11/bill-ayers-finally-speaks.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;speaks&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to share this in case you haven&#8217;t seen it. Bill Ayers finally <a href="http://roschellenelson.blogspot.com/2008/11/bill-ayers-finally-speaks.html" rel="nofollow">speaks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midderpidge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126644</link>
		<dc:creator>midderpidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126644</guid>
		<description>There is dissent wisely applied and then there is the slash and burn obstruction perpetrated by the republicans of the last congress. It was amazing how they went from saying blocking anything was tantamount to treason to blocking everything was a-ok.  Look into it.  The democrats only blocked the very worst of things, they are a fractured caucus, peeling off a few on any vote was not only possible but likely.  Republicans are a closer group much more in lockstep.  They blocked far more in one congress than democrats did in two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is dissent wisely applied and then there is the slash and burn obstruction perpetrated by the republicans of the last congress. It was amazing how they went from saying blocking anything was tantamount to treason to blocking everything was a-ok.  Look into it.  The democrats only blocked the very worst of things, they are a fractured caucus, peeling off a few on any vote was not only possible but likely.  Republicans are a closer group much more in lockstep.  They blocked far more in one congress than democrats did in two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126643</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126643</guid>
		<description>Wilbur, care to cite a few examples of me saying otherwise?

You can find plenty of examples of me saying that dissenters are wrong-headed and stupid and inviting disaster, but saying that they are treasonous? I toss that around very, very carefully. And I&#039;ve mocked and derided and scorned those who do use it casually.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilbur, care to cite a few examples of me saying otherwise?</p>
<p>You can find plenty of examples of me saying that dissenters are wrong-headed and stupid and inviting disaster, but saying that they are treasonous? I toss that around very, very carefully. And I&#8217;ve mocked and derided and scorned those who do use it casually.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126642</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126642</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;For eight years, I’ve heard that “dissent is the highest form of patriotism.”&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, it is, and even though you&#039;ve spent the last eight years saying the opposite, it still applies to you.

However, you&#039;ll need to wait until the Obama administration pulls off a fuckup like Iraq or Katrina or the Gonzo DOJ for your dissent to sound like anything besides sour grapes on crack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>For eight years, I’ve heard that “dissent is the highest form of patriotism.”</i></p>
<p>Yes, it is, and even though you&#8217;ve spent the last eight years saying the opposite, it still applies to you.</p>
<p>However, you&#8217;ll need to wait until the Obama administration pulls off a fuckup like Iraq or Katrina or the Gonzo DOJ for your dissent to sound like anything besides sour grapes on crack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126638</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126638</guid>
		<description>For eight years, I&#039;ve heard that &quot;dissent is the highest form of patriotism.&quot; Guess that&#039;s all gone, with the new &quot;Hope and Change&quot; agenda...

Guess I&#039;ll just have to practice the New Patriotism and work on cheerfully parroting the latest talking points from the Obama administration... 

That&#039;s gonna take a LOT of work.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For eight years, I&#8217;ve heard that &#8220;dissent is the highest form of patriotism.&#8221; Guess that&#8217;s all gone, with the new &#8220;Hope and Change&#8221; agenda&#8230;</p>
<p>Guess I&#8217;ll just have to practice the New Patriotism and work on cheerfully parroting the latest talking points from the Obama administration&#8230; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s gonna take a LOT of work.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill L.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126632</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 10:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126632</guid>
		<description>For, what, 4 or 5 of the Bush years, the GOP controlled all branches of government, but Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are all the obstructionist democrats fault...

Riiiiight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For, what, 4 or 5 of the Bush years, the GOP controlled all branches of government, but Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are all the obstructionist democrats fault&#8230;</p>
<p>Riiiiight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126630</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 10:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126630</guid>
		<description>&quot;Man, talk about sore WINNERS…&quot;

Fuck you. The Republicans have been calling Liberals anti-American for years and you want to call us sore winners? You can just fuck off and die. 

&quot;Sean, I’m no financial expert...&quot;

So shut the fuck up already. 

&quot;I know that...&quot;

You know nothing, Jay Tea. If you think Fannie/Freddie caused this financial meltdown, then you know less than nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Man, talk about sore WINNERS…&#8221;</p>
<p>Fuck you. The Republicans have been calling Liberals anti-American for years and you want to call us sore winners? You can just fuck off and die. </p>
<p>&#8220;Sean, I’m no financial expert&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>So shut the fuck up already. </p>
<p>&#8220;I know that&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You know nothing, Jay Tea. If you think Fannie/Freddie caused this financial meltdown, then you know less than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126628</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 10:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126628</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sean, I’m no financial expert ,,,&quot;

And that&#039;s where I stopped reading. Thank you for putting that upfront, Jay Tea. It looks like you saved me a lot of time and brain cells. Much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sean, I’m no financial expert ,,,&#8221;</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s where I stopped reading. Thank you for putting that upfront, Jay Tea. It looks like you saved me a lot of time and brain cells. Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/11/08/elections-have-consequences-3/#comment-126627</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=11320#comment-126627</guid>
		<description>JT: &lt;i&gt;either I’m proven right, or the country benefits.&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;ve got it from the horse&#039;s mouth right there folks.  When JT is right, the country does not benefit.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT: <i>either I’m proven right, or the country benefits.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got it from the horse&#8217;s mouth right there folks.  When JT is right, the country does not benefit.  <img src='http://www.oliverwillis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
