Comments on: McCain & Palin: Frenemies!

By: Syco

Syco — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:16:54 +0000

speaking o Adulterers……
how in the hell did the republicans become the party of morality?

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:57:40 +0000

But Jindal is a Muslim exorcist, isn’t he?

Silly Duros. He’s a Republican Muslim exorcist. (Muslim. Hindu. Never mind. You’re on a roll.)

As we learned with adulterers, flip-floppers, bank socialists, rich guys, and draft dodgers, all those things are bad. If you’re a Democrat.

By: Duros Hussein62

Duros Hussein62 — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:08:40 +0000

But Jindal is a Muslim exorcist, isn’t he? That’s what I heard.

Maybe he can get that damn ghost out of the Lincoln bedroom.

By: PG

PG — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:39:44 +0000

Jindal 2012. The social conservatives love him, yet he doesn’t sound mentally deficient. He’ll bring the less-racist Palin fans together with the intellectuals. The former can swoon over his desire to castrate sex offenders and ban abortion even in cases of rape and incest; the latter can swoon over his Ivy League, Rhodes Scholar credentials. After he lost his first race, he learned how to politick among the bubbas and won his next two races. So long as enough of the hardcore racists in the party commit suicide over having a black president, Jindal is the clear choice.

However, I keep hearing people refer to it as Palin/ Jindal 2012, which is about as much testimony as we need for Republicans’ discomfort with having a person of color at the top. Never mind that he’s probably got twice the IQ and has a great track record of actual reform of Louisiana’s bureaucracy, particularly in health care. Somehow, Jindal gets assigned the VP position.

By: Randy Brown

Randy Brown — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:37:25 +0000

Sarah’s running the Brian Pillman loose cannon angle

Careful, jr. Remember what happened to Pillman while he was playing that angle…don’t want the rightards to infer something evil from that remark.

Closest wrestling analogy I can think up this moment is Palin playing Stephanie McMahon to McCain’s Mister McMahon. And of course, the entire McMahon family sucks ass – in real life as well as in the ring.

By: Duros Hussein 62

Duros Hussein 62 — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:48:23 +0000

Rouge cul!

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:47:27 +0000

Going rogue?

No, sorry for the confusion. She’s going rouge. Rouge cou!

By: Duros Hussein 62

Duros Hussein 62 — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:22:55 +0000

So she’s going rogue now?

Is that anything like Commando?

I guess when you got two Mavericks together, this is bound to happen.

By: Jet

Jet — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:17:00 +0000

So she’s going rogue now? Isn’t that somewhat of a synomyn for maverick? I wish these people would make up their minds what they are and what they want. Maybe they’ll get it together by December.

By: Sean D. Martin

Sean D. Martin — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:21:51 +0000

The Palin camp is fighting back, arguing that if the McCain campaign had just let Sarah Palin be Sarah Palin, she would have done just fine on her own.

This excuse is put forward every time a campaign goes south and I have just never gotten this argument. Don’t understand why anyone would fall for it.

So, you want to help run the country and stare down Putin when he looks over the horizon, but you can’t even stand up for yourself in your own campaign?

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:09:32 +0000

Apparently the three big GOP names for 2012 are Romney, Huckabee, and Palin. I can’t imagine any of those being able to save the party.

Romney: “I’m rich, Bitch!” Try arguing you are there to support the middle class when you are worth $200 million. Plus, he’s Mormon and I don’t think the GOP base trust him.

Huckabee: One of the ‘nice’ religious conservatives who believes you should help the poor, not just bash the gays. But He’s too extreme right-wing on a couple of social issues for the independents, and too left wing on economic issues for the base.

Palin: She’s an idiot. AND, she’s a terrible candidate. If she wins, it will be 1984 in reverse and could hurt the party for decades to come.

Personally, I think it will be someone from we haven’t heard of coming to the front. But I can’t imagine who.

That said, we haven’t won this yet and we have to remember one thing…

A Always
B Be
C Closing.

Always be closing.

By: jr

jr — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:43:39 +0000

Sarah’s running the Brian Pillman loose cannon angle