Republicans On Parade
Tweet

This is what all those people who watch Fox News and actually believe it sound like. Brainwashed morons.
13 Responses to “Republicans On Parade”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

I can go find a handful of Obama supporters that don’t know what they’re talking about (as you know, con media hosts do so regularly). No reason to impugn the intelligence of several million people, though.
But you know, I wouldn’t mind them eating brains so much if it made them any smarter.
I’d be inclined to post Howard Stern’s interview with several Obama supporters who said they’re fine with Sarah Palin as his running mate and what were standard Republican views, but I’d be accused of being racist.
Credit where it’s due, though; at least they are not undecided.
No reason to impugn the intelligence of several million people, though.
Fox News viewers are more likely to be misinformed about the news.
Let me see, making ignorant inflammatory statements about large groups of people based on assumptions resting upon very narrow anecdotal evidence, this differs from racism just exactly how?
But speaking of narrow anecdotal evidence of blatant racism, that Stern interview of “issue orientated, well informed” black voters is hilarious. Acorn’s contribution to an educated informed electorate perhaps.
I’d be inclined to post Howard Stern’s interview with several Obama supporters who said they’re fine with Sarah Palin as his running mate
Kinda evidence of their lack of understanding right there. Talk to a bunch of people who think Palin is Obama’s running mate and you’re bound to hear all sorts of odd things.
Let me see, making ignorant inflammatory statements about large groups of people based on assumptions resting upon very narrow anecdotal evidence, this differs from racism just exactly how?
I agree, AO. Why just yesterday, there was some yahoo–right here on this site–who was doing exactly what you describe:
What are you going to do with someone like that?
I’d be inclined to post Howard Stern’s interview with several Obama supporters who said they’re fine with Sarah Palin as his running mate and what were standard Republican views,
I’m sure Mr. Stern chose a representative sample of respondents for his presentation. After all, Mr. Stern is regularly cited as the gold standard of fairness and accuracy in journalism.
of course Dennis and Amused observer also left out where Sal Governali(guy doing the interviews from Howard Stern) did the same with McCain voters, but don’t let full context get in the way of making what you think is a valid point. Now back to the kids table you two:)
Oh my simple minded little subterranean pacifist,
Is it your contention that conservative political viewpoints are not routinely shouted down at many college campuses in this country?
Is your grasp of history so poor that you haven’t learned anything about European History in the years before WW2?
s it your contention that conservative political viewpoints are not routinely shouted down at many college campuses in this country?
You’re not very good with the obvious, are you AO? That was not my contention, at least not in my previous post.
My contention was that on Thursday you “ma[de] ignorant inflammatory statements about large groups of people based on assumptions resting upon very narrow anecdotal evidence,” and on Friday you boohoo’d about someone else using the very same tactic.
Tu quoque, sir! No backsies!
No Quaker,
As usually is the case, you can’t find the forest because of the trees.
What I said yesterday after Willis admitted making the standard leftist remarks about Nazi’s and conservatives is that Nazi stands for National Socialist Party, that the tactics of Hitler’s Nazi brownshirts were quite similar to both the tactics and viewpoints of current left wing activists on college campuses today. Trying to denying your political opponents an opportunity to be heard through intimidation and violence being the key similarities.
What I said today was that using a few hand selected videos and then tarring all the viewers of Fox News as morons is very similar to making ignorant assumptions about racial abilities and characteristics based on very small sets of data points.