Not like you could, seeing as you already sold it for a $500 tax rebate.

If I wanted to emulate people’s traffic, I would far rather want to emulate Kos or TPM or Atrios than an intellectually dishonest person like Reynolds.

Thanks for the morning laugh, Oliver.

IS there a more intellectually dishonest site on the net than Kos? Good lord. That is the site that deliberately publicizes the most obscenely wrong smears against anyone it opposes, then quietly deletes and buries the evidence when they are proven — yet again — to be completely and utterly lying scumbags. And they’ve even openly bemoaned that they aren’t lying enough.

I’d love to have Kos’ numbers — or even a significant fraction — for Wizbang. But I’m nowhere near ready to sell my soul to do it. I’ll stick to getting my traffic numbers in ways that let me continue to sleep at night.

J.

This is a decent blog and I wouldn’t post here if I didn’t think so, but it seems to me that since Glenn Reynolds, according to OW, lacks intellectual honesty, he would provide specific examples of that accusation. Intellectual honesty would dictate that an accusation of his having made up that he received an email from someone in a newsroom that claims the organization is totally in the tank for Obama be followed up with some sort of example, background, or evidence of prior fabrications from this respected man.

Intellectual honesty would also dictate that having hollered to high heaven about the injustices served on Obama by George Stephanopoulos in the ABC Democratic presidential debate, ABC’s Hannitized Debate, that he would take a similar stand about the fact that Gwen Ifill was chosen as a moderator for tomorrow night’s VP debate, given the fact that there is no question who she is voting for after having just written a book about Obama and that is set to go on sale the day of his inauguration. The Breakthrough
Politics and Race in the Age of Obama

Further evidence of Reynold’s contention that the fix is in.

Dennis, Oliver’s not the only one who makes fun of Glenn Reynolds. The ol’ Perfesser is a national laughingstock.

Dave, please go upstairs and eat the lunch mom made for you. Then go outside and get some fresh air.

Of course, if I’m the wannabe with a respectable amount of visitors and you’re the one commenting on my site without anything constructive to say…

And I’m not the IT guy at Media Matters, though he’s a smart and witty guy too.

You’d give your left nut to have a fraction of Instapundit’s traffic, wouldn’t you Oliver? That way, you could be more than a Media Matters IT guy and wanna-be BIG LEFTY BLOGGER that is your current lot in life.

Thanks for taking Obama’s cock out of your mouth long enough to split hairs and tell us that WHERE a compliment occurs (i.e. on his own blog vs. someone elses) apparently makes all the difference in the world whether one is a cocksucker or not.

You’re still a douchebag, though.

What? his linked user name didn’t clue you in? You don’t have to sign in either, that would put nearly all his subscribers in a funk, turnin’ over them special shoeboxes muttering “Password, Password…”

Give it a whurl, Dennis. You won’t be missed.

So it’s obvious just who the assclown is.

I complimented him here 1) because he did write a good blog post, 2)because Glenn Reynolds doesn’t have comments on his blog, and 3)because before just a few days ago, I didn’t know Jay Tea was even a blogger, nor am I signed in to comment on his blog.

Complimenting Jay on the mighty achievement of being linked to by Glenn Reynolds on Jay’s own blog would be one thing.

Complimenting Jay on the mighty achievement of being linked to by Glenn Reynolds on Oliver’s blog is another.

The former would be a direct communication from reader to author. The latter is a rather pointless demonstration of suckup-itude in front of a bunch of people who couldn’t give a rat’s ass.

Get it, assclown?

And as to Farris feigned offense at “questioning their patriotism”; when the Republicans themselves and especially the leader of their party run around saying that this bill is critical for the financial security of the nation, and then can stand up and say they are willing to throw over that great national matter because their little feelings are hurt, they demonstrate a high level of hypocrisy at minimum. When we then learn that they also planned to shiv the Democrats for passing the bill IN ADVANCE (by sending out attack ads BEFORE the bill was passed), while claiming it was great national import etc., that is hypocisy and betrayal rising to the level of treason (at least by the standards Republicans themselves have advocated the last eight years anyway)!

So every time someone here compliments Oliver on one of his posts, it REALLY means that they are sucking him off (after finding Obama’s appendage to be insufficiently filling)?

Thanks for the clarification.

Douchebag.