<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh Noes!!! Teh Lipstick!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: juhar</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/#comment-114637</link>
		<dc:creator>juhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=9105#comment-114637</guid>
		<description>The more I think about it, it&#039;s hillarious.  Obama got the Republicans to say that their VP candidate is the &quot;pig with lipstick&quot; that Obama was talking about in his analogy.  The Republicans are basically calling their candidate a &quot;pig with lipstick&quot; every time they demand an apology for the &quot;alleged&quot; pig.

The analogy that Sarah Palin wanted Americans to equate her with &quot;A hockey mom like a pit bull with lipstick&quot; - strong, and tough has not been replaced with Sarah Palin, Obama called her &quot;pig with lipstick.&quot;

Obama didn&#039;t call her a pig but he&#039;s got the whole United States saying Sarah Palin&#039;s name in very close vicinity with a &quot;pig with lipstick.&quot;

This is brillant.  This is transference at its best.  Now when people think of Sarah Palin they think of a pig with lipstick and Obama didn&#039;t say it the Republicans did.

And if this wasn&#039;t enough.  On David Letterman Obama said if he was talking about Sarah Palin she would be the lipstick and John McCain&#039;s policies would be the pig.  And there you have it.  Sarah Palin all over McCain and Obama didn&#039;t say it, he let you imagine it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I think about it, it&#8217;s hillarious.  Obama got the Republicans to say that their VP candidate is the &#8220;pig with lipstick&#8221; that Obama was talking about in his analogy.  The Republicans are basically calling their candidate a &#8220;pig with lipstick&#8221; every time they demand an apology for the &#8220;alleged&#8221; pig.</p>
<p>The analogy that Sarah Palin wanted Americans to equate her with &#8220;A hockey mom like a pit bull with lipstick&#8221; &#8211; strong, and tough has not been replaced with Sarah Palin, Obama called her &#8220;pig with lipstick.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama didn&#8217;t call her a pig but he&#8217;s got the whole United States saying Sarah Palin&#8217;s name in very close vicinity with a &#8220;pig with lipstick.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is brillant.  This is transference at its best.  Now when people think of Sarah Palin they think of a pig with lipstick and Obama didn&#8217;t say it the Republicans did.</p>
<p>And if this wasn&#8217;t enough.  On David Letterman Obama said if he was talking about Sarah Palin she would be the lipstick and John McCain&#8217;s policies would be the pig.  And there you have it.  Sarah Palin all over McCain and Obama didn&#8217;t say it, he let you imagine it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anotherbozo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/#comment-114605</link>
		<dc:creator>anotherbozo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=9105#comment-114605</guid>
		<description>Obama served aces on Letterman last night - mentioned that, had he intended the metaphor to include Palin, &quot;she would have been the lipstick.&quot;  Flattering her by calling her the cosmetic, and yet!  Loving it.  Now if only the American people can stand on their hind legs and vote their own interests for a change...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama served aces on Letterman last night &#8211; mentioned that, had he intended the metaphor to include Palin, &#8220;she would have been the lipstick.&#8221;  Flattering her by calling her the cosmetic, and yet!  Loving it.  Now if only the American people can stand on their hind legs and vote their own interests for a change&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/#comment-114588</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=9105#comment-114588</guid>
		<description>The point that should be made is how for 5 1/2 years of his life John McCain was not allowed to manufacture a false outrage. This American hero deserves full media compliance in his honorable charade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point that should be made is how for 5 1/2 years of his life John McCain was not allowed to manufacture a false outrage. This American hero deserves full media compliance in his honorable charade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/#comment-114580</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 03:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=9105#comment-114580</guid>
		<description>&quot;we love our Rove flavored catnip&quot;-cable newsies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;we love our Rove flavored catnip&#8221;-cable newsies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/#comment-114577</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 03:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=9105#comment-114577</guid>
		<description>Note to McCain &amp; Palin:

&lt;i&gt;Ha-haaa, charade you are.&lt;/i&gt;

(Apologies to Roger Waters/Pink Floyd)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to McCain &amp; Palin:</p>
<p><i>Ha-haaa, charade you are.</i></p>
<p>(Apologies to Roger Waters/Pink Floyd)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/#comment-114556</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=9105#comment-114556</guid>
		<description>Rovian politics: It&#039;s about everything except McCain&#039;s almost total agreement with Bush Republicanism. The stupider the distraction, the more they will continue to focus on it. Spouting lies (Obama&#039;s gonna raise your taxes! Palin sold the jet on ebay, at a profit!) is strategic maneuver. Rove wants all focus on &lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt; but McCain&#039;s politics. Truly a smelly old fish with lipstick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rovian politics: It&#8217;s about everything except McCain&#8217;s almost total agreement with Bush Republicanism. The stupider the distraction, the more they will continue to focus on it. Spouting lies (Obama&#8217;s gonna raise your taxes! Palin sold the jet on ebay, at a profit!) is strategic maneuver. Rove wants all focus on <i>anything</i> but McCain&#8217;s politics. Truly a smelly old fish with lipstick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corpsesicle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/#comment-114544</link>
		<dc:creator>Corpsesicle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=9105#comment-114544</guid>
		<description>New lipstick. Same old pig.

http://snipr.com/3p34r</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New lipstick. Same old pig.</p>
<p><a href="http://snipr.com/3p34r" rel="nofollow">http://snipr.com/3p34r</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juhar</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/10/oh-noes-teh-lipstick/#comment-114532</link>
		<dc:creator>juhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=9105#comment-114532</guid>
		<description>So, McCain by omission admits that he&#039;s a smelly old fish.

Well, if the lipstick sticks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, McCain by omission admits that he&#8217;s a smelly old fish.</p>
<p>Well, if the lipstick sticks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

