Wow. That’s an impressive lie.

Clinton wanted to send the military into Afghanistan. The REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS WOULD NOT LET HIM, so he fired a couple of cruise missiles instead.

Do you have any fresh baloney? This stuff you’re peddling has been out of date for several years.

Oh sure, he’s not going to invade Pakistan, per se, he merely wants to do a little breaking and entering, a bit of trespassing, maybe some illegal search and seizure.

I’m sure the people of Pakistan will understand the nuance of his position.

I am genuinely, genuinely half-laughing half-sobbing. It’s just incredible. You bastards. You venal bastards.

Funny, you ultra cons had no problems with doing the same with Iraq and Afghanistan.

Actually, it was an attempt to have a reasoned exchange with you. But since that seems impossible…

Terrorists don’t honor subpoenas, fyi.

That damn Clinton.

Oh sure, he’s not going to invade Pakistan, per se, he merely wants to do a little breaking and entering, a bit of trespassing, maybe some illegal search and seizure.

I’m sure the people of Pakistan will understand the nuance of his position.

Nice attempt to elevate saintly Obama above that brutish thug Bush.

I guess that’s all they have left: lies and distractions.

All they have left? Seriously, C. When have they ever really had anything else?

Neither. As usual, you are.

invasion – the act of an army that invades for conquest or plunder; entrance as if to take possession or overrun; the entrance of an armed force into a territory to conquer

Bush invaded Iraq. He went into the country to wage war against the country, overthrow its government and take over. Obama has never suggested going to war with Pakistan, replacing its government or taking over the country. He was very specific and clear (again, compare that with the vagueness and sloppiness of Bush et al): “If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.”

Not good enough.

Also, still no wingnuts responding to the 9/11 video I see.

After pointing out that Russia recently “invaded a small, democratic neighbor to gain more control over the world’s oil supply, intimidate other neighbors, and further their ambitions of reassembling the Russian empire” [what part of that isn't true?], he goes on to say “As President I will work to establish good relations with Russia so we need not fear a return of the Cold War. But we can’t turn a blind eye to aggression and international lawlessness that threatens the peace and stability of the world and the security of the American people”.

You should really drink less when watching TV or posting (preferably both).

You sounded a lot smarter when you weren’t posting.

“Fight with me”

Besides, pulling out of Iraq now or even before the end of 2009, WOULD BE the biggest foreign policy in US history, since JFK failed to support the Bay of Pigs invasion …

Have I got all the talking points now?