<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bubble Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:23:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dana Blankenhorn</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-113140</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Blankenhorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-113140</guid>
		<description>Brilliant stuff. The 2008 equivalent of the Dirty Fucking Hippies of 1968 are the men and women running the Republican Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant stuff. The 2008 equivalent of the Dirty Fucking Hippies of 1968 are the men and women running the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datadave</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112641</link>
		<dc:creator>datadave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112641</guid>
		<description>costume change...N close the italics!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>costume change&#8230;N close the italics!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datadave</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112640</link>
		<dc:creator>datadave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112640</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s be honest. Obama being black isn&#039;t exactly an easy card to play when so many in America as both Hillary and McCain will &#039;secretly&#039; admit &lt;i&gt;are not ready for a black man to be President&lt;/i&gt;..hint, hint, wink, wink.... 

and add that Obama&#039;s single parent was only 18 when she &quot;had&quot; him. And that he has &quot;no pedigree&quot; &lt;i&gt;unlike McCain&#039;s list of Admirals as forebears and an ultra rich trophy wife supplying him with unlimited houses and cash. Now McCain&#039;s running mate only has great legs, photogenic looks, and three houses...but is pretty much as &quot;safe&quot; and &quot;middle America&quot; as could be.

So Why is it that Republicans are way behind? 

Karl Rove??? He&#039;s reported to be upset as the Repugs Lost the Hispanic vote which like the black vote is going 90 percent Obama (except for Little Havana_)

Now Listening to Huckabee accuse the &quot;Elite Media&quot; of picking on Sarah, Sarah, Sarah...... as being 

&quot;tackier than a custom change at a Madonna concert....&quot; 
cute, (personally I think he woulda been an awesome Repug. candidate...) But Repugs couldn&#039;t bear him.....preferring the &quot;mean&quot; Elite Republican media ignoring stuff 

like this typical Republican comment: 

    &quot;Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because Janet Reno is her father&quot;.

    -John McCain, 1998</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be honest. Obama being black isn&#8217;t exactly an easy card to play when so many in America as both Hillary and McCain will &#8217;secretly&#8217; admit <i>are not ready for a black man to be President</i>..hint, hint, wink, wink&#8230;. </p>
<p>and add that Obama&#8217;s single parent was only 18 when she &#8220;had&#8221; him. And that he has &#8220;no pedigree&#8221; <i>unlike McCain&#8217;s list of Admirals as forebears and an ultra rich trophy wife supplying him with unlimited houses and cash. Now McCain&#8217;s running mate only has great legs, photogenic looks, and three houses&#8230;but is pretty much as &#8220;safe&#8221; and &#8220;middle America&#8221; as could be.</p>
<p>So Why is it that Republicans are way behind? </p>
<p>Karl Rove??? He&#8217;s reported to be upset as the Repugs Lost the Hispanic vote which like the black vote is going 90 percent Obama (except for Little Havana_)</p>
<p>Now Listening to Huckabee accuse the &#8220;Elite Media&#8221; of picking on Sarah, Sarah, Sarah&#8230;&#8230; as being </p>
<p>&#8220;tackier than a custom change at a Madonna concert&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
cute, (personally I think he woulda been an awesome Repug. candidate&#8230;) But Repugs couldn&#8217;t bear him&#8230;..preferring the &#8220;mean&#8221; Elite Republican media ignoring stuff </p>
<p>like this typical Republican comment: </p>
<p>    &#8220;Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because Janet Reno is her father&#8221;.</p>
<p>    -John McCain, 1998</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros Hussein 62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112624</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros Hussein 62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112624</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why the hostility, Duros?&lt;/i&gt;

None whatsoever. Why do you ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why the hostility, Duros?</i></p>
<p>None whatsoever. Why do you ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112551</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112551</guid>
		<description>I must have missed something -- Dr Pedro is now the aptly named &#039;duh&#039;? OW has some o&#039; the lamest trolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have missed something &#8212; Dr Pedro is now the aptly named &#8216;duh&#8217;? OW has some o&#8217; the lamest trolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112546</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112546</guid>
		<description>What is it exactly that Conservatives conserve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it exactly that Conservatives conserve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scratch</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112544</link>
		<dc:creator>Scratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112544</guid>
		<description>Why the hostility, Duros?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the hostility, Duros?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros Hussein 62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112534</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros Hussein 62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112534</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/109960/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Hits-50-First-Time.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Obama&#039;s up by 9.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;The results of a poll are, by my definition, precisely as they should be.&lt;/i&gt;

I see. Then STFU about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/109960/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Hits-50-First-Time.aspx" rel="nofollow"><br />
Obama&#8217;s up by 9.</a></p>
<p><i>The results of a poll are, by my definition, precisely as they should be.</i></p>
<p>I see. Then STFU about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD100</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112489</link>
		<dc:creator>PD100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112489</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;” Crude futures for October delivery were down $2.23 to $107.48 a barrel.&lt;/i&gt;

  Crude prices are indeed down –Down from 121.00 per barrel in August but still a skosh up from &lt;b&gt;$28.66&lt;/b&gt; per barrel in January 2001. 


&lt;i&gt;&quot;We just handed ANBAR province back to Iraq.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

  As for the rousing triumph over Iraq, excuse me, Anbar- well, U.S. troops are still in Iraq and still in harm’s way. By the way, the newest timetable proposal says nothing about a total withdrawal, nor has it been ratified. 

 Not exactly a smackdown scenario but if you want to break out the USA#1 foam finger and crank up the Dueling Banjos, have at it. We’ll just keep laughing at you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>” Crude futures for October delivery were down $2.23 to $107.48 a barrel.</i></p>
<p>  Crude prices are indeed down –Down from 121.00 per barrel in August but still a skosh up from <b>$28.66</b> per barrel in January 2001. </p>
<p><i>&#8220;We just handed ANBAR province back to Iraq.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>  As for the rousing triumph over Iraq, excuse me, Anbar- well, U.S. troops are still in Iraq and still in harm’s way. By the way, the newest timetable proposal says nothing about a total withdrawal, nor has it been ratified. </p>
<p> Not exactly a smackdown scenario but if you want to break out the USA#1 foam finger and crank up the Dueling Banjos, have at it. We’ll just keep laughing at you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scratch</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112486</link>
		<dc:creator>Scratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112486</guid>
		<description>Repack...

I think a poll is good for exactly one thing:  measuring how random people will respond to questions in a poll.  The results of a poll are, by my definition, precisely as they should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repack&#8230;</p>
<p>I think a poll is good for exactly one thing:  measuring how random people will respond to questions in a poll.  The results of a poll are, by my definition, precisely as they should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iggy</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112484</link>
		<dc:creator>Iggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112484</guid>
		<description>Oliver, this may be the best thing I&#039;ve ever seen you write.

That&#039;s one terrific article.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver, this may be the best thing I&#8217;ve ever seen you write.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one terrific article.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112482</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112482</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;EL seemed to suggest that Obama should be ahead by 15 points&lt;/i&gt;

How far do YOU think he should be ahead, and why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>EL seemed to suggest that Obama should be ahead by 15 points</i></p>
<p>How far do YOU think he should be ahead, and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scratch</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112481</link>
		<dc:creator>Scratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112481</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Gore, on the other hand, did win.&lt;/i&gt;

...except for the winning part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Gore, on the other hand, did win.</i></p>
<p>&#8230;except for the winning part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112478</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112478</guid>
		<description>Kerry didn&#039;t deserve to win. I mean, he should have, because he was running against Bush, but he didn&#039;t. Like Kinnock in 1992, if you can&#039;t beat &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt;, you need a slap.

Gore, on the other hand, did win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerry didn&#8217;t deserve to win. I mean, he should have, because he was running against Bush, but he didn&#8217;t. Like Kinnock in 1992, if you can&#8217;t beat <i>that</i>, you need a slap.</p>
<p>Gore, on the other hand, did win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scratch</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112477</link>
		<dc:creator>Scratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112477</guid>
		<description>Yes EL, hence the &quot;seemed to suggest.&quot;  When one says that a party &quot;deserves to be ahead&quot; by such and such...well, if you that is really true then it would be reflected in the polls, would it not?  Otherwise, how do we define what a party &quot;deserves.&quot;  Just like Gore &quot;deserved&quot; to win and Kerry &quot;deserved&quot; to win, eh?  

I think the current polls reflect pretty much exactly what Obama and the Republicans &quot;deserve,&quot; which is to say, a close race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes EL, hence the &#8220;seemed to suggest.&#8221;  When one says that a party &#8220;deserves to be ahead&#8221; by such and such&#8230;well, if you that is really true then it would be reflected in the polls, would it not?  Otherwise, how do we define what a party &#8220;deserves.&#8221;  Just like Gore &#8220;deserved&#8221; to win and Kerry &#8220;deserved&#8221; to win, eh?  </p>
<p>I think the current polls reflect pretty much exactly what Obama and the Republicans &#8220;deserve,&#8221; which is to say, a close race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112474</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112474</guid>
		<description>I suggested no such thing.  Dr. P did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggested no such thing.  Dr. P did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scratch</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112471</link>
		<dc:creator>Scratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112471</guid>
		<description>Hi Repack...

EL seemed to suggest that Obama should be ahead by 15 points.  Curious that he is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Repack&#8230;</p>
<p>EL seemed to suggest that Obama should be ahead by 15 points.  Curious that he is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112468</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112468</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Given the performance of Bush in the past 8 years, and the loss of Congress by the Republicans two years ago, how far ahead in the polls do you think Obama should be right now?&lt;/i&gt;

Far enough ahead to win.  A win is a win.

GW Bush lost the popular election in 2000, but he still got to be president and trash our country.  How important can the margin of victory be?

O-Dub: Great post.  This is what blogging should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Given the performance of Bush in the past 8 years, and the loss of Congress by the Republicans two years ago, how far ahead in the polls do you think Obama should be right now?</i></p>
<p>Far enough ahead to win.  A win is a win.</p>
<p>GW Bush lost the popular election in 2000, but he still got to be president and trash our country.  How important can the margin of victory be?</p>
<p>O-Dub: Great post.  This is what blogging should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112465</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112465</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

“The Iraqi war is cleaning up nicely, thank you. Oil is looking to go under 3 digits a barrel.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;Oh well then a million or so people did not die in vain huh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>“The Iraqi war is cleaning up nicely, thank you. Oil is looking to go under 3 digits a barrel.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh well then a million or so people did not die in vain huh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/09/03/the-bubble-convention/#comment-112460</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8901#comment-112460</guid>
		<description>What was the crude oil price at the beginning of the Bush regime?  What was the crude oil price at the beginning of Bush&#039;s 2nd term?

Give it up &quot;Dr&quot; Pee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the crude oil price at the beginning of the Bush regime?  What was the crude oil price at the beginning of Bush&#8217;s 2nd term?</p>
<p>Give it up &#8220;Dr&#8221; Pee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
