Do you think that voting for a Republican president leads to security violations like that committed by Gonzales? If so, then what led to the violation committed by Deutch?

For those not aware, Deutch was the DIRECTOR OF THE CIA when he was using the home computers for classified work.

Over two years after his departure, the matter was referred to the Department of Justice, where Attorney General Janet Reno declined prosecution. She did, however, recommend an investigation to determine whether Deutch should retain his security clearance. President Clinton pardoned Deutch on his last day in office. (Wikipedia)

Remember – American law only applies to non-Republicans.

No prosecution, no fine, no disbarment, no plea.

How many years did it take for the Berger stuff to make its way through the justice system?

Of course Gonzales deserves some sort of punishment. My original comment neither says nor implies anything different. I just wonder how obvious of a hack do you need to be to associate this with voting for a Republican?

Let’s compare outcomes, shall we?

Sandy Berger (from the Wiki):

Berger eventually pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material on April 1, 2005. Berger was fined $50,000 [16], sentenced to serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service, and stripped of his security clearance for 3 years.[17] Berger also relinquished his license to practice law.

Andrew Gonzales:

NOTHING. No prosecution, no fine, no disbarment, no plea. Yeah, he broke the law, but we need to move forward, right?

Remember – American law only applies to non-Republicans. Republicans are always right, no matter what the law says. That’s how it works when you create your own reality.

Oh well, at least we’re not Yale.

Sandy “Burglar”

There, now isn’t THAT a nice little cup of STFU……