Yeah, she’s prettier than usual, but it’s the same old Republican conservative bull from Sarah Palin.
UPDATE: I wonder if McCain will eventually eject Palin, Harriet Miers style?
Breaking News
Hurricane Ida Targets US Gulf Coast
Yeah, she’s prettier than usual, but it’s the same old Republican conservative bull from Sarah Palin.
UPDATE: I wonder if McCain will eventually eject Palin, Harriet Miers style?
That’s pretty damn ugly. I don’t know any elected officials of any party who at that point wouldn’t have shut the yahoo up.
The nervous giggle is also not exactly what I am seeking in a future leader.
Brilliant! I was hoping McCain would pick Katharine Harris, and he pick,ed Harris 2.0. Just brilliant.
I don’t know any Republicans who would hold a co-chair of an organization and launch my Political Career in the home of an unrepentant Terrorist who wishes he “could have done more” after planning and executing terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and Congress of the United States of America.
I don’t know any Republican Politicians who campaign on promises of Hope, Change, and Unity after attending a Church for 20 years that prescribes to Black Liberation Theology.
Sticks and stones may break bones, but laughing at someone never will.
Detonating Explosive devices in Federal Buildings is far less a crime than laughing at someone else’s character attacks in the eyes of the delusional Lefties.
I falsely willed myself towards the high road, but obviously intellectual, logical discourse must fall under the hammer of ignorance and lying.
I can’t wait ’til the Republicans start rolling out massive ad campaigns of Jeremiah Wright, Pfleger, Ayers, Farrakhan et al in predominantly White Working Class areas of Ohio and Pennsylvania right before the election. Should play well along with Obama’s “Cling to Guns and Religion” Redux in the Mid-West.
Nothing like hearing a candidate shit all over a constituencies heritage and core belief system right before heading to the election booth.
Congratulations John! You couldn’t even pretend to discuss the issue at hand. Look over there! It’s a debunked boogey man!
This reminds me of the town meeting where one of McCain’s supporters asked him “how do we beat the bitch?” meaning HRC. McCain laughed right along. But this kind of thing a quite pleasing to a large swath of their supporters.
I falsely willed myself towards the high road,
Wait, hold on, when the fuck did you do that? You’ve been flinging this same old poo since you got here today. Your talking points are old and have been disposed of long ago. You need to grow the fuck up and shut the fuck up.
You’re not gonna vote for the guy, we get it. Now go ‘way.
She probably laughs at South Park too…the biatch!
“Congratulations John! You couldn’t even pretend to discuss the issue at hand. Look over there! It’s a debunked boogey man!”
Doesn’t matter in gutter politics. Which is where this campaign headed a long time ago.
Have fun with spinning blatantly Anti-American, Racist, and Leftist Terrorist comments 12 hoours before the polls open. =D
she was laughing at the host…..
where is the righteous indignation at the National Chairman of the Democrats and Congressman Spratt (d) laughing at the thought of a hurricane hitting the US and messing up the headlines for the GOP convention?
Duros Hussein 62,
You’re the one who claimed all my posts prior to today were boring and dispassionate as I proclaimed the idea of looking at the facts and candidates as a whole.
And I have yet to attack a single person on this board personally. Congratulations to you and others for showing yet again that Obama supporters can only attack people and not defend the ideas of your candidate – because he’s an empty suit regurgitating bumper stickers.
More death centered humor from the “party of life”
Who Jr, the democrats?
Look at these cold-hearted bastards laughing at the prospect of a hurricane hitting New Orleans again.
Unbelievable
http://townhall.com/blog/g/11c5c3a8-6cdf-44a4-9511-45eb8edb8ce9
“she was laughing at the host…”
And that’s a DEFENSE of her behavior here how?
“where is the righteous indignation at the National Chairman of the Democrats and Congressman Spratt (d) laughing at the thought of a hurricane hitting the US and messing up the headlines for the GOP convention?”
That’s wrong as well, but unless Biden had said those things, the comparison isn’t valid. Neither the National Chairman of the Democrats nor Congressman Spratt are VP nominees.
No Rotter, it is an EXPLANATION of her behavior. You don’t need to defend laughing at a talk show host.
And it is completely valid, as there is no other explanation for the horrible behavior demonstrated by senior Democrat party operatives laughing at a pending disaster in a city still reeling from its previous one.
“No, Rotter, it is an EXPLANATION of her behavior”.
Just because behavior can be explained, doesn’t mean it should be excused. You seemed to be excusing her behavior by saying that she was laughing at the host.
“And it is completely valid,…”
No, it is not. A sitting governor acting horribly is worse than “party operatives” acting horribly.
Rotter, please read what I wrote.
No.Excuse.Necessary. Laughing at a talk show host
No Rotter, it is an EXPLANATION of her behavior. You don’t need to defend laughing at a talk show host.
And it is completely valid, as there is no other explanation for the horrible behavior demonstrated by senior Democrat party operatives laughing at a pending disaster in a city still reeling from its previous one.
At that point, you don’t laugh at the host and continue. If you’re a politician, you correct the host and continue. IIRC, even John McSame in the “bitch” Q&A laughed and then mumbled a disclaimer.
The only thing I can say in Palin’s defense is that on many liberal blogs, in the comments, people will say grotesque and outrageous remarks, and many of us will do the same as Palin, ignore the obvious bigotry, racism, sexism, insensitivity and continue. Neither our fellow commenters or ourselves are running for President or President-in-waiting, so she should behave better. (But so should we.)
Considering what the talk show host was saying, yes there is an explanation necessary.
“Duros Hussein 62:
You’re the one who claimed all my posts….were boring…”
No, John, I’m pretty sure that was me.
Is laughing at a talk show host automatically not a bad thing? Doesn’t it depend on what the host is saying?
Still not a word on the glee expressed by senior Democrat party officials at the impending CAT 5 Hurricane about to hit america’s gulf coast.
F’ing hypocrites…
Still not a word on not “party officials” but a FRIGGIN GOVERNOR publicly laughing at the mockery of a cancer survivor.
F’ing hypocrites…
Should the two Democrats in the video apologize for their remarks? Yes. Are either of them VP nominees? No.
So…just so we are straight. You can’t criticize someone who has survived cancer?
Just curious to see what the proposed ground rules are…
The two Democrats were chucking at the TIMING of a Hurricane coming at the same TIME as the scheduled RNC Convention. Maybe God is trying to tell us all something or remind us.
So the hurricane is a divine intervention in favor of the Democrat party?
duh, you are saying that, not me. There was nothing in that video that even suggested that the men wanted the hurricane to hit and or cause lost of human life or property damage. They were only talking about the TIMING of the threat coming at the time of the Republicans’ convention.
Do you remember the “much to do about nothing” video of Madeleine Albright at her hairdresser joking about a potential Republican October surprise for the November election during Clinton’s administration.
Much to do about nothing.
Those of us in Louisiana don’t exactly have time to joke around about divine intervention and timing. There’s much work left to do before the storm hits. But needless to say, when we get ’round to it, the matter shall be discussed.
“You can’t criticize someone who has survived cancer”.
I’m taking it you meant “shouldn’t” instead of “can’t” (which kind of implies that it is actually illegal to criticize someone who has survived cancer, which it, of course, is not) so I’ll respond in that context: No, you shouldn’t, if the specific criticism involves calling the cancer survivor “a cancer”.
It seems the stalwarts of the Democratic Party can and did run an excellent Convention. Now, the Repugs let a little storm get in the way of theirs.
Now if they’d built those levy’s stronger in New Orleans we wouldn’t be worrying would we? Instead the Republicans Bush and the Gov. of Mississipi and Lousiana spent 200 billion dollars on lining the pockets of Republican contractors and investors who used illegal labor while keeping most of the money for themselves and still the Gulf Coast isn’t built… (and the casinos are all that’s left for employment in Gulfport-Biloxi and precious little good paying work in New Orleans.
Yeah, the Republicans need to go run and hide.
Hehehehe….democratic gov and democrat mayor of NO during Katrina, now it’s if the “the republicans” had just built the levies better..
hehehehe….you guys crack me up.
this is stupid. really, is this the best us liberals can do? the host called her “a cancer” once. what was she supposed to do, stop the guy mid sentence and explain that this woman had had cancer so he shouldn’t call her “a cancer”? it’s not like the guy made a repeated habit of it. he said it once and no harm was intended. ridiculous.
Uh, yeah, that’s what she was supposed to do.
Am I missing irony here? Or do you actually mean that “no harm was intended” when the guy called the woman a “bitch” and a “cancer”? Or that the nervous giggle from Palin was the appropriate response?
“Us liberals?” GOP mole found, methinks.
By the time girlfriend undergoes Oct. investigation for having allegedly asked that her former brother-in-law be fired from his trooper gig, it’ll be too close and distracting to Nov. 4 to jettison her. Bad news for the GOP, who clearly made a bold, change-oriented selection in reaction to Obama’s speech and Dem “unity”.
“…what was she supposed to do, stop the guy mid sentence and explain that this woman had had cancer so she shouldnt call her a ‘cancer’?
I second Bruce. Yes, that was what she was supposed to do.