<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Biden: Obama/Biden 2008 Is The Democratic Ticket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:10:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109956</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109956</guid>
		<description>Parth, I was 10 years old when LBJ signed the 1964 Act. I&#039;m 54. Biden is 65. So he was 20 or 21 at the time. Which further buttresses your, and Hacker&#039;s, point. It&#039;s a good one. 
This is coming from a native white Southerner who has struggled to put away my (practically) inborn prejudices all my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parth, I was 10 years old when LBJ signed the 1964 Act. I&#8217;m 54. Biden is 65. So he was 20 or 21 at the time. Which further buttresses your, and Hacker&#8217;s, point. It&#8217;s a good one.<br />
This is coming from a native white Southerner who has struggled to put away my (practically) inborn prejudices all my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109946</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109946</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Andrew Hacker convincingly argued that all white people, disavow it or not, inherit a racist perspective from our racist heritage. &lt;/i&gt;

Been thinking about this comment a bit. I thought it was blather when I first read it, but the more I think about the more it seems to make sense. Just as it would have been politically radical in Lincoln&#039;s time to believe African-Americans were capable of being intellectually and socially equals to white Americans, so men Sen. Biden&#039;s age may have inherited a (to put it politely) less progressive perspective, having been 11 years old when LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act. 

Not an apology for dumbo comments. Just a half-baked thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Andrew Hacker convincingly argued that all white people, disavow it or not, inherit a racist perspective from our racist heritage. </i></p>
<p>Been thinking about this comment a bit. I thought it was blather when I first read it, but the more I think about the more it seems to make sense. Just as it would have been politically radical in Lincoln&#8217;s time to believe African-Americans were capable of being intellectually and socially equals to white Americans, so men Sen. Biden&#8217;s age may have inherited a (to put it politely) less progressive perspective, having been 11 years old when LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act. </p>
<p>Not an apology for dumbo comments. Just a half-baked thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109902</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109902</guid>
		<description>Helpful hint for JK: California was still won by a Democrat. Because it was the DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY. There weren&#039;t any non-Democrats on the form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helpful hint for JK: California was still won by a Democrat. Because it was the DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY. There weren&#8217;t any non-Democrats on the form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109872</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109872</guid>
		<description>&quot;Biden, October 2001: &#039;Let’s give two hundred million dollars to Iran. No strings attached.&#039;&quot;

Jay Tea, if you read that whole TNR article you&#039;d understand that this is not a serious policy proposal on Biden&#039;s part but indicative of his rhetorical and personal style. Yes, throwing out grandiose ideas designed to provoke certain responses or simply saying what&#039;s on your mind are bound to get any politician in trouble which is why most of them don&#039;t do this sort of thing. Biden doesn&#039;t seem to give a shit. Would Joe Biden ever actually propose and vote for giving $200 million to Iran, no strings attached? I highly doubt it. But Biden was trying to make a larger point about how the US should respond to 9-11 and he did it by throwing out the most provocative idea he could think of to start the ball rolling. Of course, Biden had moved on to something else seconds after saying. He wasn&#039;t seriously proposing it. 

At the same time, when McCain goes off half-cocked and starts singing about bombing Iran, there&#039;s considerable doubt about whether this is rhetorical flourish or really want McCain wants to do regardless. That&#039;s a little more frightening to a lot of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Biden, October 2001: &#8216;Let’s give two hundred million dollars to Iran. No strings attached.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Jay Tea, if you read that whole TNR article you&#8217;d understand that this is not a serious policy proposal on Biden&#8217;s part but indicative of his rhetorical and personal style. Yes, throwing out grandiose ideas designed to provoke certain responses or simply saying what&#8217;s on your mind are bound to get any politician in trouble which is why most of them don&#8217;t do this sort of thing. Biden doesn&#8217;t seem to give a shit. Would Joe Biden ever actually propose and vote for giving $200 million to Iran, no strings attached? I highly doubt it. But Biden was trying to make a larger point about how the US should respond to 9-11 and he did it by throwing out the most provocative idea he could think of to start the ball rolling. Of course, Biden had moved on to something else seconds after saying. He wasn&#8217;t seriously proposing it. </p>
<p>At the same time, when McCain goes off half-cocked and starts singing about bombing Iran, there&#8217;s considerable doubt about whether this is rhetorical flourish or really want McCain wants to do regardless. That&#8217;s a little more frightening to a lot of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109863</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109863</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Given that Obama “limped” across the finish line against Clinton and didn’t win the vast majority of the major states (eg; PA; Ohio, CALIFORNIA) that you absolutely need to win as a Democrat,&lt;/i&gt;

California?

Seriously?

Heh.

Heh heh. 

You ever been there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Given that Obama “limped” across the finish line against Clinton and didn’t win the vast majority of the major states (eg; PA; Ohio, CALIFORNIA) that you absolutely need to win as a Democrat,</i></p>
<p>California?</p>
<p>Seriously?</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>Heh heh. </p>
<p>You ever been there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109857</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109857</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I am absolutely stumped as to how Obama wins this thing at this point.&lt;/i&gt;

My guess is by being the better candidate.

&lt;i&gt;And it makes me happy.&lt;/i&gt;

4 more years of denying homosexuals civil rights and pointless wars! Hooray!

&lt;i&gt;Given that Obama “limped” across the finish line against Clinton and didn’t win the vast majority of the major states (eg; PA; Ohio, CALIFORNIA) that you absolutely need to win as a Democrat, &lt;/i&gt;

That only makes any sense if the vast majority of people who voted for Clinton go to McCain. We&#039;re seeing 10% at worst I believe.

&lt;I&gt;and that the Obama camp is in total free-fall as of late,&lt;/i&gt;

He&#039;s been picking up lately since McCain&#039;s 7 houses &amp; 7 families gaffe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I am absolutely stumped as to how Obama wins this thing at this point.</i></p>
<p>My guess is by being the better candidate.</p>
<p><i>And it makes me happy.</i></p>
<p>4 more years of denying homosexuals civil rights and pointless wars! Hooray!</p>
<p><i>Given that Obama “limped” across the finish line against Clinton and didn’t win the vast majority of the major states (eg; PA; Ohio, CALIFORNIA) that you absolutely need to win as a Democrat, </i></p>
<p>That only makes any sense if the vast majority of people who voted for Clinton go to McCain. We&#8217;re seeing 10% at worst I believe.</p>
<p><i>and that the Obama camp is in total free-fall as of late,</i></p>
<p>He&#8217;s been picking up lately since McCain&#8217;s 7 houses &amp; 7 families gaffe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colorado Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109855</link>
		<dc:creator>Colorado Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109855</guid>
		<description>The only way Biden makes sense is to lock up Pennsylvania. If the Dems saw Pennsylvania as toss-up picking Biden to lock it up makes sense. 

The big problem is how much Biden costs the Dems in areas (THE WEST) where we have been making up ground. 

Anyone who is canvasing or phone-banking for Obama in the RM 
West just had their job get that much harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way Biden makes sense is to lock up Pennsylvania. If the Dems saw Pennsylvania as toss-up picking Biden to lock it up makes sense. </p>
<p>The big problem is how much Biden costs the Dems in areas (THE WEST) where we have been making up ground. </p>
<p>Anyone who is canvasing or phone-banking for Obama in the RM<br />
West just had their job get that much harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109852</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109852</guid>
		<description>Biden is a spectaclar choice, given the enormous significance of the Delaware vote in the last 15 presidential elections. 

Sarcasm, aside...while it&#039;s true Biden is a very capable, smart guy, I&#039;ve always found him a bit of a loose cannon. And, let&#039;s face it, if he were any good on the stump, he&#039;d have won a primary or two, or at least been competetive. 

Given that Obama &quot;limped&quot; across the finish line against Clinton and didn&#039;t win the vast majority of the major states (eg; PA; Ohio, CALIFORNIA) that you absolutely need to win as a Democrat, and that the Obama camp is in total free-fall as of late,  I&#039;m starting to sense a McCain landslide may be in the works. 

Amazing...considering the early energy generated early on by Obama. 

I am absolutely stumped as to how Obama wins this thing at this point. And it makes me happy. 

JK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biden is a spectaclar choice, given the enormous significance of the Delaware vote in the last 15 presidential elections. </p>
<p>Sarcasm, aside&#8230;while it&#8217;s true Biden is a very capable, smart guy, I&#8217;ve always found him a bit of a loose cannon. And, let&#8217;s face it, if he were any good on the stump, he&#8217;d have won a primary or two, or at least been competetive. </p>
<p>Given that Obama &#8220;limped&#8221; across the finish line against Clinton and didn&#8217;t win the vast majority of the major states (eg; PA; Ohio, CALIFORNIA) that you absolutely need to win as a Democrat, and that the Obama camp is in total free-fall as of late,  I&#8217;m starting to sense a McCain landslide may be in the works. </p>
<p>Amazing&#8230;considering the early energy generated early on by Obama. </p>
<p>I am absolutely stumped as to how Obama wins this thing at this point. And it makes me happy. </p>
<p>JK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109851</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109851</guid>
		<description>By the way, thanks for the links, Jay Tea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, thanks for the links, Jay Tea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109850</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109850</guid>
		<description>Ok, for the 2nd one, I&#039;ll grant you the validity there. I understand his reasoning, but see that it&#039;s a bit after the fact and doesn&#039;t help in that current situation. OK

The first one, however, sounds completely made up, and the fact that you linked The New Republic does nothing to assauge that feeling. I&#039;m sorry, but this is setting off my BS meter.


To get back on topic, I have my reservations about Obama&#039;s VP pick, but I&#039;m certainly willing to give him a chance. Let&#039;s just see where this goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, for the 2nd one, I&#8217;ll grant you the validity there. I understand his reasoning, but see that it&#8217;s a bit after the fact and doesn&#8217;t help in that current situation. OK</p>
<p>The first one, however, sounds completely made up, and the fact that you linked The New Republic does nothing to assauge that feeling. I&#8217;m sorry, but this is setting off my BS meter.</p>
<p>To get back on topic, I have my reservations about Obama&#8217;s VP pick, but I&#8217;m certainly willing to give him a chance. Let&#8217;s just see where this goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109849</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109849</guid>
		<description>Oh, what the hell, here&#039;s the partition one:

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLN9698420080823?pageNumber=1&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10112

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, what the hell, here&#8217;s the partition one:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLN9698420080823?pageNumber=1&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10112" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLN9698420080823?pageNumber=1&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10112</a></p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109848</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109848</guid>
		<description>Apologies, Zython. I should have included at least one link (two seems to trigger the moderation monster). The $200 million:

&lt;blockquote&gt;At the Tuesday-morning meeting with committee staffers, Biden launches into a stream-of-consciousness monologue about what his committee should be doing, before he finally admits the obvious: &quot;I&#039;m groping here.&quot; Then he hits on an idea: America needs to show the Arab world that we&#039;re not bent on its destruction. &quot;Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran,&quot; Biden declares. He surveys the table with raised eyebrows, a How do ya like that? look on his face.

The staffers sit in silence. Finally somebody ventures a response: &quot;I think they&#039;d send it back.&quot; Then another aide speaks up delicately: &quot;The thing I would worry about is that it would almost look like a publicity stunt.&quot; Still another reminds Biden that an Iranian delegation is in Moscow that very day to discuss a $300 million arms deal with Vladimir Putin that the United States has strongly condemned. But Joe Biden is barely listening anymore. He&#039;s already moved on to something else.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://www.tnr.com/columnists/story.html?id=ba9b09bb-ed01-4582-b6ec-444834c9df73&amp;k=93697

That&#039;s one. I&#039;m going to bed now, but if you want the other one (the partitioned Iraq one), I&#039;ll post it later.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies, Zython. I should have included at least one link (two seems to trigger the moderation monster). The $200 million:</p>
<blockquote><p>At the Tuesday-morning meeting with committee staffers, Biden launches into a stream-of-consciousness monologue about what his committee should be doing, before he finally admits the obvious: &#8220;I&#8217;m groping here.&#8221; Then he hits on an idea: America needs to show the Arab world that we&#8217;re not bent on its destruction. &#8220;Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran,&#8221; Biden declares. He surveys the table with raised eyebrows, a How do ya like that? look on his face.</p>
<p>The staffers sit in silence. Finally somebody ventures a response: &#8220;I think they&#8217;d send it back.&#8221; Then another aide speaks up delicately: &#8220;The thing I would worry about is that it would almost look like a publicity stunt.&#8221; Still another reminds Biden that an Iranian delegation is in Moscow that very day to discuss a $300 million arms deal with Vladimir Putin that the United States has strongly condemned. But Joe Biden is barely listening anymore. He&#8217;s already moved on to something else.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.tnr.com/columnists/story.html?id=ba9b09bb-ed01-4582-b6ec-444834c9df73&amp;k=93697" rel="nofollow">http://www.tnr.com/columnists/story.html?id=ba9b09bb-ed01-4582-b6ec-444834c9df73&amp;k=93697</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s one. I&#8217;m going to bed now, but if you want the other one (the partitioned Iraq one), I&#8217;ll post it later.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109844</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109844</guid>
		<description>Jay (Tea), since I have never heard of those stories before, and you provided no links (whah whah, the big bad moderation monster is so mean to you), I&#039;m going to assume you&#039;re either exaggerating, or lying, or both. Probably both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay (Tea), since I have never heard of those stories before, and you provided no links (whah whah, the big bad moderation monster is so mean to you), I&#8217;m going to assume you&#8217;re either exaggerating, or lying, or both. Probably both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109843</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109843</guid>
		<description>Jay Tea, I often go &quot;over the top&quot; when discussing politics. I&#039;ve occasionally said that I&#039;d be happy to see every incumbent turned out and their opposites installed, too. But that is based on my disgust with the contribution-driven politics of today, as I&#039;m sure it is with you. I don&#039;t really mean it now that we control Congress, just as I&#039;m sure you wouldn&#039;t have really meant it in 2006. 
But if we win the election, control of Congress will be a non-issue. Barack&#039;s coattails, and the climate of the country, will ensure that. If, God forbid, we lose, I think we&#039;ll still pick up enough seats to make up for Biden&#039;s. And stymie any initiatives from a one-term President like Gramps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Tea, I often go &#8220;over the top&#8221; when discussing politics. I&#8217;ve occasionally said that I&#8217;d be happy to see every incumbent turned out and their opposites installed, too. But that is based on my disgust with the contribution-driven politics of today, as I&#8217;m sure it is with you. I don&#8217;t really mean it now that we control Congress, just as I&#8217;m sure you wouldn&#8217;t have really meant it in 2006.<br />
But if we win the election, control of Congress will be a non-issue. Barack&#8217;s coattails, and the climate of the country, will ensure that. If, God forbid, we lose, I think we&#8217;ll still pick up enough seats to make up for Biden&#8217;s. And stymie any initiatives from a one-term President like Gramps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109841</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109841</guid>
		<description>Bruce, I&#039;d heard something like that, didn&#039;t care much. And while you&#039;re technically correct about this November, I meant it across the board, all 100 of &#039;em. 

But does that number include McCain and Obama? Come next January, one or the other will be out of the Senate.

Presuming, of course, Hillary doesn&#039;t pull a coup at the convention, but that wouldn&#039;t change the numbers -- McCain, Obama, and Clinton are all not up for re-election, but Biden is.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, I&#8217;d heard something like that, didn&#8217;t care much. And while you&#8217;re technically correct about this November, I meant it across the board, all 100 of &#8216;em. </p>
<p>But does that number include McCain and Obama? Come next January, one or the other will be out of the Senate.</p>
<p>Presuming, of course, Hillary doesn&#8217;t pull a coup at the convention, but that wouldn&#8217;t change the numbers &#8212; McCain, Obama, and Clinton are all not up for re-election, but Biden is.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109840</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109840</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;d have no problem with every single incumbent of both parties being tossed out on their ass.&quot;
The only thing you&#039;ve ever written that I (mostly) agree with.
You do know the Republicans stand to lose 22 seats, the Dems 12, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d have no problem with every single incumbent of both parties being tossed out on their ass.&#8221;<br />
The only thing you&#8217;ve ever written that I (mostly) agree with.<br />
You do know the Republicans stand to lose 22 seats, the Dems 12, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109839</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109839</guid>
		<description>Thanks for proving my point, Zython.

Biden, October 2001: &quot;Let&#039;s give two hundred million dollars to Iran. No strings attached.&quot;

NPR article you cited: &quot;Iran may be able to develop a nuclear weapon between 2010 and 2015 — but the country halted its nuclear weapons development program in 2003 due to international pressure, according to a new National Intelligence Estimate report.&quot;

The &quot;non-existent program&quot; was apparently shut down two years after Biden&#039;s suggestion. 

Thanks, Zython!

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for proving my point, Zython.</p>
<p>Biden, October 2001: &#8220;Let&#8217;s give two hundred million dollars to Iran. No strings attached.&#8221;</p>
<p>NPR article you cited: &#8220;Iran may be able to develop a nuclear weapon between 2010 and 2015 — but the country halted its nuclear weapons development program in 2003 due to international pressure, according to a new National Intelligence Estimate report.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;non-existent program&#8221; was apparently shut down two years after Biden&#8217;s suggestion. </p>
<p>Thanks, Zython!</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109835</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109835</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Of which, I’m sure, not a single penny would have gone towards their nuclear program&lt;/i&gt;

You mean the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16846056&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;non-existent&lt;/A&gt; nuclear program? Gotcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Of which, I’m sure, not a single penny would have gone towards their nuclear program</i></p>
<p>You mean the <a HREF="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16846056" rel="nofollow">non-existent</a> nuclear program? Gotcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros Hussein 62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109834</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros Hussein 62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109834</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’m not sure how Joe Biden would lose Colorado, but like I said, Sen. Obama is only down 2 in CO.&lt;/i&gt;

Let&#039;s talk about &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; next Monday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m not sure how Joe Biden would lose Colorado, but like I said, Sen. Obama is only down 2 in CO.</i></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s talk about <b>that</b> next Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/23/its-biden/#comment-109833</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8688#comment-109833</guid>
		<description>Joe Biden&#039;s foreign policy credentials: 

Shortly after 9/11, when our economy was heading towards the crapper, he thought a good move to show we&#039;re not &quot;anti-Arab&quot; was to give -- no strings attached -- Iran $200,000,000.00 Of which, I&#039;m sure, not a single penny would have gone towards their nuclear program. (Note to Senator Biden: Iranians ain&#039;t Arabs.)

Back in 2006, he suggested partitioning Iraq along sectarian and religious lines. 

In his defense, he actually helped unify the then-fractious Iraqi government -- pretty much every single one of them was totally disgusted by the plan.

I dunno if &quot;I&#039;ll help unite the Iraqi government by giving them someone to disagree with&quot; was his intent, but it worked out pretty well...

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Biden&#8217;s foreign policy credentials: </p>
<p>Shortly after 9/11, when our economy was heading towards the crapper, he thought a good move to show we&#8217;re not &#8220;anti-Arab&#8221; was to give &#8212; no strings attached &#8212; Iran $200,000,000.00 Of which, I&#8217;m sure, not a single penny would have gone towards their nuclear program. (Note to Senator Biden: Iranians ain&#8217;t Arabs.)</p>
<p>Back in 2006, he suggested partitioning Iraq along sectarian and religious lines. </p>
<p>In his defense, he actually helped unify the then-fractious Iraqi government &#8212; pretty much every single one of them was totally disgusted by the plan.</p>
<p>I dunno if &#8220;I&#8217;ll help unite the Iraqi government by giving them someone to disagree with&#8221; was his intent, but it worked out pretty well&#8230;</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
