You made a vague, generalized, unsources, and unproven remark about the Obama campaign. I made a similar one to point out how ridiculous your was. By the way, you’ve checked each and every press release ever generated by the Obama campaign, and verified that all of them have specifically mentioned how old Johnathon Sidney McCain the Third is?

A similar Google search on Obama’s site turned up over 1300 results. Funny how you haven’t noted that in your eagerness to catapult propaganda for the Republican’ts…

* One of them is a blog commenter calling Obama & Pelosi traitors.
* One of them is a blog commenter calling Ted Kennedy a traitor.
* The other 94 are blog commenters calling McCain the traitor.

Any more “reality-based” accusations you’d like to throw out?

Is Obama going to release even ONE press release this election that doesn’t refer to McCain as “old”?

Is Johnathon Sidney McCain the Third going to release even ONE press release this election that doesn’t refer to Obama as “a traitor”?

Also: nice of you to whine about one campaign going negative on the other campaign’s candidate. While your own candidate is doing the exact same thing, except, like, more of it more consistently. Apparently Republican’t goggles alter perception more than beer goggles. Who knew?

So what you’re saying is that building a political platform off the idea that “young people are stupid” is fine, but old people aren’t fair game?

Do you not consider this “corrupt”? In your parlance, is this merely “enterprising”?

Really, the “Corrupt” Reed? Why not just refer to him as the “Running Dog Capitalist Pig”?

OW, the House Organ of Information for the Obama Secretariat….

You’ve really overplayed the old card.

No. Stop whining.

Just so I got this straight; it was a Senate probe launched by McCain that uncovered Reed’s connections, and he went ahead and fundraised with him anyway.

Dayum.

PS: Does Obama REALLY want to have a national discussion on financial backers?