<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New McCain Ad Has Effect&#8230; On McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/new-mccain-ad-has-effect-on-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/new-mccain-ad-has-effect-on-mccain/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: juhar19</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/new-mccain-ad-has-effect-on-mccain/#comment-108353</link>
		<dc:creator>juhar19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 01:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8486#comment-108353</guid>
		<description>Was this amateurish ad done on PowerPoint?  It wasn&#039;t coherent.  What was the point? It&#039;s ridiculous to try to portray all OBAMA supporters as groupies and teenage fan club members.  

People of all ages are thrilled to see him, women thinks he&#039;s attractive, and Obama supporters get excited to get his autograph so how does that make OBAMA a rock star (He doesn&#039;t sing, dance or play a musical instrument or release sex tapes).  How is he a rock star?  

Then the final sloppy insertion at the end - voice saying &quot;Hot Chicks dig OBAMA.&quot; and the bold typeface words &quot;He&#039;s Not Worthy.&quot;

How so untrue.  NBC&#039;s Smucker Birthdays had a 105 year old woman who said she has lived this long to cast her vote for Barack Obama.  Is she one of those &quot;Hot Chicks&quot; that dig OBAMA.  Please, this ad should get negative responds because it emphasizes McCain&#039;s stupidity and childish behavior and the final idiotic statement that John McCain approves this nonsensical ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this amateurish ad done on PowerPoint?  It wasn&#8217;t coherent.  What was the point? It&#8217;s ridiculous to try to portray all OBAMA supporters as groupies and teenage fan club members.  </p>
<p>People of all ages are thrilled to see him, women thinks he&#8217;s attractive, and Obama supporters get excited to get his autograph so how does that make OBAMA a rock star (He doesn&#8217;t sing, dance or play a musical instrument or release sex tapes).  How is he a rock star?  </p>
<p>Then the final sloppy insertion at the end &#8211; voice saying &#8220;Hot Chicks dig OBAMA.&#8221; and the bold typeface words &#8220;He&#8217;s Not Worthy.&#8221;</p>
<p>How so untrue.  NBC&#8217;s Smucker Birthdays had a 105 year old woman who said she has lived this long to cast her vote for Barack Obama.  Is she one of those &#8220;Hot Chicks&#8221; that dig OBAMA.  Please, this ad should get negative responds because it emphasizes McCain&#8217;s stupidity and childish behavior and the final idiotic statement that John McCain approves this nonsensical ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: durablend</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/new-mccain-ad-has-effect-on-mccain/#comment-108238</link>
		<dc:creator>durablend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8486#comment-108238</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the spiderwebs inside those internet tubes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the spiderwebs inside those internet tubes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/new-mccain-ad-has-effect-on-mccain/#comment-108184</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8486#comment-108184</guid>
		<description>What are these &quot;web sides&quot; you speak of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are these &#8220;web sides&#8221; you speak of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/new-mccain-ad-has-effect-on-mccain/#comment-108183</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8486#comment-108183</guid>
		<description>&quot;...and its affective! McCain wins&quot; 

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/affective

It does cause an emotion, but I&#039;m pretty sure McCain loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;and its affective! McCain wins&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/affective" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/affective</a></p>
<p>It does cause an emotion, but I&#8217;m pretty sure McCain loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jibreel Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/new-mccain-ad-has-effect-on-mccain/#comment-108178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jibreel Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8486#comment-108178</guid>
		<description>This is what I dont get. Sen Obama has web sides like the Huff Post, MoveOn and the daily(Kos)uckers doing Obama dirty work but McCain is on his own hitting back hard... and its affective!

McCain wins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I dont get. Sen Obama has web sides like the Huff Post, MoveOn and the daily(Kos)uckers doing Obama dirty work but McCain is on his own hitting back hard&#8230; and its affective!</p>
<p>McCain wins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

