<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:30:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108225</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108225</guid>
		<description>Hey, if Cindy&#039;s going to slather on the makeup like a trollop, then John must be entitled to treat her like one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if Cindy&#8217;s going to slather on the makeup like a trollop, then John must be entitled to treat her like one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108222</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108222</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Speaking of, did anybody else catch Hannity’s contention earlier this week that McCain’s capture and imprisonment entitled him to cheat on his wife?&lt;/i&gt;

Par for the course. Did it also permit McCain to cheat on his current wife too? Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Speaking of, did anybody else catch Hannity’s contention earlier this week that McCain’s capture and imprisonment entitled him to cheat on his wife?</i></p>
<p>Par for the course. Did it also permit McCain to cheat on his current wife too? Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108221</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108221</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Speaking of, did anybody else catch Hannity’s contention earlier this week that McCain’s capture and imprisonment entitled him to cheat on his wife?&lt;/i&gt;

Read it on newshounds. Sometimes I wonder if &lt;i&gt;he&lt;/i&gt; even believes what he&#039;s saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Speaking of, did anybody else catch Hannity’s contention earlier this week that McCain’s capture and imprisonment entitled him to cheat on his wife?</i></p>
<p>Read it on newshounds. Sometimes I wonder if <i>he</i> even believes what he&#8217;s saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108216</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108216</guid>
		<description>I agree about Clark (and would have voted for him for President, had he made it as far as the nomination in 2004), but got worried when Obama denounced Clark&#039;s perfectly sensible criticism of McCain earlier this year--that is, that McCain&#039;s getting shot down in Vietnam and being held captive for five years did not outright qualify him to lead.

Speaking of, did anybody else catch Hannity&#039;s contention earlier this week that McCain&#039;s capture and imprisonment entitled him to cheat on his wife?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about Clark (and would have voted for him for President, had he made it as far as the nomination in 2004), but got worried when Obama denounced Clark&#8217;s perfectly sensible criticism of McCain earlier this year&#8211;that is, that McCain&#8217;s getting shot down in Vietnam and being held captive for five years did not outright qualify him to lead.</p>
<p>Speaking of, did anybody else catch Hannity&#8217;s contention earlier this week that McCain&#8217;s capture and imprisonment entitled him to cheat on his wife?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108190</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108190</guid>
		<description>My top three go...

1) Richardson
2) Clark
3) Kaine

My bottom three go...

3, as in third-worst) Daschle
2) Bayh
1) Daschle again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My top three go&#8230;</p>
<p>1) Richardson<br />
2) Clark<br />
3) Kaine</p>
<p>My bottom three go&#8230;</p>
<p>3, as in third-worst) Daschle<br />
2) Bayh<br />
1) Daschle again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108169</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108169</guid>
		<description>You and me both, OWill. 

Let&#039;s see, the theme of my campaign is &quot;change.&quot; Hmmm....whom should I call? Tom Daschle! 

Clark, dammit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and me both, OWill. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, the theme of my campaign is &#8220;change.&#8221; Hmmm&#8230;.whom should I call? Tom Daschle! </p>
<p>Clark, dammit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108162</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108162</guid>
		<description>I think its highly unlikely its going to be Daschle. And if it was him, I might jump out of a window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its highly unlikely its going to be Daschle. And if it was him, I might jump out of a window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108159</guid>
		<description>Kos is already saying Biden is out:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/14/185633/744

He thinks it is going to be Tom Daschle. Daschle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kos is already saying Biden is out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/14/185633/744" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/14/185633/744</a></p>
<p>He thinks it is going to be Tom Daschle. Daschle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrGreyGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108153</link>
		<dc:creator>MrGreyGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108153</guid>
		<description>Biden&#039;s ego would never allow him to play second fiddle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biden&#8217;s ego would never allow him to play second fiddle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108141</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108141</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don’t see how he represents change any more than Biden does.&lt;/i&gt;

Biden&#039;s been in the Senate for a thousand years. He&#039;s an Inside the Beltway standard Meet the Press guest. Clark doesn&#039;t come from established political circles. 

Biden was also loud wrong on the Iraq Invasion, which really needs to count for something (since it&#039;s good policy and good politics--that&#039;s how Obama won the nomination in the first place). Clark got Iraq right. It would be nice to get on the same page there and hammer Bush/McCain with that. 

Personally, I can&#039;t stand Biden. I think he&#039;s a preening schmuck, eager to sway with the political winds du jour. He gets in some good one-liners, and is occasionally right, but on the whole, he nowhere close to Clark in terms of what each brings to the ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don’t see how he represents change any more than Biden does.</i></p>
<p>Biden&#8217;s been in the Senate for a thousand years. He&#8217;s an Inside the Beltway standard Meet the Press guest. Clark doesn&#8217;t come from established political circles. </p>
<p>Biden was also loud wrong on the Iraq Invasion, which really needs to count for something (since it&#8217;s good policy and good politics&#8211;that&#8217;s how Obama won the nomination in the first place). Clark got Iraq right. It would be nice to get on the same page there and hammer Bush/McCain with that. </p>
<p>Personally, I can&#8217;t stand Biden. I think he&#8217;s a preening schmuck, eager to sway with the political winds du jour. He gets in some good one-liners, and is occasionally right, but on the whole, he nowhere close to Clark in terms of what each brings to the ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108136</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108136</guid>
		<description>Biden&#039;s been my favorite pick pretty much since the beginning (at least, inasmuch as Richardson was unfortunately never a likely pick).  August pretty much summed up my reasoning back in March: http://www.someguywithawebsite.com/blogarchive/week_2008_03_23.html#002490

Ed makes a good point about Biden not really fitting the &quot;change&quot; meme, but another way to look at that is that he balances the &quot;lack of experience&quot; smear.  And while I like Clark and think he&#039;d be a great pick, I don&#039;t see how he represents change any more than Biden does.

Of course, what Clark DOES bring to the table is obvious: he&#039;s got better name recognition than Biden, has the foreign policy chops AND the military experience, and he&#039;s a friend of the Clintons.

I think either one would be a great pick.  Bayh would probably be the worst option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biden&#8217;s been my favorite pick pretty much since the beginning (at least, inasmuch as Richardson was unfortunately never a likely pick).  August pretty much summed up my reasoning back in March: <a href="http://www.someguywithawebsite.com/blogarchive/week_2008_03_23.html#002490" rel="nofollow">http://www.someguywithawebsite.com/blogarchive/week_2008_03_23.html#002490</a></p>
<p>Ed makes a good point about Biden not really fitting the &#8220;change&#8221; meme, but another way to look at that is that he balances the &#8220;lack of experience&#8221; smear.  And while I like Clark and think he&#8217;d be a great pick, I don&#8217;t see how he represents change any more than Biden does.</p>
<p>Of course, what Clark DOES bring to the table is obvious: he&#8217;s got better name recognition than Biden, has the foreign policy chops AND the military experience, and he&#8217;s a friend of the Clintons.</p>
<p>I think either one would be a great pick.  Bayh would probably be the worst option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Whale</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108134</link>
		<dc:creator>White Whale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108134</guid>
		<description>I am a huge Clark fan but I am alittle suprised that Richardson gets no mention. From a strategy standpoint, he fits into Obama&#039;s plan to take over the West, has foriegn policy chops and doesn&#039;t hog the spotlight. Evan Bayh would be the absolute worst pick because he is Republican-lite and has been promoting the war since the beggining. Hardly a change minded candidate. I think that Clark is the arrow that slays McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge Clark fan but I am alittle suprised that Richardson gets no mention. From a strategy standpoint, he fits into Obama&#8217;s plan to take over the West, has foriegn policy chops and doesn&#8217;t hog the spotlight. Evan Bayh would be the absolute worst pick because he is Republican-lite and has been promoting the war since the beggining. Hardly a change minded candidate. I think that Clark is the arrow that slays McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108131</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108131</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s pretty much no one else who would boost the ticket half as much as Clark (if he wants it). Brian Schweitzer is second, but not a close second. I dunno who&#039;s third, but he or she is a distant third to BSchweitz&#039;s distant second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s pretty much no one else who would boost the ticket half as much as Clark (if he wants it). Brian Schweitzer is second, but not a close second. I dunno who&#8217;s third, but he or she is a distant third to BSchweitz&#8217;s distant second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108129</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108129</guid>
		<description>I like Clark too but I don&#039;t see it happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Clark too but I don&#8217;t see it happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/14/joe/#comment-108124</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8484#comment-108124</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s about change. Biden is anything but change. 

Clark is he best pick. By far:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judah-freed/and-its-got-to-be-gen-wes_b_116812.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s about change. Biden is anything but change. </p>
<p>Clark is he best pick. By far:<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judah-freed/and-its-got-to-be-gen-wes_b_116812.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judah-freed/and-its-got-to-be-gen-wes_b_116812.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
