Comments on: David Freddoso’s “The Case Against Barack Obama”. Apparently He Thought Nobody Would Check.

By: PD100

PD100 — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:12:47 +0000

“I now understand why the liberal media worked so hard to keep the focus on Sarah Palin and off Obama and Biden”

Oh yeah, every day I turned on the teevee there was yet another story about John Mccain’s 3 Navy plane wrecks, adultery, the quashing of that DEA investigation into Cindy McCain’s charity, Keating Five.. IT WUZ ALL OVER CBS!! I never hurda’ no Bill Ayers or Reverend Wright, Nosirreee!!

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:05:19 +0000

Quite the infestation you got going here, Oliver.

By: Patti

Patti — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:14:36 +0000

I have read the book…too bad all you die-hard Democrats didn’t read it before you voted.
I now understand why the liberal media worked so hard to keep the focus on Sarah Palin and off Obama and Biden.

By: Kathy

Kathy — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:37:28 +0000

Oh please, quit debunking this book. Why can’t you face the facts on Obama and how radical this man really is.

By: Smiley

Smiley — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:35:09 +0000

I haven’t read the book, but I plan to pick it up tomorrow. I definitely feel that whether the writer is biased or not, he’s providing information that I am sure I can attempt to verify on my own. From the tons of reviews I’ve read tonight on various websites, it sounds like a very enlightening book for people on both sides of the election to read.

Just from reading here, I can’t believe the levels people stoop to just to argue about something they obviously know nothing about.

If you want to argue about something and claim you can provide evidence to support your stance…please provide unbiased evidence. Snopes.com is basically a BS website. Factcheck.org is biased as well.

If Obama is just another human, with admitted, known flaws, why does he need a group like Action Wire to ATTACK anyone publicly questioning him?

By: Christine

Christine — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:04:25 +0000

I like how a lot of people think they are experts who post comments here. People are so willing to demonize to come up with conspiracy theories. Not everyone who supports Obama thinks he is the second coming of Christ, and frankly I wish he was. I’m so sick of the barely veiled racism (somtimes not so veiled) mostly by people who can’t spell. I think one person up there posted in a comment that someone else should “shut up and go drink their kool-aid” hmmm…true colors shining through? Also, another person ranted about how they wish an uncorrupt “blue-collar” you know, sensible person just like themselves would be elected president. Sorry, not me. I frankly would be absolutely terrified to have someone average in this important, incredibly difficult job. Its another example of blacks being damned if they do damned if they don’t. Obama (and his wife) worked hard and achieved success, being educated at the top schools in the country having got there by not being handed it on a silver platter…yet he is an “elitist”. I just sense incredible bitterness from the average person who thinks they could “do a better job myself”. No one is perfect, everyone has character flaws but if Obama had serious character flaws they would already be exposed..oh I forgot they are not being exposed because of the vast liberal conspiracy. News flash: there is no liberal conspiracy…we don’t have one its just called common sense. See, I am going off on a tangent but the thing I absolutely LOVE about being a “corrupt Godless” liberal is that we DON’T CARE what others do socially as long as you don’t tread on our rights. You can go ahead and have different religious or social viewpoints from us. I feel that on the other hand the far right agenda is more based on fear than the liberal agenda…an incredible social fear that doesn’t exist. I just want to let all of you far far right social conservatives know that 1) you should get your facts from reputable sources not just biased ones. 2) If someone is stating their opinion its just that an opinion, and you should see it as such. Don’t demand an counterclaim or someone to cite sources back to you. Most people wouldn’t know off the top of their heads. Find out for yourself. Try to read and watch with an open unbiased mind stop looking desperately for the smoking gun. 3) Don’t worry if Obama has a secret agenda to turn us over to the Muslims or let Al Queda in to kill us all you will be fine..you are going to Heaven anyway…right?

By: kat in your hat

kat in your hat — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:00:22 +0000

Anything negative about Obama is a LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don’t question. EVER.

By: Micronot

Micronot — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:42:09 +0000

Although off topic, I tend to agree with the sentiments expressed by T3flon. Our founding fathers had the wisdom to create a government with 3 branches to ensure a balance of power. Unfortunately, we don’t have that same balance of power in politics as it is driven by a two party system. It seems to be that both sides are constantly pointing out the faults of the other side and in the battle we loose site of the fact that both sides are faulty! Too often I think people are stuck voting for the lesser of two evils rather than voting for a candidate that they truly back. I am sure many politicians start off running for office having the greatest of intentions, but after being run through the machine, once they make it to the top levels of government, I am not sure if there are any that haven’t lost touch with issues and addressing the best interests of the common American. BTW – Supporting big business can be in favor of the common American, because big business is what provides many of us common Americans the jobs that we need to support the life styles we so enjoy.

By: Smurph

Smurph — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:25:14 +0000

Um, your refutation was a bir short on facts. You accuse Freddoso of fabrications and dubious citations, yet you don’t provide any facts or citations of your own. You yourself really only said “It ain’t so” and that Media Matters said “It ain’t so”. How then can you stand on the intellectual and moral high ground and accuse Freddoso of being misleading?

By: TJ

TJ — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:49:28 +0000

Having read much of the snopes.com information on Obama, I continue to be left with one question.

Since when does snopes consider the source of the controversy as a valid measure of proving or disproving the controversy?

Much of what snopes says is proven false is proven so simply by Obama saying it’s not true.

That’s like snopes saying OJ Simplson didn’t kill his ex, simply because he said he didn’t.

I’m not saying they’re not correect. I’m simply saying that if they can’t provide any better source of information than Obama himself, then the jury is still out on the accuracy of the claims.

By: Vairy

Vairy — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:49:55 +0000

Factcheck.org has a conflict of interestis, they are owned by The Annenberg Foundation.

By: Jody

Jody — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:08:11 +0000

The facts HAVE been published, if one cared to look, instead of being sucked in by only the latest regurgitation of garbage. Obama is not the Messiah, never said he was. He admits he’s human, and flawed. I wish he and his campaign were above reproach in their representations; they’re not, but I think they’ve done a far better job of trying to raise the level of discourse, and were increasingly pulled toward the gutter by Clinton and McCain. If he doesn’t fight back, he’s a wimp; if he does, so much for “change.”

On Freddoso:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-k-wilson/david-freddosos-hatchet-j_b_118410.html
Yes, Huffpo is liberal, but you asked for refutation.

You’ll find criticism of Obama there, too. Doesn’t that make you want to take the trip?

And if you’re having difficulty sorting it out:
http://www.factcheck.org/just-the-facts/spam_alert_hit_delete.html

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:22:50 +0000

Here you go.

By: Grace

Grace — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:59:47 +0000

hi oliver!

just read mr. freddoso’s article, “obama played by chicago rules,” published in the wall street journal. just started to research on it but stumbled on your website.

you wrote, “The first few pages of David Freddoso’s book, The Case Against Barack Obama, are marked by false and misleading assertions about Sen. Barack Obama, accompanied by dubious citations.” may you please list what these and what the sources of your refuations are?

By: Im a political girl

Im a political girl — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:51:02 +0000

Right Oliver…quote Media Matters, a lefty organization. Now there’s a viable resource.

Read the book. Obama is nothing but a Chicago pol with dubious associations. He proposes nothing new, typical leftie mush: more government.

There’s a part of me that wants him to win, it will be fun to watch all your bubbles burst. The problem is, it will be too dangerous for the country.

By: t3flon

t3flon — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:28:53 +0000

how ridiculous when people are quick to spit out comments narrowmindedly. grow up people. how hard is it to read something and do a little research on your own to substantiate any claims, quotes, etc.?? i personally think obama is the anti-christ but that’s just me. why can’t we just have one american stand up and run for president…..someone straight from the blue collar pool who hasn’t been corrupted by politics and is willing to DO for the people and not the ‘power brokers’ run for president?
we the people are the ones who choose who we wish to lead us yet we’ve been programmed to believe that there are so many hoops to jump in order to ever try a run for the presidency….i.e., having to raise money to campaign and blah, blah. i know it takes money to campaign but if you don’t have the best interest of the higher powers then there goes any hopes of financial backing that’s required in order for you to have your voice heard!!
yet the candidates that we are force fed are the worst and we Americans have to swallow THAT pill. i’d stand up right now and announce my candidacy for president but go unheard even if i pulled out a bull horn and stood in front of the white house! i’d be willing to DO for the people.
oil crisis??? suspend all these money wasting programs that has the gov’t writing up expenditures of 10,000 dollars for a hammer, 3000 for a bucket, etc…. all this taxing and noboday truly knows where the moneys going. focus all that wasted money towards truly pushing for solving our energy/oil crisis and getting results that will make an impact NOW. not in 5 or 10 years. i can go on and on but i’m putting it all in my new book that i’m writing that’s titled, “why i should run for president”. it’ll blow your mind on how we the people can truly make a change if we all stood together united and DEMANDED change. you’ll want to vote for me after you read it. the book will be out REALLY soon. don’t be surprised if i wind up in front of congress petitioning to run for president at the last moment especially when i have the american public from east to west backing me. our voices will be heard!

By: L_C_Prestoni

L_C_Prestoni — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:15:26 +0000

Right! READ the book! Unplug from your Kool-aid vat and read the damn book!

Liberal or Conservative talking points don’t amount to a hill of beans when it comes to the direct substantiation of your take. I hate reading what robots write!

==READ THE BOOK, Morons!== Then comment!!!

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:38:55 +0000

Have any of you actually read the book or just perused someone else’s reviews? Just take a couple hours, it is remarkably easy to read and well edited. Even if you disagree, do the work yourself, it might be an academic thing but it probably hasn’t hurt anybody yet…unless you spit at integrity.

By: Not supporting

Not supporting — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:00:59 +0000

Your information is flawed. Obama only has five years of Congressional experience and the media marketing machine is trying to put him in office.

Vote with your mind not your heart.

By: TheQuail

TheQuail — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:39:55 +0000

It’s funny, Feddoso’s little intro to his book calls Obama “The Most Liberal Senator” while conveniently overlooking Bernie Sanders (the self-described socialist), Sherrod Brown (my Senator and who I wish would run for Pres., he’ll get things done), heck, even Hillary!

Anyway…

I will support Barack Obama in November over John McCain, despite Obama’s faults. To say that Obama is a racist and dangerous for being in Jeremiah Wright’s congregation is like saying John McCain is racist and dangerous for taking Barry Goldwater’s seat in the Senate. I don’t agree with my priest even 30% of the time (and the rest of that time is basically what Jesus said and helping the poor), but I still go to church. If you can truly judge a candidate by the company he keeps, if I were to run for office I’d be one heck of a conservative because I can count more conservative friends than liberal ones. Yet I’m still quite the liberaltarian.

When you vote for president, you need to consider what the president can actually DO. John McCain and every conservative pundit on God’s green earth asserts ad nauseam that Obama will “raise taxes.” The president has absolutely no authority to do that, only the House can levy taxes, and only the Senate can approve a budget for the use of said taxes. Sure, he can introduce the idea to Congress, but that would take too much time for what he’s actually itching to do. Oh yeah, and, if you want McCain’s responsible budget plans and domestic ideals, keep him in the Senate, where he can continue to debate and investigate these issues and vote for them. He sounds more like a majority/minority leader than a president. On the international front, I don’t think America can handle another Republican president. Bush’s actions and his one complete hole of an executive order (i.e. the War in Iraq) have left al-Qaeda not weaker, but they’ve grown over sixfold (SIX HUNDRED PERCENT) in membership and resources, and, on top of that, few in the world want to help us because of failed Republican diplomacy. We’ve made terrorism more dangerous by causing the creation of small faction groups, mostly wizzed off Iraqis and other Arabs who cannot believe that we would brutally invade for little purpose one of their sovereign nations. It’s time to leave international work to the internationalists. It’s time return to Clinton’s strong intelligence and anti-terrorist incentives, all of which were abolished when Bush took office and replaced with one committee that met *once* before 9/11. McCain cannot do it, or he’ll lose his isolationist base. Obama must, if he wishes to keep the support of internationalists, and internationalism is a key ingredient to modern American liberalism.

Besides, the nature of the campaign so far has not given me much hope for McCain’s leadership skills. He claimed that his negative campaign was catalyzed by Obama’s rejection of his incredibly slanted town-hall debates. (when actually Obama agreed, with conditions that wouldn’t make them a conservafest full of lobbed softballs for McCain and “Why do you like murdering babies?”-style questions for him.) John nobly wanted to break away from his predecessors and run a Karl Roveless campaign, focusing on the issues. But something as trivial as THAT caused him to throw that kind of conviction and value out the window? When Gordon Brown wants a summit held in Scotland instead of Florida is McCain going to nuke the British Isles? Meanwhile, Obama has shown himself to be a promising Teflon candidate, meaning like Reagan, he’ll be able to focus on his work even when his underlings screw up (or even when he screws up).

Bottom line, McCain’s values are shaky, Obama’s values are shaky. However, Obama’s shaky values don’t get in the way of his ideas and the issues. We need change NOT ON THE DOMESTIC FRONT but we need DESPERATE change on the international front, and another Republican president cannot offer that, even if he were Ron Paul. Thank you.