<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meet The Press: No Liberals Allowed (Again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:00:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-107085</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-107085</guid>
		<description>Tom, I don&#039;t recall ever using that phrase, let alone on you. My phrasing runs more toward &quot;man, what the hell are you smoking, and are you willing to share?&quot;

I think you&#039;ve got me confused with Jay non-Tea. 

In which case, you REALLY need to lay off the crack.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I don&#8217;t recall ever using that phrase, let alone on you. My phrasing runs more toward &#8220;man, what the hell are you smoking, and are you willing to share?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve got me confused with Jay non-Tea. </p>
<p>In which case, you REALLY need to lay off the crack.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (: Tom :)</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-107066</link>
		<dc:creator>(: Tom :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-107066</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Jay Tea, Aug 3rd, 2008 at 8:05 pm&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Repack, Lieberman is very much a liberal.&lt;/i&gt;

As you were quick to inform me:  put down the crack pipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Jay Tea, Aug 3rd, 2008 at 8:05 pm</i></p>
<p><i>Repack, Lieberman is very much a liberal.</i></p>
<p>As you were quick to inform me:  put down the crack pipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-107015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-107015</guid>
		<description>Quaker, Air America benefited from the illegal loans, and took over a year to repay them after their illegal nature was exposed. If you&#039;ve got a better term to describe that kind of conduct, I&#039;d be interested in hearing it.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker, Air America benefited from the illegal loans, and took over a year to repay them after their illegal nature was exposed. If you&#8217;ve got a better term to describe that kind of conduct, I&#8217;d be interested in hearing it.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-107014</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-107014</guid>
		<description>&quot;Stole the money&quot; was more than a &quot;bit of an exaggeration,&quot; because it tarred all the people who work for AA, not just Mr. Cohen, the only person who seems to be responsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Stole the money&#8221; was more than a &#8220;bit of an exaggeration,&#8221; because it tarred all the people who work for AA, not just Mr. Cohen, the only person who seems to be responsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-107012</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-107012</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Perhaps “stole the money” was a bit of an exaggeration, but it was a hell of a lot shorter than typing “the chairman of Progressive Media, the company formed to own Air America, who was also on the board of a city-funded non-profit, arranged for that non-profit to make an $875,000 interest-free loan to Air America, a for-profit entity, in violation of city, state, and federal laws. And though the illegal ‘loan’ was exposed in July 2005, Air America didn’t repay it until September 2006.”

There, happy now, Quaker??&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just shorthand...with the added benefit of being defamatory toward people who never had anything to do with the loan (but you don&#039;t like them anyway).

The chairman of Progressive Media, who dumped Air America on new owners without informing them of the loan. And the new owners who repaid the loan even though they had no legal obligation to do so.

Sure, Mr. Tea. That&#039;s how &quot;ripoffs&quot; always work out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Perhaps “stole the money” was a bit of an exaggeration, but it was a hell of a lot shorter than typing “the chairman of Progressive Media, the company formed to own Air America, who was also on the board of a city-funded non-profit, arranged for that non-profit to make an $875,000 interest-free loan to Air America, a for-profit entity, in violation of city, state, and federal laws. And though the illegal ‘loan’ was exposed in July 2005, Air America didn’t repay it until September 2006.”</p>
<p>There, happy now, Quaker??</p></blockquote>
<p>Just shorthand&#8230;with the added benefit of being defamatory toward people who never had anything to do with the loan (but you don&#8217;t like them anyway).</p>
<p>The chairman of Progressive Media, who dumped Air America on new owners without informing them of the loan. And the new owners who repaid the loan even though they had no legal obligation to do so.</p>
<p>Sure, Mr. Tea. That&#8217;s how &#8220;ripoffs&#8221; always work out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-107005</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-107005</guid>
		<description>well if u know of another media watchdog who has quantified MTP guests feel free to cite them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well if u know of another media watchdog who has quantified MTP guests feel free to cite them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106997</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106997</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disemvowel&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;That explains&lt;/a&gt; a hell of a lot of gibberish comments I&#039;ve read in my months of blog-reading...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disemvowel" rel="nofollow">That explains</a> a hell of a lot of gibberish comments I&#8217;ve read in my months of blog-reading&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106995</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106995</guid>
		<description>PT, it&#039;s most often called &quot;disemvowelling&quot; and we have it at Wizbang. We use it very rarely, but it is quite handy. 

Oliver, I dunno if it&#039;s a plugin or just some commands, but if you like, I can tell you the commands we use to activate it.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PT, it&#8217;s most often called &#8220;disemvowelling&#8221; and we have it at Wizbang. We use it very rarely, but it is quite handy. </p>
<p>Oliver, I dunno if it&#8217;s a plugin or just some commands, but if you like, I can tell you the commands we use to activate it.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTCruiser</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106985</link>
		<dc:creator>PTCruiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106985</guid>
		<description>Oliver,

You should ask P6 to share his devoweling software program with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver,</p>
<p>You should ask P6 to share his devoweling software program with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106977</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106977</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;what happened to the guy who was enough of a good Democrat to be Al Gore’s running mate in 2000?&lt;/i&gt;

I never thought that was a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>what happened to the guy who was enough of a good Democrat to be Al Gore’s running mate in 2000?</i></p>
<p>I never thought that was a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106973</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106973</guid>
		<description>Quaker, a bit of a quibble:

1) Lieberman is not, as I understand it, a member of the Democratic party. He caucuses with them and votes with them most of the time, but he is not a member of that party.

2) As I noted before, Lieberman takes the progressive side on most issues. So for most things, he is a reliable voice for the progressive cause.

3) I suspect a good chunk of conservatives&#039; admiration for Lieberman is based not on his stand on issues (as noted, he opposes the conservative side most of the time), but &lt;b&gt;it&#039;s guaranteed to piss off the Democratic leadership and the nutroots.&lt;/b&gt; Lieberman, like Zell Miller, is a classic liberal, an old-school Democrat, a leftover from the days when you could respect your opponents, even like them. (Ronald Reagan and Tip O&#039;Neill were great buddies after hours.) 

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker, a bit of a quibble:</p>
<p>1) Lieberman is not, as I understand it, a member of the Democratic party. He caucuses with them and votes with them most of the time, but he is not a member of that party.</p>
<p>2) As I noted before, Lieberman takes the progressive side on most issues. So for most things, he is a reliable voice for the progressive cause.</p>
<p>3) I suspect a good chunk of conservatives&#8217; admiration for Lieberman is based not on his stand on issues (as noted, he opposes the conservative side most of the time), but <b>it&#8217;s guaranteed to piss off the Democratic leadership and the nutroots.</b> Lieberman, like Zell Miller, is a classic liberal, an old-school Democrat, a leftover from the days when you could respect your opponents, even like them. (Ronald Reagan and Tip O&#8217;Neill were great buddies after hours.) </p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Quaker</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106970</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Quaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106970</guid>
		<description>I would put it a bit differently, Farris:

If you&#039;re a member (albeit in in poor standing) of the Democratic Party, but are actively supporting the Republican candidate for President and are being courted to speak at the Republican convention, then you &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t get to be counted as a spokesman for the Democratic party of progressive principles on a talk show.&lt;/i&gt;

If you can point to a time when John McCain was publicly supporting a Democratic candidate - for any office - over the Republican candidate, then I&#039;ll grant you those the appropriate fraction of those &quot;875&quot; appearances. Which I suspect will be a big fat 0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would put it a bit differently, Farris:</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a member (albeit in in poor standing) of the Democratic Party, but are actively supporting the Republican candidate for President and are being courted to speak at the Republican convention, then you <i>don&#8217;t get to be counted as a spokesman for the Democratic party of progressive principles on a talk show.</i></p>
<p>If you can point to a time when John McCain was publicly supporting a Democratic candidate &#8211; for any office &#8211; over the Republican candidate, then I&#8217;ll grant you those the appropriate fraction of those &#8220;875&#8243; appearances. Which I suspect will be a big fat 0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106962</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106962</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comedycentral.com/colbertreport/videos.jhtml?videoId=177956&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Thanks buma!&lt;/a&gt;.  Even if he spelled it wrong...

I love Oliver&#039;s reasoning: if you&#039;re a liberal but you&#039;re there in opposition to other liberals, you count as a conservative.  If you&#039;re a conservative, but you&#039;re there in opposition to other conservatives (like all 875 John McCain appearances over the last 8 years), you count as ... a conservative!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/colbertreport/videos.jhtml?videoId=177956" rel="nofollow">Thanks buma!</a>.  Even if he spelled it wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>I love Oliver&#8217;s reasoning: if you&#8217;re a liberal but you&#8217;re there in opposition to other liberals, you count as a conservative.  If you&#8217;re a conservative, but you&#8217;re there in opposition to other conservatives (like all 875 John McCain appearances over the last 8 years), you count as &#8230; a conservative!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106953</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106953</guid>
		<description>Damn... double posting. My apologies.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn&#8230; double posting. My apologies.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106952</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106952</guid>
		<description>Good point, Oliver. I think I&#039;ll take this opportunity to disclose all the conference calls I&#039;ve been on, all the grants and subsidies I&#039;ve gotten from right-wing foundations and organizations, and personal financial gains I&#039;ve made because of the causes I&#039;ve espoused and denounced:

...

Well, I certainly feel better.

Oliver, at 3:06 you supported your position on how terribly biased Meet The Press is by... linking to Media Matters. So it&#039;s all right for you to cite them to bolster your position, but I can&#039;t refer to them to support mine?

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Oliver. I think I&#8217;ll take this opportunity to disclose all the conference calls I&#8217;ve been on, all the grants and subsidies I&#8217;ve gotten from right-wing foundations and organizations, and personal financial gains I&#8217;ve made because of the causes I&#8217;ve espoused and denounced:</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Well, I certainly feel better.</p>
<p>Oliver, at 3:06 you supported your position on how terribly biased Meet The Press is by&#8230; linking to Media Matters. So it&#8217;s all right for you to cite them to bolster your position, but I can&#8217;t refer to them to support mine?</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106948</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 07:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106948</guid>
		<description>Oliver, at 3:06 you cited a Media Matters report to back up your assertion that Meet The Press is conservatively biased. I&#039;m not allowed to cite them to back up my claims? 

But that does prompt me -- I think I&#039;ll take the opportunity here to disclose all my business affiliations, grants, paychecks, conference calls, favors, and all other compensation I&#039;ve received for endorsing the positions I&#039;ve held, and attacking those I disagreed witH:

...

Wow, that was cleansing. I feel so much better with that burden off my chest.

And Quaker, sorry I used shorthand. But it&#039;s a matter of record that the Gloria Wise Boys And Girls Club, a tax-exempt non-profit that got a lot of its money from the city of New York, loaned Progress Media, the owner of Air America, $875 million interest-free. The loan was authorized by Evan Cohen, Progress Media&#039;s chairman, who was at the same time Gloria Wise&#039;s Director of Development. This was so illegal that Wise was stripped of its non-profit status and its right to the &quot;Boys And Girls Club&quot; name, and triggered a criminal investigation that resulted in the fugitive Cohen being arrested in Guam. 

Perhaps &quot;stole the money&quot; was a bit of an exaggeration, but it was a hell of a lot shorter than typing &quot;the chairman of Progressive Media, the company formed to own Air America, who was also on the board of a city-funded non-profit, arranged for that non-profit to make an $875,000 interest-free loan to Air America, a for-profit entity, in violation of city, state, and federal laws. And though the illegal &#039;loan&#039; was exposed in July 2005, Air America didn&#039;t repay it until September 2006.&quot;

There, happy now, Quaker?

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver, at 3:06 you cited a Media Matters report to back up your assertion that Meet The Press is conservatively biased. I&#8217;m not allowed to cite them to back up my claims? </p>
<p>But that does prompt me &#8212; I think I&#8217;ll take the opportunity here to disclose all my business affiliations, grants, paychecks, conference calls, favors, and all other compensation I&#8217;ve received for endorsing the positions I&#8217;ve held, and attacking those I disagreed witH:</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Wow, that was cleansing. I feel so much better with that burden off my chest.</p>
<p>And Quaker, sorry I used shorthand. But it&#8217;s a matter of record that the Gloria Wise Boys And Girls Club, a tax-exempt non-profit that got a lot of its money from the city of New York, loaned Progress Media, the owner of Air America, $875 million interest-free. The loan was authorized by Evan Cohen, Progress Media&#8217;s chairman, who was at the same time Gloria Wise&#8217;s Director of Development. This was so illegal that Wise was stripped of its non-profit status and its right to the &#8220;Boys And Girls Club&#8221; name, and triggered a criminal investigation that resulted in the fugitive Cohen being arrested in Guam. </p>
<p>Perhaps &#8220;stole the money&#8221; was a bit of an exaggeration, but it was a hell of a lot shorter than typing &#8220;the chairman of Progressive Media, the company formed to own Air America, who was also on the board of a city-funded non-profit, arranged for that non-profit to make an $875,000 interest-free loan to Air America, a for-profit entity, in violation of city, state, and federal laws. And though the illegal &#8216;loan&#8217; was exposed in July 2005, Air America didn&#8217;t repay it until September 2006.&#8221;</p>
<p>There, happy now, Quaker?</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106944</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106944</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Air America (if you’ve never heard of them, I’m not surprised — they’re a liberal talk radio network) had to rip off a New York City Boys and Girls Club to keep paying its bills.&lt;/em&gt;

You know, all that blather about &quot;principles&quot; kinda loses its bite when you toss in cheap lies like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Air America (if you’ve never heard of them, I’m not surprised — they’re a liberal talk radio network) had to rip off a New York City Boys and Girls Club to keep paying its bills.</em></p>
<p>You know, all that blather about &#8220;principles&#8221; kinda loses its bite when you toss in cheap lies like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106943</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106943</guid>
		<description>OT, but I thought somebody should point out that one of our wingnuts was actually featured on The Colbert Report this past Wednesday, when &#039;The Word&#039; segment was about none other than ----

Save Ferris. 

I kid you not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT, but I thought somebody should point out that one of our wingnuts was actually featured on The Colbert Report this past Wednesday, when &#8216;The Word&#8217; segment was about none other than &#8212;-</p>
<p>Save Ferris. </p>
<p>I kid you not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106934</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106934</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Repack, Lieberman is very much a liberal.&lt;/i&gt;

What are you smoking? It&#039;s a lot better than the crap I get.

&lt;i&gt;what happened to the guy who was enough of a good Democrat to be Al Gore’s running mate in 2000?&lt;/i&gt;

Liberals have been asking that question since 2003, when he went seriously off the rails.  He lost a Democratic primary in 2006, and needed Republican votes to retain his seat.  Now he is being seriously considered as a speaker at the GOP convention, because as everyone knows, they like liberal speakers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Repack, Lieberman is very much a liberal.</i></p>
<p>What are you smoking? It&#8217;s a lot better than the crap I get.</p>
<p><i>what happened to the guy who was enough of a good Democrat to be Al Gore’s running mate in 2000?</i></p>
<p>Liberals have been asking that question since 2003, when he went seriously off the rails.  He lost a Democratic primary in 2006, and needed Republican votes to retain his seat.  Now he is being seriously considered as a speaker at the GOP convention, because as everyone knows, they like liberal speakers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/08/03/meet-the-press-no-liberals-allowed-again/#comment-106931</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 02:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=8304#comment-106931</guid>
		<description>BTW, was Joe Lieberman on MTP as an advocate of liberal causes? No, he was on as a chief surrogate of John McCain, who last time I checked was the Republican candidate for the presidency. On a variety of issues, Lieberman argued the conservative position in opposition to Obama surrogate John Kerry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, was Joe Lieberman on MTP as an advocate of liberal causes? No, he was on as a chief surrogate of John McCain, who last time I checked was the Republican candidate for the presidency. On a variety of issues, Lieberman argued the conservative position in opposition to Obama surrogate John Kerry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
