<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You S******* Me?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106424</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106424</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The problem with conservatives and government is that the cons rarely have the basic, minimum qualifications.&lt;/i&gt;

Did I hear correctly a couple of weeks ago that Bush&#039;s new deputy Chief of Staff is Not-Jenna&#039;s ex-boyfriend whose last job was carrying Bush&#039;s coat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The problem with conservatives and government is that the cons rarely have the basic, minimum qualifications.</i></p>
<p>Did I hear correctly a couple of weeks ago that Bush&#8217;s new deputy Chief of Staff is Not-Jenna&#8217;s ex-boyfriend whose last job was carrying Bush&#8217;s coat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106308</link>
		<dc:creator>Mold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106308</guid>
		<description>The problem with conservatives and government is that the cons rarely have the basic, minimum qualifications.  Those that do tend to fulfill the requirements of the position withou regard to political affiliation.  

Obama&#039;s Civil Service will have to remove these cancerous specks to prevent metastasis.  Should be pretty easy.  Most of the moles have no credentials or invalid work histories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with conservatives and government is that the cons rarely have the basic, minimum qualifications.  Those that do tend to fulfill the requirements of the position withou regard to political affiliation.  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s Civil Service will have to remove these cancerous specks to prevent metastasis.  Should be pretty easy.  Most of the moles have no credentials or invalid work histories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106299</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106299</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m sure the state department, which I have read is predominately staffed by &lt;i&gt;experienced foreign service professionals who report to a political hack with zero credentials&lt;/i&gt;, has had a hell of an eight years.&quot;

Fixed it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m sure the state department, which I have read is predominately staffed by <i>experienced foreign service professionals who report to a political hack with zero credentials</i>, has had a hell of an eight years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fixed it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106269</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106269</guid>
		<description>An interesting thing about this to me is that the professionals are very often disgusted by the policies of the cabinet member in charge of their department. Some, if in somewhat far-flung departments, exercise every inch of their autonomy in undermining their boss&#039;s ideas. I&#039;m sure the state department, which I have read is predominately staffed by liberals, has had a hell of an eight years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting thing about this to me is that the professionals are very often disgusted by the policies of the cabinet member in charge of their department. Some, if in somewhat far-flung departments, exercise every inch of their autonomy in undermining their boss&#8217;s ideas. I&#8217;m sure the state department, which I have read is predominately staffed by liberals, has had a hell of an eight years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calling all toasters</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106261</link>
		<dc:creator>calling all toasters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106261</guid>
		<description>I guess we have found a government policy Republicans like:  lawbreaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we have found a government policy Republicans like:  lawbreaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caged Lion</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106254</link>
		<dc:creator>Caged Lion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106254</guid>
		<description>&quot;I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that liberals don’t like: Political Affiliation.&quot;


No, this particular brand of affirmative action has been going on since the founding of the republic, and is exactly my fervor for AA for women and minorities will not wane. 

The only difference in this case is that under the unparalleled hubris of the last republican apex, many conservatives stopped being hush-hush and discreet about their normal practices. I guess it helps to have the DOJ in your pocket: no fear of being sued for discrimination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that liberals don’t like: Political Affiliation.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, this particular brand of affirmative action has been going on since the founding of the republic, and is exactly my fervor for AA for women and minorities will not wane. </p>
<p>The only difference in this case is that under the unparalleled hubris of the last republican apex, many conservatives stopped being hush-hush and discreet about their normal practices. I guess it helps to have the DOJ in your pocket: no fear of being sued for discrimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (: Tom :)</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106240</link>
		<dc:creator>(: Tom :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106240</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Phil, Jul 28th, 2008 at 8:42 pm&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that liberals don’t like: Political Affiliation.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;If it doesn’t effect a sub-group your party can mine votes from, you don’t like it. How typical.&lt;/i&gt;

[rhetorical]

I wonder if you would be saying the same thing if it was a Democratic adminsitration that was conducting these, um, &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;illegal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; job questionnaires, and all of the appointees, both career and political, were vetted to determine whether they were fervent enough followers of Obama to be employed by the federal government?

[/rhetorical] - because I&#039;m relatively certain what a Republican&#039;t Putsch fellator would have to say on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Phil, Jul 28th, 2008 at 8:42 pm</i></p>
<p><i>I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that liberals don’t like: Political Affiliation.</i></p>
<p><i>If it doesn’t effect a sub-group your party can mine votes from, you don’t like it. How typical.</i></p>
<p>[rhetorical]</p>
<p>I wonder if you would be saying the same thing if it was a Democratic adminsitration that was conducting these, um, <b><i>illegal</i></b> job questionnaires, and all of the appointees, both career and political, were vetted to determine whether they were fervent enough followers of Obama to be employed by the federal government?</p>
<p>[/rhetorical] &#8211; because I&#8217;m relatively certain what a Republican&#8217;t Putsch fellator would have to say on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphael</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106219</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106219</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t mind, say, a 10 percent or 20 percent minimum quota for conservatives in government jobs- fairness, prevention of the bad effects of echo chambers, and so on. What&#039;s wrong about this is that they apparently used a 100 percent minimum quota. Not to mention that noone in the US government is supposed to serve George W. Bush, or any other individual politician.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind, say, a 10 percent or 20 percent minimum quota for conservatives in government jobs- fairness, prevention of the bad effects of echo chambers, and so on. What&#8217;s wrong about this is that they apparently used a 100 percent minimum quota. Not to mention that noone in the US government is supposed to serve George W. Bush, or any other individual politician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106214</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106214</guid>
		<description>“Why are you a Republican?”

I ask Republicans this question on a regular basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Why are you a Republican?”</p>
<p>I ask Republicans this question on a regular basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106210</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106210</guid>
		<description>&quot;I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that liberals don&#039;t like: Political Affiliation&quot;.

I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that conservatives like: Political Affiliation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that liberals don&#8217;t like: Political Affiliation&#8221;.</p>
<p>I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that conservatives like: Political Affiliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106203</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106203</guid>
		<description>Phil, were conservatives having oh so much trouble finding career government jobs they were qualified for--and watching much lesser qualified liberals get those jobs--that they needed any sort of affirmative action policy to level the playing field? Is that a statement you&#039;re prepared to back up with more than haughty half-jokes?

Even Goodling knows she crossed a line. People got turned down and blacklisted because they &lt;i&gt;married&lt;/i&gt; a registered Democrat. They got fired and blocked from other jobs because Goodling &lt;i&gt;thought&lt;/i&gt; they might be gay.

This was a gross abuse of power and she&#039;s been called out on it. Go peddle your crazy elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, were conservatives having oh so much trouble finding career government jobs they were qualified for&#8211;and watching much lesser qualified liberals get those jobs&#8211;that they needed any sort of affirmative action policy to level the playing field? Is that a statement you&#8217;re prepared to back up with more than haughty half-jokes?</p>
<p>Even Goodling knows she crossed a line. People got turned down and blacklisted because they <i>married</i> a registered Democrat. They got fired and blocked from other jobs because Goodling <i>thought</i> they might be gay.</p>
<p>This was a gross abuse of power and she&#8217;s been called out on it. Go peddle your crazy elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106199</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106199</guid>
		<description>I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that liberals don&#039;t like: Political Affiliation.

If it doesn&#039;t effect a sub-group your party can mine votes from, you don&#039;t like it. How typical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we have finally discovered an Affirmative Action policy that liberals don&#8217;t like: Political Affiliation.</p>
<p>If it doesn&#8217;t effect a sub-group your party can mine votes from, you don&#8217;t like it. How typical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James E. Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106126</link>
		<dc:creator>James E. Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106126</guid>
		<description>Republicans have conducted business in this manner for years.  

The behavior revealed in this situation is only exceptional because it is so blatant, but I put that down to two things.  

First, the stupidity of the Bush/Cheney class of political hacks. From the DoJ to FEMA to every single department involved in the invasion/occupation of Iraq, the constants are people who are utterly unqualified and stunningly clueless.  I don&#039;t get it.  Maybe the people who have qualifications and brains all went to work on the donee side of this singularly corrupt administration.

Second, there has never been any accountability for the Bush/Cheney administration.  Not even when their hacks stole the election.  By the time Goodling went to work, the idea that any of them might ever be held accountable for their conduct didn&#039;t enter their minds.

Obama, like Pelosi and Reid before him, has sworn off doing anything  to hold anyone in the Bush&amp;Co administration accountable.  It will be years before the American people even find out what exactly happened in the last eight years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans have conducted business in this manner for years.  </p>
<p>The behavior revealed in this situation is only exceptional because it is so blatant, but I put that down to two things.  </p>
<p>First, the stupidity of the Bush/Cheney class of political hacks. From the DoJ to FEMA to every single department involved in the invasion/occupation of Iraq, the constants are people who are utterly unqualified and stunningly clueless.  I don&#8217;t get it.  Maybe the people who have qualifications and brains all went to work on the donee side of this singularly corrupt administration.</p>
<p>Second, there has never been any accountability for the Bush/Cheney administration.  Not even when their hacks stole the election.  By the time Goodling went to work, the idea that any of them might ever be held accountable for their conduct didn&#8217;t enter their minds.</p>
<p>Obama, like Pelosi and Reid before him, has sworn off doing anything  to hold anyone in the Bush&amp;Co administration accountable.  It will be years before the American people even find out what exactly happened in the last eight years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rheinhard</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106105</link>
		<dc:creator>Rheinhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106105</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10058.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My personal favorite&lt;/a&gt;:  Asking applicants who their favorite President, SCOTUS Justice or Legislator is (again to try and tease out the applicant&#039;s political leanings), and turning up her nose when one responded &quot;Condoleeza Rice&quot;.  Why?  Well Condi is known to be too &quot;pro-choice&quot; for this highly talented Pat Robertson Clown College grad!

I agree with Bradrocket: &quot;Upon becoming president, Hussein Obama X’s very first act — after freeing Mumia, signing a reparations bill and implementing Sharia law, of course — should be to oust every single unqualified hack that Bush hired right out of Regent University and banish them from ever working again in any job. &quot;

We seriously are going to need a good solid Stalinist purge of every party-over-country hack Bush has hired and planted like sabotage devices throughout the government, and damn the torpedoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10058.html" rel="nofollow">My personal favorite</a>:  Asking applicants who their favorite President, SCOTUS Justice or Legislator is (again to try and tease out the applicant&#8217;s political leanings), and turning up her nose when one responded &#8220;Condoleeza Rice&#8221;.  Why?  Well Condi is known to be too &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; for this highly talented Pat Robertson Clown College grad!</p>
<p>I agree with Bradrocket: &#8220;Upon becoming president, Hussein Obama X’s very first act — after freeing Mumia, signing a reparations bill and implementing Sharia law, of course — should be to oust every single unqualified hack that Bush hired right out of Regent University and banish them from ever working again in any job. &#8221;</p>
<p>We seriously are going to need a good solid Stalinist purge of every party-over-country hack Bush has hired and planted like sabotage devices throughout the government, and damn the torpedoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106097</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106097</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In sum, the evidence showed that Sampson, Williams, and Goodling violated federal law&lt;/blockquote&gt;
To which Mukasey replies: &lt;blockquote&gt;it is neither permissible nor acceptable to consider political affiliations in the hiring of career Department employees. And I have acted, and will continue to act, to ensure that my words are translated into reality so that the conduct described in this report does not occur again at the Department.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Oh, goody.  I guess that means we the DOJ is already preparing the indictments and will be arresting Sampson, Williams, and Goodling any moment now.

Any moment now.

Any...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In sum, the evidence showed that Sampson, Williams, and Goodling violated federal law</p></blockquote>
<p>To which Mukasey replies:<br />
<blockquote>it is neither permissible nor acceptable to consider political affiliations in the hiring of career Department employees. And I have acted, and will continue to act, to ensure that my words are translated into reality so that the conduct described in this report does not occur again at the Department.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, goody.  I guess that means we the DOJ is already preparing the indictments and will be arresting Sampson, Williams, and Goodling any moment now.</p>
<p>Any moment now.</p>
<p>Any&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106092</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/07/28/are-you-s-me/#comment-106092</guid>
		<description>Better still is &quot;[W]hat is it about George W. Bush that makes you want to serve him?&quot; and the whole attitude it shows.  The government isn&#039;t there to serve the public.  It is there to serve GWB.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_oath#Text_of_the_oaths&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Loyalty oaths, anyone?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better still is &#8220;[W]hat is it about George W. Bush that makes you want to serve him?&#8221; and the whole attitude it shows.  The government isn&#8217;t there to serve the public.  It is there to serve GWB.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_oath#Text_of_the_oaths" rel="nofollow">Loyalty oaths, anyone?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

