Breaking News
Oprah Quitting TV Show In 2011
Mitt Romney Is The Leader In McCain’s Veepstakes?
June 30th, 2008
9 Comments
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Oh please, oh please, oh please, oh please, oh please!
Mitt would help McCain with the business Republicans, but he sure wouldn’t help with the evangelicals who already think McCain is too moderate:
http://www.bleedingheartland.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1625
LOL. I’m looking forward to yet another national debate on magic underwear.
I was pretty sure Obama v. McCain was going to be another close one. But man, the guy’s an idiot if he picks Romney. His campaign seems to be falling apart before it even started.
I have never been in such complete agreement with CSS.
Jaim, it fell apart last September.
Can you picture a McNovocain-Romney v. Obama-Clark contest?
Ooh, the VP debates would be shaudenfruad-licious.
“Oh please, oh please, oh please, oh please, oh please!”
my sentiments exactly!
You could add both IQs and just crack a hundred.
It appears that it’s all down to Alaska Gov Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney, and team Romney fears Palin now has the best shot, so Romney camp is mounting a blogosphere-wide assault via Politico.
The tip-off that Politico is just a “promote Romney” piece is that it mentions EVERY NAME in the next two tiers of Veep prospects EXCEPT SARAH PALIN!!! — even names far more unlikely than Palin (since Romney camp knows Palin is the ONLY ONE who tops — I’ll say tops by far — Romney as McCain’s best pick).
Bottom line, Romney and Politico fear Palin most — as do the Dems and the MSM. (By the way, the Dems and MSM do not fear Romney the most — which says a lot.)
AOL, a main on-line pro-Obama/pro-Dem player, is now carrying the Politico piece promoting Romney buzz.
Clearly AOL wants McCain and the GOP to lose the general elction — hence they gladly promote Romney (no mention of Palin).
Also, CNN had Romney — kind of out of the blue — attacking Obama. Again, CNN, wanting McCain and the GOP to lose, gladly promotes Romney (to attempt to avert the Palin threat).
All the media frenzy which will surround the remarkable Palin “story” — essentially free to McCain — will be worth millions and millions of dollars of coverage and PR (more money than Romney would provide anyway).
Since the ecomony and high gas prices top the list of concerns of so many Americans why would common sense not dictate a VP on the national ticket who has the most education, understanding, and experience on how the economy works and by his success proven his expertise especially when McCain has admitted he is lacking in that area.
It is disgusting to me that Romney is viciously attacked for his changing his position on abortion, etc. when every politician has flip-flopped as much or more. (Those people attacking probably change their minds frequently.) Obama has flip-flopped on public funding, etc, etc. We lived in Arizona when McCain first ran and he sings a totally differemt song now. Also a person who never changes his position must never increase in comprehension of facts. The evidence of growth and maturity is the ability to change one’s mind when understanding is expanded. “He who never changes his opinions or corrects his mistakes is no wiser on the morrow than he is today.” The fact that Bush has been attacked for years for never changing his stance shows that some complain if a man changes his mind and some complain if he does not. Absurd isn’t it?