<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Administration Legalism Keeps Losing The War On Terror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/30/bush-administration-legalism-keeps-losing-the-war-on-terror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/30/bush-administration-legalism-keeps-losing-the-war-on-terror/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:31:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Porlock Hussein Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/30/bush-administration-legalism-keeps-losing-the-war-on-terror/#comment-102770</link>
		<dc:creator>Porlock Hussein Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/30/bush-administration-legalism-keeps-losing-the-war-on-terror/#comment-102770</guid>
		<description>OMFSM, a Federal court is quoting The Hunting of the Snark? Truly I never thought I&#039;d live to see the day.

Not to mention the excellence of the choice, given modern slang. I mean, that&#039;s a pretty snarky comment they made, isn&#039;t it?

For myself, I prefer this version, which I like to think Lewis Carroll would have approved of:
That what I say three times is true is true is true.

Think before you publish a critique of the grammar. Especially if you have a knee-jerk reaction to &quot;That what&quot;.

We should be doing a Boojum countdown for the Bush Admin:

&quot;In the midst of the word he was trying to say,
In the midst of his laughter and glee,
He softly and suddenly vanished away --
For the Snark was a Boojum, you see.&quot;

January 20 is Boojum Day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMFSM, a Federal court is quoting The Hunting of the Snark? Truly I never thought I&#8217;d live to see the day.</p>
<p>Not to mention the excellence of the choice, given modern slang. I mean, that&#8217;s a pretty snarky comment they made, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>For myself, I prefer this version, which I like to think Lewis Carroll would have approved of:<br />
That what I say three times is true is true is true.</p>
<p>Think before you publish a critique of the grammar. Especially if you have a knee-jerk reaction to &#8220;That what&#8221;.</p>
<p>We should be doing a Boojum countdown for the Bush Admin:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the midst of the word he was trying to say,<br />
In the midst of his laughter and glee,<br />
He softly and suddenly vanished away &#8211;<br />
For the Snark was a Boojum, you see.&#8221;</p>
<p>January 20 is Boojum Day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
