<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain: Taxes For Thee, Not For Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:27:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102678</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102678</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’d love to start fighting Obama on the issues, stroke… but the guy won’t stand still long enough to fight. He’s changing his positions on so many issues, it’s getting tough to find a place where he disagrees with me.
&lt;/i&gt;

That is fucking &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=593495&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hilarious.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’d love to start fighting Obama on the issues, stroke… but the guy won’t stand still long enough to fight. He’s changing his positions on so many issues, it’s getting tough to find a place where he disagrees with me.<br />
</i></p>
<p>That is fucking <a href="http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=593495" rel="nofollow">hilarious.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102663</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102663</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’d love to start fighting Obama on the issues, stroke… but...&quot;

But you are practically incapable of completing a sentence without lying. Back up your claims. 

&quot;Oh, and I don’t recall &#039;complaining&#039; about your calling me &#039;subhuman.&#039;&quot;

I do. But I&#039;m smart and you are a troglodyte. 

&quot;I just bring it up to remind casual observers of what a frothing loony you tend to be.&quot;

And laughing at my death, what does that make you? 

I&#039;ll tell you what that makes you, that makes you exactly what you think I am. You hate me, because you&#039;ve projected all of your emotional flaws onto me. You really hate yourself, which is practically the only position we agree on. If I were you, I would be filled with self-loathing as well. 

You are, not to put too fine a point on it, nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d love to start fighting Obama on the issues, stroke… but&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>But you are practically incapable of completing a sentence without lying. Back up your claims. </p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, and I don’t recall &#8216;complaining&#8217; about your calling me &#8217;subhuman.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>I do. But I&#8217;m smart and you are a troglodyte. </p>
<p>&#8220;I just bring it up to remind casual observers of what a frothing loony you tend to be.&#8221;</p>
<p>And laughing at my death, what does that make you? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you what that makes you, that makes you exactly what you think I am. You hate me, because you&#8217;ve projected all of your emotional flaws onto me. You really hate yourself, which is practically the only position we agree on. If I were you, I would be filled with self-loathing as well. </p>
<p>You are, not to put too fine a point on it, nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midderpidge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102647</link>
		<dc:creator>midderpidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102647</guid>
		<description>Oh!!!  Bob Barr to the rescue for JayTea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh!!!  Bob Barr to the rescue for JayTea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midderpidge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102646</link>
		<dc:creator>midderpidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102646</guid>
		<description>So how do you feel about McCain&#039;s ever changing positions?  Even on the issues you just spouted as examples?  You will really be in a quandry at the ballot box this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how do you feel about McCain&#8217;s ever changing positions?  Even on the issues you just spouted as examples?  You will really be in a quandry at the ballot box this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102604</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102604</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to start fighting Obama on the issues, stroke... but the guy won&#039;t stand still long enough to fight. He&#039;s changing his positions on so many issues, it&#039;s getting tough to find a place where he disagrees with me. 

For example, I support NAFTA. When he came out so strongly against it -- even saying we should scrap it -- I was comofortable opposing him. Now he says that NAFTA is pretty good, just needs some tweaking. 

He spent years and years and years fighting for gun control, serving on the board of one of the most militant gun-grabbing groups around and saying that he had no problem outlawing handguns entirely. I liked that position -- it was clear, it was upfront, and I could disagree with him quite easily. Then, after the Heller decision, he said that he agreed that the DC ban (which he had supported) was unconstitutional.

I could almost support him -- if I believed that his &quot;progress&quot; and &quot;evolution&quot; towards positions I hold was sincere.

Oh, and I don&#039;t recall &quot;complaining&quot; about your calling me &quot;subhuman.&quot; I just bring it up to remind casual observers of what a frothing loony you tend to be. Hell, I uaually take it as an affirmation that you&#039;ve run out of any other arguments, and kind of see it as a trophy.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to start fighting Obama on the issues, stroke&#8230; but the guy won&#8217;t stand still long enough to fight. He&#8217;s changing his positions on so many issues, it&#8217;s getting tough to find a place where he disagrees with me. </p>
<p>For example, I support NAFTA. When he came out so strongly against it &#8212; even saying we should scrap it &#8212; I was comofortable opposing him. Now he says that NAFTA is pretty good, just needs some tweaking. </p>
<p>He spent years and years and years fighting for gun control, serving on the board of one of the most militant gun-grabbing groups around and saying that he had no problem outlawing handguns entirely. I liked that position &#8212; it was clear, it was upfront, and I could disagree with him quite easily. Then, after the Heller decision, he said that he agreed that the DC ban (which he had supported) was unconstitutional.</p>
<p>I could almost support him &#8212; if I believed that his &#8220;progress&#8221; and &#8220;evolution&#8221; towards positions I hold was sincere.</p>
<p>Oh, and I don&#8217;t recall &#8220;complaining&#8221; about your calling me &#8220;subhuman.&#8221; I just bring it up to remind casual observers of what a frothing loony you tend to be. Hell, I uaually take it as an affirmation that you&#8217;ve run out of any other arguments, and kind of see it as a trophy.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102590</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102590</guid>
		<description>&quot;You know it’s really funny that the conservative right has been throwing shit into the fan to see what will stick...&quot;

It&#039;s exactly what is happening. And each attack that fails will make it harder for the next attack to stick, even if by some miracle they cut the lies and start fighting Obama on the issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You know it’s really funny that the conservative right has been throwing shit into the fan to see what will stick&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s exactly what is happening. And each attack that fails will make it harder for the next attack to stick, even if by some miracle they cut the lies and start fighting Obama on the issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midderpidge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102587</link>
		<dc:creator>midderpidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102587</guid>
		<description>You know it&#039;s really funny that the conservative right has been throwing shit into the fan to see what will stick, and their last batch was trying to paint Obama as an elitist.  Hilarious, when his opponent and wife have so many houses they can&#039;t keep track of them.

And McCain should not be using his wife&#039;s jet.  He looks like an ass because he complains about every congressperson using private corporate jets and yet oh, he does it too.  Let them eat cake indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know it&#8217;s really funny that the conservative right has been throwing shit into the fan to see what will stick, and their last batch was trying to paint Obama as an elitist.  Hilarious, when his opponent and wife have so many houses they can&#8217;t keep track of them.</p>
<p>And McCain should not be using his wife&#8217;s jet.  He looks like an ass because he complains about every congressperson using private corporate jets and yet oh, he does it too.  Let them eat cake indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102581</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102581</guid>
		<description>&quot;Who’s &#039;scared&#039; of strong words, stroke? I use them myself. I don’t care for their CASUAL use. I like saving them for just the right times, and I don’t like their rhetorical power being diluted through overuse. And you, sir, would be verbally crippled without them.&quot;

First of all, swear words hold no power, rhetorical or otherwise. The word fuck merely sounds good. To borrow terminology from Monty Python, &#039;fuck&#039; is a very woody word. I don&#039;t use most of the other &#039;swear words&#039; because I don&#039;t like how they sound. &#039;Piss&#039; and &#039;shit&#039;, for instance, sound tinny. 

Secondly, when I swear, you ignore my point and concentrate on the swear word(s). You can&#039;t handle them, because you are a child. You are a child mentally and emotionally, if not chronologically. 

&quot;And I call you “stroke” as a caution — you get so worked up on occasion,&quot;

Two points.

1.) You are fucking lying.
2.) I don&#039;t get worked up. 

&quot;If you were to have a stroke, or a coronary, or an aneurysm, over the discussions here, I’d feel bad for you.
Then, I’d laugh my fucking ass off.&quot;

You just lost the right to complain when anyone calls you sub-human. Congratulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who’s &#8217;scared&#8217; of strong words, stroke? I use them myself. I don’t care for their CASUAL use. I like saving them for just the right times, and I don’t like their rhetorical power being diluted through overuse. And you, sir, would be verbally crippled without them.&#8221;</p>
<p>First of all, swear words hold no power, rhetorical or otherwise. The word fuck merely sounds good. To borrow terminology from Monty Python, &#8216;fuck&#8217; is a very woody word. I don&#8217;t use most of the other &#8217;swear words&#8217; because I don&#8217;t like how they sound. &#8216;Piss&#8217; and &#8217;shit&#8217;, for instance, sound tinny. </p>
<p>Secondly, when I swear, you ignore my point and concentrate on the swear word(s). You can&#8217;t handle them, because you are a child. You are a child mentally and emotionally, if not chronologically. </p>
<p>&#8220;And I call you “stroke” as a caution — you get so worked up on occasion,&#8221;</p>
<p>Two points.</p>
<p>1.) You are fucking lying.<br />
2.) I don&#8217;t get worked up. </p>
<p>&#8220;If you were to have a stroke, or a coronary, or an aneurysm, over the discussions here, I’d feel bad for you.<br />
Then, I’d laugh my fucking ass off.&#8221;</p>
<p>You just lost the right to complain when anyone calls you sub-human. Congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102580</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102580</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s &quot;scared&quot; of strong words, stroke? I use them myself. I don&#039;t care for their CASUAL use. I like saving them for just the right times, and I don&#039;t like their rhetorical power being diluted through overuse. And you, sir, would be verbally crippled without them.

And I call you &quot;stroke&quot; as a caution -- you get so worked up on occasion, I worry you might actually give yourself one. I figure if I keep using the term, it might remind you to keep yourself calm.

If you were to have a stroke, or a coronary, or an aneurysm, over the discussions here, I&#039;d feel bad for you.

Then, I&#039;d laugh my fucking ass off.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s &#8220;scared&#8221; of strong words, stroke? I use them myself. I don&#8217;t care for their CASUAL use. I like saving them for just the right times, and I don&#8217;t like their rhetorical power being diluted through overuse. And you, sir, would be verbally crippled without them.</p>
<p>And I call you &#8220;stroke&#8221; as a caution &#8212; you get so worked up on occasion, I worry you might actually give yourself one. I figure if I keep using the term, it might remind you to keep yourself calm.</p>
<p>If you were to have a stroke, or a coronary, or an aneurysm, over the discussions here, I&#8217;d feel bad for you.</p>
<p>Then, I&#8217;d laugh my fucking ass off.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102577</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102577</guid>
		<description>&quot;OK, this is new to me but as one interested in lexicography, I’d like to hear more. Magic?&quot;

There&#039;s a reason why it is sometimes called cursing. Certain words are deemed inappropriate because people used to think that if you said the right syllables in the right order you could cast spells. &#039;Dammit!&#039; is an obvious example, but at one time it was thought that if you knew how, you could shrink the teats of your neighbour&#039;s cow, for example.

Despite the fact that this is patently retarded, it still persists today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;OK, this is new to me but as one interested in lexicography, I’d like to hear more. Magic?&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason why it is sometimes called cursing. Certain words are deemed inappropriate because people used to think that if you said the right syllables in the right order you could cast spells. &#8216;Dammit!&#8217; is an obvious example, but at one time it was thought that if you knew how, you could shrink the teats of your neighbour&#8217;s cow, for example.</p>
<p>Despite the fact that this is patently retarded, it still persists today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102575</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102575</guid>
		<description>SaveFarris: &lt;i&gt;Please please please let Olbermann report this on Monday…&lt;/i&gt;

See, here&#039;s a difference I think apparent between the two &quot;sides&quot; that get involved in discussions like this.  I don&#039;t think anyone who is saying McCain should pay his taxes is saying that Olbermann shouldn&#039;t.  Yet, those defending McCain seem to think finding someone on the other side who likewise hasn&#039;t paid means McCain shouldn&#039;t be criticized.

I&#039;m generalizing, but the &quot;Hey, look.  One of your guys did it to so you shouldn&#039;t pick on our guy&quot; defense is childish.  The proper response is &quot;Hey, one of your guys did it to so he should also be picked on for it.&quot;  Then, if &quot;we&quot; reply with anything other than &quot;You&#039;re right. He should.&quot; you can honestly call &quot;us&quot; hypocrites instead of being such obvious ones yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SaveFarris: <i>Please please please let Olbermann report this on Monday…</i></p>
<p>See, here&#8217;s a difference I think apparent between the two &#8220;sides&#8221; that get involved in discussions like this.  I don&#8217;t think anyone who is saying McCain should pay his taxes is saying that Olbermann shouldn&#8217;t.  Yet, those defending McCain seem to think finding someone on the other side who likewise hasn&#8217;t paid means McCain shouldn&#8217;t be criticized.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m generalizing, but the &#8220;Hey, look.  One of your guys did it to so you shouldn&#8217;t pick on our guy&#8221; defense is childish.  The proper response is &#8220;Hey, one of your guys did it to so he should also be picked on for it.&#8221;  Then, if &#8220;we&#8221; reply with anything other than &#8220;You&#8217;re right. He should.&#8221; you can honestly call &#8220;us&#8221; hypocrites instead of being such obvious ones yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102574</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102574</guid>
		<description>CSS: &lt;i&gt;There is no logical reason for people to be scared of that word. In fact, the two main reasons are based on puritanical rules and belief in magic.&lt;/i&gt;

OK, this is new to me but as one interested in lexicography, I&#039;d like to hear more.  Magic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSS: <i>There is no logical reason for people to be scared of that word. In fact, the two main reasons are based on puritanical rules and belief in magic.</i></p>
<p>OK, this is new to me but as one interested in lexicography, I&#8217;d like to hear more.  Magic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102573</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102573</guid>
		<description>JT: &lt;i&gt;So, stroke, you’re saying that McCain should have paid his wife full value for the use of her jet? Wouldn’t that provoke cries that he was channeling campaign funds into his family’s pockets?&lt;/i&gt;

Gee, you&#039;re right.  That&#039;s a damned if you do, damned if you don&#039;t situation.

Maybe it would be best if he didn&#039;t, y&#039;know, use his wife&#039;s jets &lt;b&gt;at all&lt;/b&gt;.  Avoid that whole appearance of impropriety thing, keep the finances truly separate and not just claim they are.

Nah.  Can&#039;t expect John McC to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT: <i>So, stroke, you’re saying that McCain should have paid his wife full value for the use of her jet? Wouldn’t that provoke cries that he was channeling campaign funds into his family’s pockets?</i></p>
<p>Gee, you&#8217;re right.  That&#8217;s a damned if you do, damned if you don&#8217;t situation.</p>
<p>Maybe it would be best if he didn&#8217;t, y&#8217;know, use his wife&#8217;s jets <b>at all</b>.  Avoid that whole appearance of impropriety thing, keep the finances truly separate and not just claim they are.</p>
<p>Nah.  Can&#8217;t expect John McC to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102569</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102569</guid>
		<description>&quot;Typical JT- heads he wins, tails you lose. You’re right C.S., he is subhuman trash and doesn’t deserve the benefit of a reply. I guess some people aren’t educable.&quot;

Incapable or unwilling to act like a human being. It seems his plan is to piss off the people he is debating with until they snap at him and then declare victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Typical JT- heads he wins, tails you lose. You’re right C.S., he is subhuman trash and doesn’t deserve the benefit of a reply. I guess some people aren’t educable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Incapable or unwilling to act like a human being. It seems his plan is to piss off the people he is debating with until they snap at him and then declare victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102568</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102568</guid>
		<description>&quot;So, stroke, you’re saying that McCain should have paid his wife full value for the use of her jet?&quot;

Yes. 

&quot;Wouldn’t that provoke cries that he was channeling campaign funds into his family’s pockets?&quot;

No. 

As long as it is fair market value I don&#039;t see an issue. Paying more? That would be an issue, as you brought up above. (It has happened in the past.) 

&quot;My goodness, stroke. I’m trying to recall a single comment of yours that didn’t degenerate into hysterical cussing and name-calling, and I’m coming up blank.&quot;

Hysterical? I wasn&#039;t hysterical when I used the word, &#039;fuck.&#039; As for name calling, if you don&#039;t want to be called a liar, then don&#039;t lie. 

By the way, calling me &#039;Stroke&#039; and a &#039;child&#039; is name calling. So that makes you a hypocrite, as well as a liar. 

&quot;Just because you know all the dirty words, child, doesn’t mean you have to constantly use them.&quot;

The words are not dirty. And the fact that you can&#039;t figure this our is part of what makes you a child. 

Remember, practically everyone you meet is the direct result of two people fucking. There is no logical reason for people to be scared of that word. In fact, the two main reasons are based on puritanical rules and belief in magic. But magic doesn&#039;t exist in the real world and puritans can go fuck themselves. Literally. If these assholes got laid a little more, they wouldn&#039;t try and force their misery onto others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, stroke, you’re saying that McCain should have paid his wife full value for the use of her jet?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. </p>
<p>&#8220;Wouldn’t that provoke cries that he was channeling campaign funds into his family’s pockets?&#8221;</p>
<p>No. </p>
<p>As long as it is fair market value I don&#8217;t see an issue. Paying more? That would be an issue, as you brought up above. (It has happened in the past.) </p>
<p>&#8220;My goodness, stroke. I’m trying to recall a single comment of yours that didn’t degenerate into hysterical cussing and name-calling, and I’m coming up blank.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hysterical? I wasn&#8217;t hysterical when I used the word, &#8216;fuck.&#8217; As for name calling, if you don&#8217;t want to be called a liar, then don&#8217;t lie. </p>
<p>By the way, calling me &#8216;Stroke&#8217; and a &#8216;child&#8217; is name calling. So that makes you a hypocrite, as well as a liar. </p>
<p>&#8220;Just because you know all the dirty words, child, doesn’t mean you have to constantly use them.&#8221;</p>
<p>The words are not dirty. And the fact that you can&#8217;t figure this our is part of what makes you a child. </p>
<p>Remember, practically everyone you meet is the direct result of two people fucking. There is no logical reason for people to be scared of that word. In fact, the two main reasons are based on puritanical rules and belief in magic. But magic doesn&#8217;t exist in the real world and puritans can go fuck themselves. Literally. If these assholes got laid a little more, they wouldn&#8217;t try and force their misery onto others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102566</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102566</guid>
		<description>&quot;So, stroke, you’re saying that McCain should have paid his wife full value for the use of her jet? &quot;

Typical JT- heads he wins, tails you lose.  You&#039;re right C.S., he is subhuman trash and doesn&#039;t deserve the benefit of a reply.  I guess some people aren&#039;t educable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, stroke, you’re saying that McCain should have paid his wife full value for the use of her jet? &#8221;</p>
<p>Typical JT- heads he wins, tails you lose.  You&#8217;re right C.S., he is subhuman trash and doesn&#8217;t deserve the benefit of a reply.  I guess some people aren&#8217;t educable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102564</guid>
		<description>So, stroke, you&#039;re saying that McCain should have paid his wife full value for the use of her jet? Wouldn&#039;t that provoke cries that he was channeling campaign funds into his family&#039;s pockets?

My goodness, stroke. I&#039;m trying to recall a single comment of yours that didn&#039;t degenerate into hysterical cussing and name-calling, and I&#039;m coming up blank. 

Just because you know all the dirty words, child, doesn&#039;t mean you have to constantly use them.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, stroke, you&#8217;re saying that McCain should have paid his wife full value for the use of her jet? Wouldn&#8217;t that provoke cries that he was channeling campaign funds into his family&#8217;s pockets?</p>
<p>My goodness, stroke. I&#8217;m trying to recall a single comment of yours that didn&#8217;t degenerate into hysterical cussing and name-calling, and I&#8217;m coming up blank. </p>
<p>Just because you know all the dirty words, child, doesn&#8217;t mean you have to constantly use them.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102562</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102562</guid>
		<description>&quot;Please please please let Olbermann report this on Monday…&quot;

Maybe he will award himself the Worst Person in the World. It wouldn&#039;t be the first time he has done that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Please please please let Olbermann report this on Monday…&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe he will award himself the Worst Person in the World. It wouldn&#8217;t be the first time he has done that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102560</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102560</guid>
		<description>Please please please let &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=5006105&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Olbermann&lt;/a&gt; report this on Monday...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please please please let <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=5006105" rel="nofollow">Olbermann</a> report this on Monday&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102558</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/28/mccain-taxes-for-thee-not-for-me/#comment-102558</guid>
		<description>&quot;Enlightened, if you’d care to show me the prenup between John “Just A Gigolo” Kerry and Theresa (or, even, a reference to one) that shows that their finances are separate, I’d like to see it.&quot;

Wow. The amount of hypocrisy you display is amazing. It is also part of the reason we don&#039;t treat you with any respect. 

By the way, we already know that McCain&#039;s campaign has the use his wife&#039;s jet(s) at well below fair market price. So their finances are not that separate politically. Also, I don&#039;t think John McCain would be able to afford an artificial lake without the use of his wife&#039;s money, so they finances are not completely separate on a personal level either.

In other words, you are a fucking liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Enlightened, if you’d care to show me the prenup between John “Just A Gigolo” Kerry and Theresa (or, even, a reference to one) that shows that their finances are separate, I’d like to see it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow. The amount of hypocrisy you display is amazing. It is also part of the reason we don&#8217;t treat you with any respect. </p>
<p>By the way, we already know that McCain&#8217;s campaign has the use his wife&#8217;s jet(s) at well below fair market price. So their finances are not that separate politically. Also, I don&#8217;t think John McCain would be able to afford an artificial lake without the use of his wife&#8217;s money, so they finances are not completely separate on a personal level either.</p>
<p>In other words, you are a fucking liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
