Comments on: Don’t Take The Money

By: bryan

bryan — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:09:51 +0000

There is research that says that sex ed results in girls losing their virginities later in life, and less teenage pregnancies and STIs, but I suppose special interests will ID, cigarette and climate change that research away in order to keep their position intact.

By: PD100

PD100 — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:22:18 +0000

"Let me guess… Gloucester, Massachusetts is in the “Thanks, but no thanks” column? Knocked Up: Slutfishing in Gloucester with the Rightbloggers

By: matt621

matt621 — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:41:47 +0000

Let me guess… Gloucester, Massachussetts is in the “Thanks, but no thanks” column?

By: Sean D. Martin

Sean D. Martin — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:18:22 +0000

Some $50 million has been budgeted for this year, and financially strapped states might be expected to want their share. But many have doubts that the program does much, if any good, and they’re frustrated by chronic uncertainty that it will even be kept in existence. They also have to chip in state money in order to receive the federal grants./

Well, why wouldn’t any reasonable person not takes these funds.

“Here. We’ll give you money for a program that doesn’t work if you’ll also spend some of your own money on it.”

Seems to me any legislature/governor that has been taking this money ought to be out of office an grounds of pure fiscal incompetence alone.