<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black Cons: Whatever Shall They Do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:40:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: juhar19</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-101222</link>
		<dc:creator>juhar19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-101222</guid>
		<description>It was only by Presidential executive orders and Supreme Court decisions that civil rights and equal rights were enacted.  Black Democrats like most Americans vote in their interests and it is the same for Black Republicans.

I still don&#039;t understand why Black Democrats seem angry with Black Republicans as if they need to be converted from a cult.  The majority group and all minority and ethnic groups are made up of both Democrats and Republicans, why would Blacks be any different.  Just as White voters are not monolithic, either are Black voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was only by Presidential executive orders and Supreme Court decisions that civil rights and equal rights were enacted.  Black Democrats like most Americans vote in their interests and it is the same for Black Republicans.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t understand why Black Democrats seem angry with Black Republicans as if they need to be converted from a cult.  The majority group and all minority and ethnic groups are made up of both Democrats and Republicans, why would Blacks be any different.  Just as White voters are not monolithic, either are Black voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juhar19</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-101219</link>
		<dc:creator>juhar19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-101219</guid>
		<description>Not to confuse my words with the USA Today article,the last sentence above was my statemen: &quot;In order to achieve diversity, the need for racial inclusion is as real as the need for gender balance.&quot;

When John F. Kennedy said &quot;...my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.  My fellow Americans includes women and men of all minority and ethnic groups.  AFFIRMATIVE ACTION was created for inclusion - DIVERSITY is the big bonus that&#039;s achieved when men and women of all minority and ethnic groups can learn from one another and make this nation stronger.

PT Cruiser: If black Republicans truly desire to recruit more black voters to their party then they will need to create a political agenda that moves beyond attempting to use issues such as abortion, gay marriage and prayers in school to drive a wedge between African American voters and the Democratic Party. 

I almost didn&#039;t respond to the Black Conservatives: Whatever Shall They Do because Most Black Conservatives are Black Democrats.  A very large number of Black Democrats are against abortion and gay marriage, but their vote is usually for Democrats because they do not want laws made to take away the individual rights to make their own choices and be accountable to God for their own actions.  

Black Democrats do not need a history lesson to remember that segregation laws were sustained by the popular vote of the people, local and state legislatures. It was only by Presidential executive orders and Supreme Court decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to confuse my words with the USA Today article,the last sentence above was my statemen: &#8220;In order to achieve diversity, the need for racial inclusion is as real as the need for gender balance.&#8221;</p>
<p>When John F. Kennedy said &#8220;&#8230;my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.  My fellow Americans includes women and men of all minority and ethnic groups.  AFFIRMATIVE ACTION was created for inclusion &#8211; DIVERSITY is the big bonus that&#8217;s achieved when men and women of all minority and ethnic groups can learn from one another and make this nation stronger.</p>
<p>PT Cruiser: If black Republicans truly desire to recruit more black voters to their party then they will need to create a political agenda that moves beyond attempting to use issues such as abortion, gay marriage and prayers in school to drive a wedge between African American voters and the Democratic Party. </p>
<p>I almost didn&#8217;t respond to the Black Conservatives: Whatever Shall They Do because Most Black Conservatives are Black Democrats.  A very large number of Black Democrats are against abortion and gay marriage, but their vote is usually for Democrats because they do not want laws made to take away the individual rights to make their own choices and be accountable to God for their own actions.  </p>
<p>Black Democrats do not need a history lesson to remember that segregation laws were sustained by the popular vote of the people, local and state legislatures. It was only by Presidential executive orders and Supreme Court decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juhar19</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-101159</link>
		<dc:creator>juhar19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-101159</guid>
		<description>Amused Observer: 

I have heard gender balance argument in college admissions debated many times. The need for the college experience, social life, dating and the need of husbands was included in some of the reasons supporting gender balance.  Just Google “gender balance in college admissions” are you will find far more than the few I have cited below:

Christian Science Monitor:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0724/p08s01-comv.html

When researchers at US News &amp; World Report magazine analyzed data from more than 1,400 four-year colleges and universities, they found that in the past decade, many schools had maintained gender balance by admitting many more men than women, even when the women candidates were more qualified.

Admissions directors cite several reasons for wanting to keep the numbers as equal as possible. Balance makes social life easier. It also helps schools attract the best candidates of both sexes: When the gender balance tilts to a 60-40 ratio, favoring either gender, students are less interested in attending. 

National Public Radio (NPR)
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11185546

Magazine Researches Gender Gaps at Colleges

More women apply to college than men so colleges with elective admissions hope to maintain gender balance by admitting fewer women that men. While just a few decades ago women were not even allowed to enter the nation&#039;s most prestigious universities, now collective success of women nationwide may be making women victims of their own success. 

Alex Kingsbury of U.S. News &amp; World Report talks to Anthony Brooks about the magazine&#039;s research into gender gaps in college admissions.

USA TODAY
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-04-02-our-view_x.htm

Lately, a nationwide shortage of highly qualified male applicants has admissions directors at private institutions (along with a few from public universities, which face separate legal issues when making exceptions based on race or gender) reaching deeper into their applicant pools to get something close to gender balance on campus. 

In order to achieve diversity, the need for racial inclusion is as real as the need for gender balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amused Observer: </p>
<p>I have heard gender balance argument in college admissions debated many times. The need for the college experience, social life, dating and the need of husbands was included in some of the reasons supporting gender balance.  Just Google “gender balance in college admissions” are you will find far more than the few I have cited below:</p>
<p>Christian Science Monitor:<br />
<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0724/p08s01-comv.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0724/p08s01-comv.html</a></p>
<p>When researchers at US News &amp; World Report magazine analyzed data from more than 1,400 four-year colleges and universities, they found that in the past decade, many schools had maintained gender balance by admitting many more men than women, even when the women candidates were more qualified.</p>
<p>Admissions directors cite several reasons for wanting to keep the numbers as equal as possible. Balance makes social life easier. It also helps schools attract the best candidates of both sexes: When the gender balance tilts to a 60-40 ratio, favoring either gender, students are less interested in attending. </p>
<p>National Public Radio (NPR)<br />
<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11185546" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11185546</a></p>
<p>Magazine Researches Gender Gaps at Colleges</p>
<p>More women apply to college than men so colleges with elective admissions hope to maintain gender balance by admitting fewer women that men. While just a few decades ago women were not even allowed to enter the nation&#8217;s most prestigious universities, now collective success of women nationwide may be making women victims of their own success. </p>
<p>Alex Kingsbury of U.S. News &amp; World Report talks to Anthony Brooks about the magazine&#8217;s research into gender gaps in college admissions.</p>
<p>USA TODAY<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-04-02-our-view_x.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-04-02-our-view_x.htm</a></p>
<p>Lately, a nationwide shortage of highly qualified male applicants has admissions directors at private institutions (along with a few from public universities, which face separate legal issues when making exceptions based on race or gender) reaching deeper into their applicant pools to get something close to gender balance on campus. </p>
<p>In order to achieve diversity, the need for racial inclusion is as real as the need for gender balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-101105</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-101105</guid>
		<description>Juhar,
Cite please?  While female admissions have jumped, this is the first I&#039;ve heard of husband rationing as an admission policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juhar,<br />
Cite please?  While female admissions have jumped, this is the first I&#8217;ve heard of husband rationing as an admission policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juhar19</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100992</link>
		<dc:creator>juhar19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100992</guid>
		<description>Amused Observer:  &quot;A policy of racial discrimination is wrong.&quot;

But gender discrimination is &quot;a OK.&quot;  Why aren’t Affirmative Action critics speaking about the “new entitled group’’ – White men. 

As more female achievement and numbers are increasing over young males, more and more universities across the country are incorporating policies to limit the number of qualified women from admission to keep a “gender balance.”  The reasoning? That these women will need husbands?  Affirmative Action is not being used to make sure that “white man is on top” and women underneath.

The real affirmative action today is for “white men” and no one is opposing that. Far more less qualified men are getting into universities than minorities these days and women are being suppressed.  America wake up to CHANGE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amused Observer:  &#8220;A policy of racial discrimination is wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>But gender discrimination is &#8220;a OK.&#8221;  Why aren’t Affirmative Action critics speaking about the “new entitled group’’ – White men. </p>
<p>As more female achievement and numbers are increasing over young males, more and more universities across the country are incorporating policies to limit the number of qualified women from admission to keep a “gender balance.”  The reasoning? That these women will need husbands?  Affirmative Action is not being used to make sure that “white man is on top” and women underneath.</p>
<p>The real affirmative action today is for “white men” and no one is opposing that. Far more less qualified men are getting into universities than minorities these days and women are being suppressed.  America wake up to CHANGE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100979</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100979</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not surprising to find blacks in favor of affirmative action, but it is impossible to square it with the Constitution.

Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868. 
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.



Affirmative Action flat out denies citizens of the right to equal protection.  It doesn&#039;t mattter how many liberal judges break thier oath to uphold the Constitution, it still violates the 14th amendment.  If our LaKeisha Jefferson can&#039;t test high enough to get in on her own merits she shouldn&#039;t displace someone who can.  A policy of racial discrimination is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not surprising to find blacks in favor of affirmative action, but it is impossible to square it with the Constitution.</p>
<p>Amendment 14 &#8211; Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868.<br />
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.</p>
<p>Affirmative Action flat out denies citizens of the right to equal protection.  It doesn&#8217;t mattter how many liberal judges break thier oath to uphold the Constitution, it still violates the 14th amendment.  If our LaKeisha Jefferson can&#8217;t test high enough to get in on her own merits she shouldn&#8217;t displace someone who can.  A policy of racial discrimination is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justadood</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100943</link>
		<dc:creator>justadood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100943</guid>
		<description>*that&#039;s* what I&#039;m sayin&#039;

thanks, Oliver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*that&#8217;s* what I&#8217;m sayin&#8217;</p>
<p>thanks, Oliver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100932</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100932</guid>
		<description>I have a friend who had a high school GPA over 5.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/19/powell.race/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Powell defends affirmative action in college admissions&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Calling himself a &quot;strong proponent&quot; of affirmative action, Secretary of State Colin Powell said Sunday that he believes race should play a role in university admissions.

&quot;I wish it was possible for everything to be race-neutral in this country, but I&#039;m afraid we&#039;re not yet at that point where things are race-neutral,&quot; Powell said on CNN&#039;s &quot;Late Edition.&quot;

&quot;I believe race should be a factor among many other factors in determining the makeup of a student body of a university.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a friend who had a high school GPA over 5.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/19/powell.race/" rel="nofollow">Powell defends affirmative action in college admissions</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Calling himself a &#8220;strong proponent&#8221; of affirmative action, Secretary of State Colin Powell said Sunday that he believes race should play a role in university admissions.</p>
<p>&#8220;I wish it was possible for everything to be race-neutral in this country, but I&#8217;m afraid we&#8217;re not yet at that point where things are race-neutral,&#8221; Powell said on CNN&#8217;s &#8220;Late Edition.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe race should be a factor among many other factors in determining the makeup of a student body of a university.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justadood</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100931</link>
		<dc:creator>justadood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100931</guid>
		<description>Study and hard work get the high GPA--if you need to ask, then you&#039;re probably not working hard enough.  For my hypothetical case, it&#039;s a historical fact that far too many exceptionally well-qualified people of color (even in the era of Affirmative Action) cannot get into the University of their choice, if not because of their color directly, then because their name implies their origin.  
Cogitate this: If an exceptional student in a LA-area school wants to attend UCLA, then they have teh same aspirations as several dozen-thousand of their compatriots in the area, and the School of Law is no exception to that rule.  Especially for Freshman also, finding a &quot;school that more closely matches her ability&quot; is no more valid or useful statement than, say, telling a 10-year-old that becoming an astronaut is out of the question--at this early point, they still are checking to see how well they fit into the academic program, and it&#039;s the prerogative of the underclassman to find the program that fits their capabilities.  Very few people indeed have the option to determine their capabilities before beginning their college career, and that&#039;s even with the assistance of the Counselors.

note also that it&#039;s possible for students, in these days of Advanced Placement courses for high-school seniors, to get GPAs above 4.0 (I knew a couple personally from my school).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Study and hard work get the high GPA&#8211;if you need to ask, then you&#8217;re probably not working hard enough.  For my hypothetical case, it&#8217;s a historical fact that far too many exceptionally well-qualified people of color (even in the era of Affirmative Action) cannot get into the University of their choice, if not because of their color directly, then because their name implies their origin.<br />
Cogitate this: If an exceptional student in a LA-area school wants to attend UCLA, then they have teh same aspirations as several dozen-thousand of their compatriots in the area, and the School of Law is no exception to that rule.  Especially for Freshman also, finding a &#8220;school that more closely matches her ability&#8221; is no more valid or useful statement than, say, telling a 10-year-old that becoming an astronaut is out of the question&#8211;at this early point, they still are checking to see how well they fit into the academic program, and it&#8217;s the prerogative of the underclassman to find the program that fits their capabilities.  Very few people indeed have the option to determine their capabilities before beginning their college career, and that&#8217;s even with the assistance of the Counselors.</p>
<p>note also that it&#8217;s possible for students, in these days of Advanced Placement courses for high-school seniors, to get GPAs above 4.0 (I knew a couple personally from my school).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100912</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100912</guid>
		<description>The policy of inclusion based on group identity over merit is the same as a policy of exclusion based on group identity over merit.  It is intellectually dishonest to argue for one over the other.  

It would indeed be a shame if your hypathetical Ms. Jefferson couldn&#039;t test high enough with a 4.96 g.p.a. to get into a university on her own merits.  Perhaps she needs to go to school that more closely matches her ability rather than displace someone else more qualified.  How does one get a g.p.a. that high anyhow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The policy of inclusion based on group identity over merit is the same as a policy of exclusion based on group identity over merit.  It is intellectually dishonest to argue for one over the other.  </p>
<p>It would indeed be a shame if your hypathetical Ms. Jefferson couldn&#8217;t test high enough with a 4.96 g.p.a. to get into a university on her own merits.  Perhaps she needs to go to school that more closely matches her ability rather than displace someone else more qualified.  How does one get a g.p.a. that high anyhow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justadood</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100906</link>
		<dc:creator>justadood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100906</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s not because of affirmative action, but in spite of it, that have even conservative blacks picking Dems over Republicans.
Affirmative action was created with the express intent of leveling the playing field, which (when used correctly) it has.
That&#039;s not to say it&#039;s done its job and should now be shut down: hell no--if that happens, white America will immediately (and just watch, folks..) begin excluding blacks and other minorities once again from advancement in American Society.  As a white, I see this sentiment far more than makes me comfortable.
Look what happened at the University of California: when AA was in place for admissions, Minority enrollment for under and post-grad studies pretty much matched census percentages.  After Ward Connerly killed it, black enrollment immediately dropped to well below 10%, and for some post-grad programs, amlost dropped completely.  One excuse I recall given for this was rejection of &#039;black-sounding&#039; names, as compared to admitting strictly on GPA and class placement....so it didn&#039;t matter that LaKeisha Jefferson was salutatorian of her high-shcool graduating class, her 4.96 GPA wouldn&#039;t be enough to be admitted into pre-Law or government at UCLA or Berkeley, while such achievement would be more than adequate for Charles Johnson, say...
Personally, I have never had a problem with programs like Affirmative Action, even when my getting hired might have been adversely affected because of it:  it&#039;s imperfect, but the least we can to to begin paying back Minorities for the decades (or centuries) of oppression, repression, and plain mistreatment directed by us against them.
Don&#039;t feel badly about taking advantage of this &#039;leg up&#039; in education and hiring: rules are meant to be taken advantage of in *any* game, life included.  Use it, get your start (or get ahead)...show me why it is I respect you, or why I should respect you, and see you at work later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not because of affirmative action, but in spite of it, that have even conservative blacks picking Dems over Republicans.<br />
Affirmative action was created with the express intent of leveling the playing field, which (when used correctly) it has.<br />
That&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s done its job and should now be shut down: hell no&#8211;if that happens, white America will immediately (and just watch, folks..) begin excluding blacks and other minorities once again from advancement in American Society.  As a white, I see this sentiment far more than makes me comfortable.<br />
Look what happened at the University of California: when AA was in place for admissions, Minority enrollment for under and post-grad studies pretty much matched census percentages.  After Ward Connerly killed it, black enrollment immediately dropped to well below 10%, and for some post-grad programs, amlost dropped completely.  One excuse I recall given for this was rejection of &#8216;black-sounding&#8217; names, as compared to admitting strictly on GPA and class placement&#8230;.so it didn&#8217;t matter that LaKeisha Jefferson was salutatorian of her high-shcool graduating class, her 4.96 GPA wouldn&#8217;t be enough to be admitted into pre-Law or government at UCLA or Berkeley, while such achievement would be more than adequate for Charles Johnson, say&#8230;<br />
Personally, I have never had a problem with programs like Affirmative Action, even when my getting hired might have been adversely affected because of it:  it&#8217;s imperfect, but the least we can to to begin paying back Minorities for the decades (or centuries) of oppression, repression, and plain mistreatment directed by us against them.<br />
Don&#8217;t feel badly about taking advantage of this &#8216;leg up&#8217; in education and hiring: rules are meant to be taken advantage of in *any* game, life included.  Use it, get your start (or get ahead)&#8230;show me why it is I respect you, or why I should respect you, and see you at work later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100903</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100903</guid>
		<description>&quot;As far as black conservatives in the actual population, they’ll vote for Obama because they’re not morons&quot;

Now that is a mature viewpoint, what stunning insight.

LOL, I wonder why blacks overwhelmingly choose the Democratic party?  It couldn&#039;t possibly because of affirmative action could it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As far as black conservatives in the actual population, they’ll vote for Obama because they’re not morons&#8221;</p>
<p>Now that is a mature viewpoint, what stunning insight.</p>
<p>LOL, I wonder why blacks overwhelmingly choose the Democratic party?  It couldn&#8217;t possibly because of affirmative action could it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100878</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100878</guid>
		<description>Major factor IMO; Katrina.
Look at LA two years after the 1994 earthquake, and then look at New Orleans now, and then remember the lack of action on the part of Bush and his appointees, and then remember the partisan blame game played afterwards, and the deaths, and then wonder why the GOP is doing so poorly amongst black voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major factor IMO; Katrina.<br />
Look at LA two years after the 1994 earthquake, and then look at New Orleans now, and then remember the lack of action on the part of Bush and his appointees, and then remember the partisan blame game played afterwards, and the deaths, and then wonder why the GOP is doing so poorly amongst black voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrixieTheStreetwalker</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100873</link>
		<dc:creator>TrixieTheStreetwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100873</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Armstrong Williams, who is a bought and paid for whore &lt;/i&gt;

No he&#039;s not -- we kicked him out of the union for not having enough self-respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Armstrong Williams, who is a bought and paid for whore </i></p>
<p>No he&#8217;s not &#8212; we kicked him out of the union for not having enough self-respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anotherbozo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100862</link>
		<dc:creator>anotherbozo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100862</guid>
		<description>I garbled that.  Marshall was asked why some black politicians chose to throw their lot with conservatism.  He said they just compare paths to advancement, &quot;then they go stand in the shorter line.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I garbled that.  Marshall was asked why some black politicians chose to throw their lot with conservatism.  He said they just compare paths to advancement, &#8220;then they go stand in the shorter line.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anotherbozo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100861</link>
		<dc:creator>anotherbozo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100861</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t forget what Justice Thurgood Marshall (see the Broadway show) said when he was asked about black conservatives.  He said they just compare paths to advancement, &quot;then they go stand in the shorter line.&quot;  Devastating.

If anybody has the exact quote, I&#039;d appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t forget what Justice Thurgood Marshall (see the Broadway show) said when he was asked about black conservatives.  He said they just compare paths to advancement, &#8220;then they go stand in the shorter line.&#8221;  Devastating.</p>
<p>If anybody has the exact quote, I&#8217;d appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soullite</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100859</link>
		<dc:creator>soullite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100859</guid>
		<description>Lmao, What will black cons do? Why, keep on cashing those Republican checks. The same thing they&#039;ve always done, with a smile on their faces.

 If you were a Republican, you&#039;d be a millionaire right now Mr. Willis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lmao, What will black cons do? Why, keep on cashing those Republican checks. The same thing they&#8217;ve always done, with a smile on their faces.</p>
<p> If you were a Republican, you&#8217;d be a millionaire right now Mr. Willis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100858</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100858</guid>
		<description>&quot;Just making sure I understand. Santa and black conservatives are both fictitious, or Santa and Obama?&quot;

The first one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just making sure I understand. Santa and black conservatives are both fictitious, or Santa and Obama?&#8221;</p>
<p>The first one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100857</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100857</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No, they’ll vote for Santa Claus because they are both fictitious.&lt;/i&gt;

Just making sure I understand.  Santa and black conservatives are both fictitious, or Santa and Obama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No, they’ll vote for Santa Claus because they are both fictitious.</i></p>
<p>Just making sure I understand.  Santa and black conservatives are both fictitious, or Santa and Obama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100854</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/06/15/black-cons-whatever-shall-they-do/#comment-100854</guid>
		<description>C.S.Strowbridge,

Good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C.S.Strowbridge,</p>
<p>Good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
