These people are insane. Not only do they want to cut taxes for big corporations like the energy companies, but the way they think we should make up for it is to cut defense spending?
Even the people who support cuts in defense spending (I’m not much for that) would think that doing so to give ExxonMobil and the airlines another sweetheart deal is ridiculous.
Related
Is Ben Bernanke Emulating The Japanese?
The Missile Defense Boondoggle
McCain Offers Deregulation As Solution To Deregulation Based Fiscal Crisis
But wait, what about Airbus?
Defense spending, like all appropriations, are driven by Congress. The Defense Appropriation Bill is a favorite place for political pork of all shapes and sizes. This is where Congressman order expensive weapon systems that not even the military wants. If the Air Force wants to order 100 F-22s, for example, Congress will up it to 150, just to keep defense plants in their districts and constituents who work in them happy.
However you may want to see it, this is wasteful spending. McCain is being consistent here.
Oliver,
I have been reading your blog for only a short while, but it surprises me that you’re not for a reduction in defense spending. The defense spending of the US accounts for almost half the world’s total (although still relatively low as a percentage of GDP). Does this not strike you as inappropriately high? (I’m not endorsing this particular attitude, only raising the issue to you.)
I will endorse, however, that to pay for a tax cut to the oil industry with defense cuts is a bad idea. This doesn’t seem to jive with McCain’s desired image of himself as a Teddy Roosevelt-style conservationist trust-buster Republican.
Clearly, military spending needs some sorely needed oversight. We could save a shit load of money if the Pentagon had to justify their needs and the Congress didn’t muck about, as noted.
(reminds me of Independence Day when the President comes into Area 51; “How do you get the money for this?”
“$3,000 hammers? $8,000 toilet seats?” Hello?!
But funding corporate tax cuts at the expense of military readiness? That’s just crazy.
I fail to see how the US is even remotely in need of “military readiness”, Duros.
And as much as crony capitalism disgusts me, I’ll take it over machine guns and nukes any day.
Right, and the Pentagon didn’t cop recently to being completely unable to account for over 1 TRILLION in expenditures. Maybe we should consider diverting those funds to energy research, space exploration, medicine, infrastructure or any of a million other things that will make us more secure than maintaining a lethal strike force better suited to last century warfare or securing oil.
“a lethal strike force better suited to last century warfare”
This is an excellent point. Post-WWII asymmetric wars are far more common than good ol’ state-to-state ‘capture capitals and occupy territory wars.’ As we’ve seen in Vietnam and possibly Iraq (though it may be too early to tell), the guerrillas have the advantage.