Comments on: Yes Cazayoux Can http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:31:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: daniel rotter http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93606 daniel rotter Tue, 06 May 2008 01:49:02 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93606 "Lincoln Chafee is no longer a republican". Well, okay, but he was when he was in the U.S. Senate, and that's what I was talking about. “Lincoln Chafee is no longer a republican”.

Well, okay, but he was when he was in the U.S. Senate, and that’s what I was talking about.

]]> By: Duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93484 Duros62 Mon, 05 May 2008 03:47:40 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93484 Lincoln Chafee is no longer a republican. Lincoln Chafee is no longer a republican.

]]> By: daniel rotter http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93479 daniel rotter Mon, 05 May 2008 03:01:37 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93479 "...but a conservative Democrat is better than any kind of Republican". I disagree. I'd rather have a Lincoln Chafee than a Zell Miller. “…but a conservative Democrat is better than any kind of Republican”.

I disagree. I’d rather have a Lincoln Chafee than a Zell Miller.

]]> By: daniel rotter http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93461 daniel rotter Sun, 04 May 2008 21:50:46 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93461 In my post, I meant to write "probably," not proably". In my post, I meant to write “probably,” not proably”.

]]> By: C.S.Strowbridge http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93428 C.S.Strowbridge Sun, 04 May 2008 10:04:12 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93428 "Cazayoux will probably vote with conservative Republicans on everything, though." Actually, while he is more conservative than almost all Democrats, he's more liberal than almost all Republicans. He won't be the most progressive person in the legislative branch, but he's certainly an upgrade from before. "And they tried the old playbook on him and it didn’t work." It's is worse than that. The NRCC sunk in about 6% of their total cash on hand to lose a seat that is 6.5% more Republican than the country on average. Also, it's hard to imagine they will be able to convince a lot of people to donate to the party after this loss. Next up is MS-01, which the Republicans have spend twice as much money defending a seat that is 10% more Republicans than the country is on average. Since Travis Childers actually beat Greg Davis in the preliminary election, there's a good chance the Democrats will win this one as well. A win by the Democrats here could result in suicides by hardcore Republicans. “Cazayoux will probably vote with conservative Republicans on everything, though.”

Actually, while he is more conservative than almost all Democrats, he’s more liberal than almost all Republicans. He won’t be the most progressive person in the legislative branch, but he’s certainly an upgrade from before.

“And they tried the old playbook on him and it didn’t work.”

It’s is worse than that. The NRCC sunk in about 6% of their total cash on hand to lose a seat that is 6.5% more Republican than the country on average.

Also, it’s hard to imagine they will be able to convince a lot of people to donate to the party after this loss.

Next up is MS-01, which the Republicans have spend twice as much money defending a seat that is 10% more Republicans than the country is on average. Since Travis Childers actually beat Greg Davis in the preliminary election, there’s a good chance the Democrats will win this one as well. A win by the Democrats here could result in suicides by hardcore Republicans.

]]> By: Oliver Willis http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93426 Oliver Willis Sun, 04 May 2008 06:25:25 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93426 Yeah, I don't have any illusions that this guy will be marching with the progressive Dems any time soon - but a conservative Democrat is better than any kind of Republican. And they tried the old playbook on him and it didn't work. Again. Yeah, I don’t have any illusions that this guy will be marching with the progressive Dems any time soon - but a conservative Democrat is better than any kind of Republican. And they tried the old playbook on him and it didn’t work.

Again.

]]> By: daniel rotter http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93425 daniel rotter Sun, 04 May 2008 06:08:28 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93425 Cazayoux will probably vote with conservative Republicans on everything, though. Proably only a DINO (Democrat in Name Only) Zell-Miller-type could win in that district. Cazayoux will probably vote with conservative Republicans on everything, though. Proably only a DINO (Democrat in Name Only) Zell-Miller-type could win in that district.

]]> By: Rheinhard http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93424 Rheinhard Sun, 04 May 2008 05:50:05 +0000 http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/03/yes-cazayoux-can/#comment-93424 W00t! W00t!

]]>