MS-01 does. And every congresscritter you can get helps in the long run.

Not too bad, actually.

Thanks for asking.

Why do we even bother voting in those states? Good idea to save money and manpower… let’s just deny the vote to everyone outside of the three big swing states! Yeah, that’s the ticket. Divvy up those electoral votes according to how they ALWAYS go, and then have Ohio, Penn, and Florida decide the election.

Wellstone, your comments are getting worse and worse. I thought you were a reasonable individual at one point, but no longer. Stop being such a dick.

And Mississippi? You think MS has a chance in Hell of going Dem in November? Add it to the other list of meaningless GOP states in Obama’s bag.

Thanks you for the compliments, everyone.

How’s your Obama lookin today?

Edwards: Why the big secret? People are smart. They can handle it.
Kay: A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it.

I readily admit that no party has a monopoly on stupid. And thankfully, I now have a case subject from the Democratic side. Hey Jay, if you’re reading this… check out Wellstone’s inane, nonsensical blather!

Seriously Wellstone… Get real. For every argument you can piece together for why Clinton should get the nomination, there are two better reasons for Obama to get it. Stop being a moron.

Also:
– who’s leading in pledged delegates doesn’t count, nor who’s leading in total delegates (pledged plus super). Only the subset in which Hillary is leading (count only the superdelegates) is significant.

I am truly literally stunned, Wellstone, at how much idiocy you were able to pack into a single sentence. (Irony, too, since you followed it up with a dig at “‘Bamabots” (not that I expect you to recognize it)).

Hillary’s winning streak now stands at one. Before Pennsylvania she was blown out in Mississippi and Wyoming. But don’t let the facts get in your way.

So clearly:
– only the last 3 contests count. Anything before that, including Obama’s run of (was it 11 or 12? whatever, it was) over 3 times Hillary’s run? Not at all relevant.
– any contest where there is a level playing field but Hillary doesn’t win (i.e., caucuses) don’t count at all.
– any contest where there is not a level playing field but Hillary does win (i.e., Michigan, Florida) should definitely be counted.

Y’know, Wellstone, I really have no problem at all with irrational supporters of Obama being tagged as such. But you’re demonstrating exactly the irrational arguments that are turning people off to joining Hillary’s side. Do you want to be called the pot, or the kettle?

To Hillary, winner of the last 3 primaries, leader in Superdelegates, leader in primaries that were actually primaries and not caucuses, leader in the popular vote when you count all the places where Democrats went out and voted, like Florida.

Her momentum will carry her to a strong, 8-10 point victory in Indiana, a virtual tie in NC, and you will feel the tension rising among the ‘Bamabots as they start to scream with frustration.

They know Barack cannot get to the magic 2025 just with the motley crew of pledged delegates from wacky, Wild-West caucuses in places like Idaho and Nebraska, they can tell he’ll be damged more and more by the Wright racial divide, and the Supers, who are charged with selecting the candidate best suited to win against John McCain and the one with the biggest coat-tails in swing and at-risk States where Dems MUST win, will opt, like most late deciders to vote Hillary. .

Go, Hillary, Go! On to Puerto Rico and June 3!

Can you spell M-A-D-A-M-E P-R-E-S-I-D-E-N-T?? There’s not a single “B” or “O” in that phrase.