Wicked Looking New Dark Knight Poster
Tweet
I really hope this movie doesn’t stink, because the potential for awesomeness is huge.

5 Responses to “Wicked Looking New Dark Knight Poster”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

First thing I thought of was 9/11. Anybody else?
As for the film, following the standard rule, the 2nd will be better than the 1st. The third one will suck.
Holy shit yes.
A lot of people have mentioned it and I do see it now, but the 9/11 connection isn’t what I first saw. My first impression was, they didn’t have a better picture of Batman? Can’t explain exactly why, since we’re looking for vauge, even subliminal, impressions here. But I didn’t think that shot makes Bats look particularly… dark? Intimidating? Mysterious? Looks more like just any other guy in a rubber suit with fake muscles and a ball for a head.
At least now he can turn his ball-like head.
Yeah. Keaton never looked over his shoulder because it would have sliced off his nose.